Healthcare
79 bills 259 analyzed clauses
Explore affected groups
R SC-3 · House
Policy Effects
Estimated effects on people, organizations, and industries in bills this legislator sponsored, cosponsored, or voted on. Includes bills they voted against.
These are assessments of legislative text, not measurements of realized outcomes or the legislator’s intent.
This selection could not be loaded. Your current view is still available.
Open the requested selection in a full pageStart with a policy area to see the specific groups affected.
79 bills 259 analyzed clauses
Explore affected groups73 bills 199 analyzed clauses
Explore affected groups62 bills 368 analyzed clauses
Explore affected groups50 bills 144 analyzed clauses
Explore affected groups37 bills 107 analyzed clauses
Explore affected groups35 bills 225 analyzed clauses
Explore affected groups34 bills 159 analyzed clauses
Explore affected groups31 bills 145 analyzed clauses
Explore affected groups25 bills 79 analyzed clauses
Explore affected groups25 bills 42 analyzed clauses
Explore affected groups23 bills 63 analyzed clauses
Explore affected groups21 bills 65 analyzed clauses
Explore affected groups21 bills 35 analyzed clauses
Explore affected groups18 bills 30 analyzed clauses
Explore affected groups16 bills 25 analyzed clauses
Explore affected groups16 bills 25 analyzed clauses
Explore affected groups13 bills 32 analyzed clauses
Explore affected groups10 bills 50 analyzed clauses
Explore affected groups9 bills 28 analyzed clauses
Explore affected groups8 bills 33 analyzed clauses
Explore affected groups7 bills 10 analyzed clauses
Explore affected groups5 bills 23 analyzed clauses
Explore affected groups5 bills 7 analyzed clauses
Explore affected groups5 bills 6 analyzed clauses
Explore affected groups4 bills 35 analyzed clauses
Explore affected groups4 bills 7 analyzed clauses
Explore affected groups3 bills 4 analyzed clauses
Explore affected groups2 bills 6 analyzed clauses
Explore affected groups2 bills 5 analyzed clauses
Explore affected groups2 bills 4 analyzed clauses
Explore affected groups2 bills 3 analyzed clauses
Explore affected groups2 bills 3 analyzed clauses
Explore affected groups2 bills 2 analyzed clauses
Explore affected groups1 bill 50 analyzed clauses
Explore affected groups1 bill 9 analyzed clauses
Explore affected groups1 bill 6 analyzed clauses
Explore affected groups1 bill 5 analyzed clauses
Explore affected groups1 bill 4 analyzed clauses
Explore affected groups1 bill 2 analyzed clauses
Explore affected groups1 bill 2 analyzed clauses
Explore affected groups1 bill 2 analyzed clauses
Explore affected groups1 bill 1 analyzed clause
Explore affected groups1 bill 1 analyzed clause
Explore affected groups1 bill 1 analyzed clause
Explore affected groups1 bill 1 analyzed clause
Explore affected groupsPotential benefits are effects assessed as favorable to the named group. Potential burdens impose costs, restrictions, risks, or lost opportunities on that group.
Mixed effects contain countervailing effects on the same group. Unclear effects have an undetermined direction. A group can have separate benefits and burdens; these are counted separately.
Counts describe the number of identified effects, not their size or public value. Bill and clause counts are distinct within each view. Shared evidence may appear under several groups or policy areas, so their counts should not be added together.
Historical bill versions are included. Clauses analyzed in different versions count separately. A bill’s current status does not establish that every analyzed provision was enacted.
Only direct effects with high or medium confidence in the policy-area assignment are included. Bills are connected through sponsorship, cosponsorship, or Yea/Nay votes; a vote against a bill does not reverse its assessed effects. Vote dates filter recorded votes and vote-linked bills; sponsorship remains included.
To require the Assistant Secretary of Commerce for Communications and Information to establish an interagency strike force to ensure that certain Federal land management agencies, including the organizational units of such agencies, prioritize the review of requests for communications use authorizations, and for other purposes.
To prohibit Federal agencies from considering, in taking any action, the social cost of carbon, the social cost of methane, the social cost of nitrous oxide, or the social cost of any other greenhouse gas, unless compliant with Office of Management and Budget guidance, and for other purposes.
To amend the Endangered Species Act of 1973 to optimize conservation through resource prioritization, incentivize wildlife conservation on private lands, provide for greater incentives to recover listed species, create greater transparency and accountability in recovering listed species, and limit reasonable and prudent measures.
Condemning the Biden administration’s politically motivated ban on liquefied natural gas exports to non-free trade agreement countries.
To abolish the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System and the Federal reserve banks, to repeal the Federal Reserve Act, and for other purposes.
Condemning the Iranian regime’s terrorism, regional proxy war, internal suppression, and for other purposes.
To prohibit a moratorium on the use of hydraulic fracturing.
To amend title 49, United States Code, to improve the safety of pipeline transportation, and for other purposes.
To counter the malign influence and theft perpetuated by the People’s Republic of China and the Chinese Communist Party.
To advance the benefits of nuclear energy by enabling efficient, timely, and predictable licensing, regulation, and deployment of nuclear energy technologies, and for other purposes.
To require coordination among Federal agencies on regulatory actions that affect the reliable operation of the bulk-power system.
To direct the Secretary of the Interior and the Secretary of Agriculture to notify applicants of the completion status of right-of-way applications under section 501 of the Federal Land Policy and Management Act of 1976 and section 28 of the Mineral Leasing Act.
Expressing support for the designation of the first Wednesday in October as National Energy Appreciation Day to celebrate the people who work to power the United States and the economy and to build awareness of the important role that America’s energy producers play in reducing poverty, strengthening national security, and improving the quality of life for people around the world.
To prohibit the Secretary of Energy from finalizing, implementing, or enforcing the proposed rule titled Energy Conservation Program: Energy Conservation Standards for Consumer Conventional Cooking Products, and for other purposes.
To amend the Toxic Substances Control Act with respect to new critical energy resources, and for other purposes.
To provide for Federal and State agency coordination in the approval of certain authorizations under the Natural Gas Act, and for other purposes.
To repeal restrictions on the export and import of natural gas.
To authorize the Administrator of the Environmental Protection Agency to waive application of certain requirements with respect to processing and refining a critical energy resource at a critical energy resource facility, and for other purposes.
To establish a more uniform, transparent, and modern process to authorize the construction, connection, operation, and maintenance of international border-crossing facilities for the import and export of oil and natural gas and the transmission of electricity.
To require the Secretary of Energy to direct the National Petroleum Council to issue a report with respect to petrochemical refineries in the United States, and for other purposes.
Loading countries...
Select a clause to see detailed analysis
Failed to load analysis
Please try again
Failed to load clauses
Please try again
Explore affected groups in Policy Effects to view supporting evidence. Existing clause links also open here.
Select a clause to see detailed analysis