HR1115-118

Reported

To provide for Federal and State agency coordination in the approval of certain authorizations under the Natural Gas Act, and for other purposes.

118th Congress Introduced Feb 21, 2023

Analysis under review: This bill has generated analysis that may be too generic or incomplete. Clause-level evidence remains available below.

Summary

What This Bill Does

The bill makes FERC the sole lead agency for NEPA review of certain natural gas pipeline and LNG authorizations. It requires early coordination with participating agencies, deference to FERC's review scope, schedules for federal authorizations, and consultation with TSA on pipeline security guidance.

Who Benefits and How

Pipeline developers and natural gas infrastructure investors benefit from a more predictable federal review process and fewer duplicative reviews. FERC gains clearer lead-agency authority.

Who Bears the Burden and How

FERC and other agencies must coordinate within the bill's process. Environmental groups and communities opposing pipeline projects may face a faster review path with less procedural leverage.

Key Provisions

  • Makes FERC the only lead agency for project NEPA review
  • Requires participating agencies to coordinate and defer to FERC's scope where allowed
  • Adds TSA consultation on pipeline infrastructure and cybersecurity practices

Evidence Chain:

This summary is generated from the full bill text using AI analysis. Expand "Detailed Analysis" below for identified beneficiaries/burden bearers with clause-level evidence links.

At a Glance

What This Bill Does

Designates FERC as the lead federal agency for coordinated natural gas pipeline authorization reviews and adds a pipeline-security consultation requirement.

Key Policy Areas

Energy, Infrastructure, Environmental Review

Primary Purpose

Designates FERC as the lead federal agency for coordinated natural gas pipeline authorization reviews and adds a pipeline-security consultation requirement.

Policy Domains

Energy Infrastructure Environmental Review

Whole bill

Identified Gains
  • Natural gas pipeline developers
  • Natural gas shippers
  • Federal permitting applicants
Model: codex-gpt-5 | Version: bill_summary_v2 | Source: rh
Natural gas shippers: , ,
Federal permitting applicants: , ,
Natural gas pipeline developers: , ,
Identified Costs
  • FERC and participating agencies
  • Environmental and community challengers to pipeline approvals
Model: codex-gpt-5 | Version: bill_summary_v2 | Source: rh
FERC and participating agencies: , ,
Environmental and community challengers to pipeline approvals: , ,

Legislative Progress

Reported
Introduced Committee Passed
Mar 23, 2023

Additional sponsors: Mrs. Miller-Meeks, Mr. Duncan, Mr. Curtis, and Mr. …

Mar 23, 2023

Reported with an amendment, committed to the Committee of the …

Feb 21, 2023

Mr. Burgess introduced the following bill; which was referred to …

Stakeholder Effects

cui bono?

How this legislation distributes effects. Mention counts reflect frequency, not effect magnitude.

Oil & Gas
7 mentions across 5 clauses
+4 positive -3 negative

Natural gas pipeline and LNG project developers, Natural gas pipeline applicants subject to security review, Natural gas pipeline infrastructure and customers

Natural gas pipeline and LNG project developers, Natural gas pipeline applicants subject to security review, Natural gas pipeline infrastructure and customers face effects in multiple directions

Government
5 mentions across 5 clauses
+2 positive -3 negative

FERC and TSA pipeline security reviewers, Federal Energy Regulatory Commission permitting staff

FERC and TSA pipeline security reviewers, Federal Energy Regulatory Commission permitting staff face effects in multiple directions

State & Local Government
3 mentions across 3 clauses
+1 positive -2 negative

State and federal participating permitting agencies

State and federal participating permitting agencies faces effects in multiple directions

Environment
3 mentions across 3 clauses
+1 positive -2 negative

Environmental groups challenging pipeline approvals

Environmental groups challenging pipeline approvals faces effects in multiple directions

Security Services
2 mentions across 2 clauses
+1 positive -1 negative

Pipeline security service providers

Pipeline security service providers faces effects in multiple directions

3/3
sections analyzed
Full impact breakdown

Bill Structure & Actor Mappings

Who is "The Secretary" in each section?

Domains
Energy Infrastructure Environmental Review
Actor Mappings
"commission"
→ Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
"administrator"
→ Transportation Security Administration Administrator

Key Definitions

Terms defined in this bill

1 term
"project-related NEPA review" §2

NEPA review required for Natural Gas Act section 3 authorizations or section 7 certificates.

We use a combination of our own taxonomy and classification in addition to large language models to assess meaning and potential beneficiaries. High confidence means strong textual evidence. Always verify with the original bill text.

Learn more about our methodology