Healthcare
62 bills 228 analyzed clauses
Explore affected groups
D DE · Senate
Policy Effects
Estimated effects on people, organizations, and industries in bills this legislator sponsored, cosponsored, or voted on. Includes bills they voted against.
These are assessments of legislative text, not measurements of realized outcomes or the legislator’s intent.
This selection could not be loaded. Your current view is still available.
Open the requested selection in a full pageStart with a policy area to see the specific groups affected.
62 bills 228 analyzed clauses
Explore affected groups49 bills 791 analyzed clauses
Explore affected groups45 bills 807 analyzed clauses
Explore affected groups32 bills 158 analyzed clauses
Explore affected groups30 bills 119 analyzed clauses
Explore affected groups21 bills 117 analyzed clauses
Explore affected groups21 bills 45 analyzed clauses
Explore affected groups20 bills 63 analyzed clauses
Explore affected groups19 bills 97 analyzed clauses
Explore affected groups17 bills 98 analyzed clauses
Explore affected groups13 bills 183 analyzed clauses
Explore affected groups12 bills 22 analyzed clauses
Explore affected groups11 bills 37 analyzed clauses
Explore affected groups10 bills 73 analyzed clauses
Explore affected groups9 bills 36 analyzed clauses
Explore affected groups9 bills 35 analyzed clauses
Explore affected groups8 bills 53 analyzed clauses
Explore affected groups8 bills 15 analyzed clauses
Explore affected groups8 bills 12 analyzed clauses
Explore affected groups7 bills 19 analyzed clauses
Explore affected groups7 bills 17 analyzed clauses
Explore affected groups4 bills 4 analyzed clauses
Explore affected groups3 bills 41 analyzed clauses
Explore affected groups3 bills 5 analyzed clauses
Explore affected groups2 bills 95 analyzed clauses
Explore affected groups2 bills 24 analyzed clauses
Explore affected groups2 bills 4 analyzed clauses
Explore affected groups2 bills 2 analyzed clauses
Explore affected groups1 bill 54 analyzed clauses
Explore affected groups1 bill 26 analyzed clauses
Explore affected groups1 bill 19 analyzed clauses
Explore affected groups1 bill 16 analyzed clauses
Explore affected groups1 bill 15 analyzed clauses
Explore affected groups1 bill 13 analyzed clauses
Explore affected groups1 bill 10 analyzed clauses
Explore affected groups1 bill 9 analyzed clauses
Explore affected groups1 bill 7 analyzed clauses
Explore affected groups1 bill 4 analyzed clauses
Explore affected groups1 bill 4 analyzed clauses
Explore affected groups1 bill 3 analyzed clauses
Explore affected groups1 bill 2 analyzed clauses
Explore affected groups1 bill 2 analyzed clauses
Explore affected groups1 bill 1 analyzed clause
Explore affected groups1 bill 1 analyzed clause
Explore affected groups1 bill 1 analyzed clause
Explore affected groups1 bill 1 analyzed clause
Explore affected groups1 bill 1 analyzed clause
Explore affected groupsPotential benefits are effects assessed as favorable to the named group. Potential burdens impose costs, restrictions, risks, or lost opportunities on that group.
Mixed effects contain countervailing effects on the same group. Unclear effects have an undetermined direction. A group can have separate benefits and burdens; these are counted separately.
Counts describe the number of identified effects, not their size or public value. Bill and clause counts are distinct within each view. Shared evidence may appear under several groups or policy areas, so their counts should not be added together.
Historical bill versions are included. Clauses analyzed in different versions count separately. A bill’s current status does not establish that every analyzed provision was enacted.
Only direct effects with high or medium confidence in the policy-area assignment are included. Bills are connected through sponsorship, cosponsorship, or Yea/Nay votes; a vote against a bill does not reverse its assessed effects. Vote dates filter recorded votes and vote-linked bills; sponsorship remains included.
To amend titles XIX and XXI of the Social Security Act to enhance financial support for rural and safety net hospitals providing maternity, labor, and delivery services to vulnerable populations, and for other purposes.
To provide for improvements to the rivers and harbors of the United States, to provide for the conservation and development of water and related resources, and for other purposes.
To enhance the security operations of the Transportation Security Administration and stability of the transportation security workforce by applying the personnel system under title 5, United States Code, to employees of the Transportation Security Administration, and for other purposes.
To amend the Voting Rights Act of 1965 to revise the criteria for determining which States and political subdivisions are subject to section 4 of the Act, and for other purposes.
To reauthorize the America's Conservation Enhancement Act, and for other purposes.
To amend title 31, United States Code, to improve the management of improper payments, and for other purposes.
To amend title II of the Social Security Act to improve coordination between the Do Not Pay working system and Federal and State agencies authorized to use the system.
To expand Americans’ access to the ballot box and reduce the influence of big money in politics, and for other purposes.
To require the Secretary of Commerce to establish the Sea Turtle Rescue Assistance Grant Program.
To prohibit discrimination on the basis of sex, gender identity, and sexual orientation, and for other purposes.
To protect the safety of children on the internet.
To establish a pilot grant program to improve recycling accessibility, and for other purposes.
To amend the National Labor Relations Act, the Labor Management Relations Act, 1947, and the Labor-Management Reporting and Disclosure Act of 1959, and for other purposes.
To amend the Federal Fire Prevention and Control Act of 1974 to authorize appropriations for the United States Fire Administration and firefighter assistance grant programs.
To amend title 28, United States Code, to provide for a code of conduct for justices of the Supreme Court of the United States, and for other purposes.
To implement merit-based reforms to the civil service hiring system that replace degree-based hiring with skills- and competency-based hiring.
Loading countries...
Select a clause to see detailed analysis
Failed to load analysis
Please try again
Failed to load clauses
Please try again
Explore affected groups in Policy Effects to view supporting evidence. Existing clause links also open here.
Select a clause to see detailed analysis