Healthcare
51 bills 217 analyzed clauses
Explore affected groups
R OH-2 · House
Policy Effects
Estimated effects on people, organizations, and industries in bills this legislator sponsored, cosponsored, or voted on. Includes bills they voted against.
These are assessments of legislative text, not measurements of realized outcomes or the legislator’s intent.
This selection could not be loaded. Your current view is still available.
Open the requested selection in a full pageStart with a policy area to see the specific groups affected.
51 bills 217 analyzed clauses
Explore affected groups49 bills 320 analyzed clauses
Explore affected groups25 bills 124 analyzed clauses
Explore affected groups22 bills 61 analyzed clauses
Explore affected groups21 bills 413 analyzed clauses
Explore affected groups17 bills 81 analyzed clauses
Explore affected groups15 bills 201 analyzed clauses
Explore affected groups12 bills 32 analyzed clauses
Explore affected groups10 bills 24 analyzed clauses
Explore affected groups8 bills 30 analyzed clauses
Explore affected groups7 bills 16 analyzed clauses
Explore affected groups6 bills 33 analyzed clauses
Explore affected groups6 bills 19 analyzed clauses
Explore affected groups5 bills 29 analyzed clauses
Explore affected groups5 bills 8 analyzed clauses
Explore affected groups4 bills 7 analyzed clauses
Explore affected groups3 bills 37 analyzed clauses
Explore affected groups3 bills 16 analyzed clauses
Explore affected groups3 bills 10 analyzed clauses
Explore affected groups3 bills 3 analyzed clauses
Explore affected groups2 bills 9 analyzed clauses
Explore affected groups2 bills 8 analyzed clauses
Explore affected groups2 bills 3 analyzed clauses
Explore affected groups2 bills 3 analyzed clauses
Explore affected groups1 bill 11 analyzed clauses
Explore affected groups1 bill 7 analyzed clauses
Explore affected groups1 bill 6 analyzed clauses
Explore affected groups1 bill 4 analyzed clauses
Explore affected groups1 bill 2 analyzed clauses
Explore affected groups1 bill 2 analyzed clauses
Explore affected groups1 bill 2 analyzed clauses
Explore affected groups1 bill 1 analyzed clause
Explore affected groups1 bill 1 analyzed clause
Explore affected groups1 bill 1 analyzed clause
Explore affected groups1 bill 1 analyzed clause
Explore affected groups1 bill 1 analyzed clause
Explore affected groupsPotential benefits are effects assessed as favorable to the named group. Potential burdens impose costs, restrictions, risks, or lost opportunities on that group.
Mixed effects contain countervailing effects on the same group. Unclear effects have an undetermined direction. A group can have separate benefits and burdens; these are counted separately.
Counts describe the number of identified effects, not their size or public value. Bill and clause counts are distinct within each view. Shared evidence may appear under several groups or policy areas, so their counts should not be added together.
Historical bill versions are included. Clauses analyzed in different versions count separately. A bill’s current status does not establish that every analyzed provision was enacted.
Only direct effects with high or medium confidence in the policy-area assignment are included. Bills are connected through sponsorship, cosponsorship, or Yea/Nay votes; a vote against a bill does not reverse its assessed effects. Vote dates filter recorded votes and vote-linked bills; sponsorship remains included.
To eliminate the incentive to distribute e-commerce shipments from foreign countries by providing parity to United States foreign-trade zones, and for other purposes.
To amend the Higher Education Act of 1965 to prohibit graduate medical schools from receiving Federal financial assistance if such schools adopt certain policies and requirements relating to diversity, equity, and inclusion.
To promote election integrity, voter confidence, and faith in elections by removing Federal impediments to, equipping States with tools for, and establishing voluntary considerations to support effective State administration of Federal elections, improving election administration in the District of Columbia, improving the effectiveness of military voting programs, enhancing election security, and protecting political speech, and for other purposes.
To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to reform the low-income housing credit, and for other purposes.
To ensure the rights of parents are honored and protected in the Nation’s public schools.
To provide for a moratorium on Federal funding to Planned Parenthood Federation of America, Inc.
Loading countries...
Select a clause to see detailed analysis
Failed to load analysis
Please try again
Failed to load clauses
Please try again
Explore affected groups in Policy Effects to view supporting evidence. Existing clause links also open here.
Select a clause to see detailed analysis