Government Operations
167 bills 350 analyzed clauses
Explore affected groups
R FL · Senate
Vote dates filter recorded votes and vote-linked bills; sponsorship remains included.
Policy Effects
Estimated effects on people, organizations, and industries in bills this legislator sponsored, cosponsored, or voted on. Includes bills they voted against.
These are assessments of legislative text, not measurements of realized outcomes or the legislator’s intent.
This selection could not be loaded. Your current view is still available.
Open the requested selection in a full pageStart with a policy area to see the specific groups affected.
167 bills 350 analyzed clauses
Explore affected groups153 bills 319 analyzed clauses
Explore affected groups152 bills 322 analyzed clauses
Explore affected groups145 bills 405 analyzed clauses
Explore affected groups139 bills 305 analyzed clauses
Explore affected groups94 bills 211 analyzed clauses
Explore affected groups94 bills 190 analyzed clauses
Explore affected groups93 bills 268 analyzed clauses
Explore affected groups77 bills 147 analyzed clauses
Explore affected groups60 bills 102 analyzed clauses
Explore affected groups59 bills 168 analyzed clauses
Explore affected groups37 bills 58 analyzed clauses
Explore affected groups31 bills 67 analyzed clauses
Explore affected groups30 bills 82 analyzed clauses
Explore affected groups30 bills 52 analyzed clauses
Explore affected groups25 bills 61 analyzed clauses
Explore affected groups24 bills 58 analyzed clauses
Explore affected groups19 bills 43 analyzed clauses
Explore affected groups18 bills 63 analyzed clauses
Explore affected groups16 bills 33 analyzed clauses
Explore affected groups15 bills 45 analyzed clauses
Explore affected groups11 bills 26 analyzed clauses
Explore affected groups11 bills 21 analyzed clauses
Explore affected groups10 bills 61 analyzed clauses
Explore affected groups9 bills 32 analyzed clauses
Explore affected groups8 bills 24 analyzed clauses
Explore affected groups8 bills 13 analyzed clauses
Explore affected groups7 bills 20 analyzed clauses
Explore affected groups6 bills 69 analyzed clauses
Explore affected groups6 bills 25 analyzed clauses
Explore affected groups6 bills 10 analyzed clauses
Explore affected groups4 bills 11 analyzed clauses
Explore affected groups4 bills 5 analyzed clauses
Explore affected groups3 bills 5 analyzed clauses
Explore affected groups3 bills 3 analyzed clauses
Explore affected groups3 bills 3 analyzed clauses
Explore affected groups2 bills 7 analyzed clauses
Explore affected groups2 bills 3 analyzed clauses
Explore affected groups2 bills 2 analyzed clauses
Explore affected groups1 bill 18 analyzed clauses
Explore affected groups1 bill 9 analyzed clauses
Explore affected groups1 bill 7 analyzed clauses
Explore affected groups1 bill 6 analyzed clauses
Explore affected groups1 bill 6 analyzed clauses
Explore affected groups1 bill 2 analyzed clauses
Explore affected groups1 bill 2 analyzed clauses
Explore affected groups1 bill 2 analyzed clauses
Explore affected groups1 bill 2 analyzed clauses
Explore affected groups1 bill 1 analyzed clause
Explore affected groups1 bill 1 analyzed clause
Explore affected groups1 bill 1 analyzed clause
Explore affected groups1 bill 1 analyzed clause
Explore affected groups1 bill 1 analyzed clause
Explore affected groupsPotential benefits are effects assessed as favorable to the named group. Potential burdens impose costs, restrictions, risks, or lost opportunities on that group.
Mixed effects contain countervailing effects on the same group. Unclear effects have an undetermined direction. A group can have separate benefits and burdens; these are counted separately.
Counts describe the number of identified effects, not their size or public value. Bill and clause counts are distinct within each view. Shared evidence may appear under several groups or policy areas, so their counts should not be added together.
Historical bill versions are included. Clauses analyzed in different versions count separately. A bill’s current status does not establish that every analyzed provision was enacted.
Only direct effects with high or medium confidence in the policy-area assignment are included. Bills are connected through sponsorship, cosponsorship, or Yea/Nay votes; a vote against a bill does not reverse its assessed effects. Vote dates filter recorded votes and vote-linked bills; sponsorship remains included.
Loading votes...
To require a strategy for countering the People's Republic of China.
To amend title 54, United States Code, to authorize the Secretary of the Interior to make financial assistance to States under the Land and Water Conservation Fund available for water quality projects, and for other purposes.
To establish and implement a multi-year Legal Gold and Mining Partnership Strategy to reduce the negative environmental and social impacts of illicit gold mining in the Western Hemisphere, and for other purposes.
Expressing concern that illegal, unregulated, and unreported fishing threatens security, prosperity, and biodiversity in Latin America and the Caribbean and facilitates human trafficking, including forced labor, and other inhumane and criminal practices in the region.
To impose sanctions with respect to foreign persons that engage in certain transactions relating to Cuba and to impose sanctions with respect to human rights abuse and corruption in Cuba, and for other purposes.
To amend the Camp Lejeune Justice Act of 2022 to appropriately limit attorney's fees.
To terminate certain waivers of sanctions with respect to Iran issued in connection with the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action, and for other purposes.
To amend the Federal Water Pollution Control Act to modify certain allotments under that Act, and for other purposes.
To amend the Disaster Relief Supplemental Appropriations Act, 2023 to improve disaster relief funding, and for other purposes.
To amend the Federal Water Pollution Control Act to authorize the South Florida Program, and for other purposes.
To amend the Federal Water Pollution Control Act to require the Administrator of the Environmental Protection Agency to give priority consideration to selecting Pensacola and Perdido Bays as an estuary of national significance, and for other purposes.
Loading countries...
Select a clause to see detailed analysis
Failed to load analysis
Please try again
Failed to load clauses
Please try again
Explore affected groups in Policy Effects to view supporting evidence. Existing clause links also open here.
Select a clause to see detailed analysis