Government Operations
75 bills 536 analyzed clauses
Explore affected groups
R OR-5 · House
Policy Effects
Estimated effects on people, organizations, and industries in bills this legislator sponsored, cosponsored, or voted on. Includes bills they voted against.
These are assessments of legislative text, not measurements of realized outcomes or the legislator’s intent.
This selection could not be loaded. Your current view is still available.
Open the requested selection in a full pageStart with a policy area to see the specific groups affected.
75 bills 536 analyzed clauses
Explore affected groups63 bills 251 analyzed clauses
Explore affected groups43 bills 226 analyzed clauses
Explore affected groups31 bills 287 analyzed clauses
Explore affected groups31 bills 160 analyzed clauses
Explore affected groups27 bills 86 analyzed clauses
Explore affected groups21 bills 55 analyzed clauses
Explore affected groups16 bills 87 analyzed clauses
Explore affected groups15 bills 49 analyzed clauses
Explore affected groups11 bills 26 analyzed clauses
Explore affected groups10 bills 13 analyzed clauses
Explore affected groups9 bills 49 analyzed clauses
Explore affected groups7 bills 12 analyzed clauses
Explore affected groups5 bills 20 analyzed clauses
Explore affected groups5 bills 17 analyzed clauses
Explore affected groups5 bills 12 analyzed clauses
Explore affected groups4 bills 21 analyzed clauses
Explore affected groups4 bills 8 analyzed clauses
Explore affected groups3 bills 8 analyzed clauses
Explore affected groups3 bills 6 analyzed clauses
Explore affected groups3 bills 4 analyzed clauses
Explore affected groups2 bills 16 analyzed clauses
Explore affected groups2 bills 12 analyzed clauses
Explore affected groups1 bill 22 analyzed clauses
Explore affected groups1 bill 11 analyzed clauses
Explore affected groups1 bill 6 analyzed clauses
Explore affected groups1 bill 4 analyzed clauses
Explore affected groups1 bill 2 analyzed clauses
Explore affected groups1 bill 2 analyzed clauses
Explore affected groups1 bill 2 analyzed clauses
Explore affected groups1 bill 1 analyzed clause
Explore affected groups1 bill 1 analyzed clause
Explore affected groupsPotential benefits are effects assessed as favorable to the named group. Potential burdens impose costs, restrictions, risks, or lost opportunities on that group.
Mixed effects contain countervailing effects on the same group. Unclear effects have an undetermined direction. A group can have separate benefits and burdens; these are counted separately.
Counts describe the number of identified effects, not their size or public value. Bill and clause counts are distinct within each view. Shared evidence may appear under several groups or policy areas, so their counts should not be added together.
Historical bill versions are included. Clauses analyzed in different versions count separately. A bill’s current status does not establish that every analyzed provision was enacted.
Only direct effects with high or medium confidence in the policy-area assignment are included. Bills are connected through sponsorship, cosponsorship, or Yea/Nay votes; a vote against a bill does not reverse its assessed effects. Vote dates filter recorded votes and vote-linked bills; sponsorship remains included.
To expedite under the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 and improve forest management activities on National Forest System lands, on public lands under the jurisdiction of the Bureau of Land Management, and on Tribal lands to return resilience to overgrown, fire-prone forested lands, and for other purposes.
To address the public safety issues and environmental destruction currently impacting Federal lands along the southern border, enhance border security through the construction of navigable roads on Federal lands along the southern border, provide U.S. Customs and Border Protection access to Federal lands to improve the safety and effectiveness of enforcement activities, allow States to place temporary barriers on Federal land to secure the southern border, reduce the massive trash accumulations and environmental degradation along the southern border, reduce the cultivation of illegal cannabis on Federal lands, mitigate wildland fires caused by illegal immigration, and prohibit migrant housing on Federal lands.
To require each agency to evaluate the permitting system of the agency, to consider whether a permit by rule could replace that system, and for other purposes.
To amend the Higher Education Act of 1965 to require institutions of higher education to adopt and adhere to principles of free speech, and for other purposes.
To provide for certain reviews of the use and safety of Federal buildings, and for other purposes.
To amend the Animal Welfare Act to prohibit commercial greyhound racing, live lure training, and open field coursing, and for other purposes.
To reform the immigration laws.
To amend the Higher Education Act of 1965 to increase the Federal student loan limits for students in flight education and training programs.
To create protections for financial institutions that provide financial services to State-sanctioned marijuana businesses and service providers for such businesses, and for other purposes.
To ensure the rights of parents are honored and protected in the Nation’s public schools.
Loading countries...
Select a clause to see detailed analysis
Failed to load analysis
Please try again
Failed to load clauses
Please try again
Explore affected groups in Policy Effects to view supporting evidence. Existing clause links also open here.
Select a clause to see detailed analysis