Back to Legislators

Mark Takano

Analysis

D CA-39 · House

2025–Present House Of Representatives (District 39)

2023–2025 House Of Representatives (District 39)

2021–2023 House Of Representatives (District 41)

2019–2021 House Of Representatives (District 41)

2017–2019 House Of Representatives (District 41)

2015–2017 House Of Representatives (District 41)

2013–2015 House Of Representatives (District 41)

Defense

+176

Helped 1322 Hurt 1146 Unclear 856

Healthcare

+366

Helped 1108 Hurt 742 Mixed 39 Unclear 911

Education

+134

Helped 838 Hurt 704 Unclear 517

Finance

-83

Helped 738 Hurt 821 Mixed 4 Unclear 378

Labor

+165

Helped 467 Hurt 302 Unclear 325

Energy

-68

Helped 316 Hurt 384 Mixed 3 Unclear 327

Government Operations

-23

Helped 51 Hurt 74 Unclear 846

Veterans Affairs

+314

Helped 495 Hurt 181 Unclear 130

Agriculture

+155

Helped 372 Hurt 217 Unclear 125

Environment

-50

Helped 160 Hurt 210 Unclear 244

Criminal Justice

-24

Helped 233 Hurt 257 Mixed 4 Unclear 50

Transportation

-15

Helped 199 Hurt 214 Unclear 130

Immigration

-130

Helped 164 Hurt 294 Mixed 4 Unclear 73

Housing

+174

Helped 286 Hurt 112 Unclear 33

Trade

+33

Helped 198 Hurt 165 Mixed 2 Unclear 45

Social Welfare

+145

Helped 243 Hurt 98 Unclear 60

Technology

+51

Helped 184 Hurt 133 Unclear 53

Military Procurement

+17

Helped 142 Hurt 125 Unclear 101

Civil Rights

+26

Helped 136 Hurt 110 Unclear 55

Federal Budget

+162

Helped 207 Hurt 45 Unclear 36

20 policy domains

Helped Hurt Mixed Unclear

Industry Impact Profile

22869 industry impacts

All entities →

How this is computed

P Primary sponsor · C Co-sponsor · Y Yea vote · N Nay vote

Weighted score (w:) uses strongest role per bill. Weights: Primary 1.0, Co-sponsor 0.3, Yea 0.1, Nay -0.1.

Bills where the legislator voted nay (without sponsorship) contribute -0.1 per bill. Equal yea and nay roll calls on the same bill contribute 0.

Vote date filters affect vote attribution; sponsorship is always included.

Positive-Effect Industries

Government 2419 C·169 Y·2188 N·1804 w:13.1

Direct (1898), Defense (128), Veterans Affairs (116), DoD (32), Legislative Branch (20), State (19), VA (19), Executive (16), USDA (16), Legislative (14), Treasury (13), Agriculture (11), Congress (11), Coast Guard (9), NPS (7), CMS (6), Justice (6), Oversight (6), DOJ (4), Education (4), Foreign Affairs (4), ICE (4), Judiciary (4), Research (4), Local (3), Medicare (3), Transportation (3), Army Corps (2), Cemeteries (2), DHS (2), FDA (2), FEMA (2), Housing (2), Interior/USDA (2), International Development (2), Military Logistics (2), NASA (2), NOAA (2), SBA (2), SSA (2), Defense R&D (1), EPA (1), Federal Executive (1), Federal Law Enforcement (1), HHS (1), IBWC (1), Intelligence (1), Judicial (1), Manufacturing (1), Municipal (1), National Security (1), Science Agencies (1), Territorial (1)

General Public 945 P·12 C·320 Y·503 N·480 w:14.4

Direct (669), Veterans (124), Underserved Communities (76), Families (26), Seniors (19), Military Families (17), Rural (4), Consumers (3), Military (3), Foreign (2), Youth (2)

Education 757 P·47 C·491 Y·207 N·174 w:19.8

Direct (746), Child Care (3), Maritime Training (2), Developing Countries (1), Immigrant Students (1), Religious Studies (1), Research Universities (1), Technical (1), Tribal (1)

Healthcare 590 C·283 Y·307 N·205 w:6.4

Direct (568), Research (15), Community (3), Tribal (3), Patients (1)

Military 427 P·1 C·21 Y·405 N·363 w:3.5

Direct (424), Air Force (2), Families (1)

Defense 377 Y·377 N·343 w:0.0

Direct (364), Naval (2), Testing (2), Ammunition (1), Ground Vehicles (1), Missiles (1), Missiles/Hypersonics (1), Nuclear C3 (1), Rotorcraft (1), Small Business (1), Small/Innovative (1), Space Systems (1)

Labor 374 C·329 Y·41 N·28 w:8.4

Direct (373), Maritime (1)

Financial Services 259 P·12 C·45 Y·107 N·188 w:7.5

Direct (252), HSA (7)

State & Local Government 245 P·3 C·103 Y·136 N·81 w:6.9

Direct (239), Medicaid (6)

Veterans 233 P·20 C·76 Y·137 N·85 w:11.4

Negative-Effect Industries

Government 3695 P·65 C·1563 Y·1653 N·1507 w:85.7

Direct (3282), Defense (101), Veterans Affairs (70), Regulatory (43), EPA (30), Coast Guard (27), NPS (11), FDA (9), Education (8), Agriculture (7), BLM (7), Forest Service (7), SEC (7), HHS (6), Foreign (5), CFPB (4), Federal (4), Federal Child Welfare (4), Treasury/IRS (4), VA (4), DOJ (3), Executive (3), Legislative (3), Legislative Branch (3), NOAA (3), NOAA/EPA (3), Natural Resources (3), Acquisition (2), Congress (2), Defense Acquisition (2), FBI (2), Foreign Diplomatic (2), Law Enforcement (2), Military (2), DOE (1), DoD (1), Energy Department (1), Energy/Defense (1), Environmental Regulation (1), Executive Branch (1), Federal Immigration (1), Federal Law Enforcement (1), Intelligence (1), Interior Department (1), NNSA (1), Property Management (1), Science Agencies (1), Space Force (1), State (1), Strategic Command (1), Treasury (1), U.S. Coast Guard (1), USDA (1), Waste Management (1)

Education 407 P·92 C·153 Y·90 N·160 w:13.9

Financial Services 249 P·11 C·123 Y·85 N·86 w:9.9

Military 249 P·1 C·4 Y·244 N·224 w:1.0

Direct (245), Intercontinental Ballistic Missile Systems (3), Space Force (1)

General Public 242 C·5 Y·189 N·205 w:0.9

Direct (214), Veterans (21), Family Sponsors (4), Environmental Health (1), Environmental Justice (1), Water Quality (1)

Healthcare 241 C·95 Y·128 N·126 w:4.6

Direct (236), Family Planning Services (2), Public Health (2), Surgical (1)

Defense 238 C·3 Y·220 N·227 w:0.6

Direct (234), Nuclear (2), Logistics (1), Maintenance (1)

Taxpayers 236 P·4 C·147 Y·85 N·85 w:16.0

State & Local Government 192 C·91 Y·84 N·88 w:5.9

Direct (189), Non-Expansion (3)

Small Business 175 P·13 C·120 Y·21 N·42 w:11.1

Click any row to see supporting clauses

Showing positive and negative-direction effects only. Mixed and uncertain effects are not included in these counts.

Votes by Industry (Yea/Nay Alignment)

How this legislator's Yea/Nay votes landed across industries; distinct from overall bill exposure above.

Analysis coverage

100.0% of votes

Show vote-alignment table

S+ Supported Benefits

S- Supported Burdens

O+ Opposed Benefits

O- Opposed Burdens

Industry	S+	S-	Net
Government (75 sub) Sub-categories (total impacts, all buckets): Defense (229), Veterans Affairs (183), Coast Guard (36), DoD (33), EPA (31) +70 more			-435
General Public (8 sub) Sub-categories (total impacts, all buckets): Veterans (141), Military Families (17), Family Sponsors (4), Military (3), Foreign (2) +3 more			-188
Military (4 sub) Sub-categories (total impacts, all buckets): Intercontinental Ballistic Missile Systems (3), Air Force (2), Families (1), Space Force (1)			-117
Defense (14 sub) Sub-categories (total impacts, all buckets): Naval (2), Nuclear (2), Testing (2), Ammunition (1), Ground Vehicles (1) +9 more			-90
Healthcare (5 sub) Sub-categories (total impacts, all buckets): Research (15), Community (3), Tribal (3), Family Planning Services (2), Public Health (2)			+3
Education (6 sub) Sub-categories (total impacts, all buckets): Child Care (3), Maritime Training (2), Immigrant Students (1), Religious Studies (1), Research Universities (1) +1 more			+29
Cryptocurrency	-	-	-71
Transportation (6 sub) Sub-categories (total impacts, all buckets): Foreign (2), Labor (2), Technology (2), Tourism (2), Moving (1) +1 more			+12
Financial Services (1 sub) Sub-categories (total impacts, all buckets): HSA (7)			-117
State & Local Government (2 sub) Sub-categories (total impacts, all buckets): Medicaid (6), Non-Expansion (3)			+52
Construction (4 sub) Sub-categories (total impacts, all buckets): Federal Projects (1), Federal/Military (1), Military/Pacific (1), Utilities/Infrastructure (1)		-	-93
Manufacturing (4 sub) Sub-categories (total impacts, all buckets): Foreign (8), Electrical Equipment (2), Defense (1), Foreign Adversary (1)			+2
Taxpayers	-	-	-15
Agriculture (6 sub) Sub-categories (total impacts, all buckets): Coffee (2), Commodities (2), Hemp (2), Livestock (2), Coffee Production (1) +1 more			-127
Law Enforcement			-26

Votes are cast on entire bills; attribution to individual clauses does not imply clause-level intent. Learn more

Loading votes...