Government Operations
24 bills 68 analyzed clauses
Explore affected groups
R NY-3 · House
Policy Effects
Estimated effects on people, organizations, and industries in bills this legislator sponsored, cosponsored, or voted on. Includes bills they voted against.
These are assessments of legislative text, not measurements of realized outcomes or the legislator’s intent.
This selection could not be loaded. Your current view is still available.
Open the requested selection in a full pageStart with a policy area to see the specific groups affected.
24 bills 68 analyzed clauses
Explore affected groups23 bills 347 analyzed clauses
Explore affected groups21 bills 62 analyzed clauses
Explore affected groups16 bills 129 analyzed clauses
Explore affected groups12 bills 24 analyzed clauses
Explore affected groups11 bills 45 analyzed clauses
Explore affected groups11 bills 23 analyzed clauses
Explore affected groups9 bills 11 analyzed clauses
Explore affected groups8 bills 11 analyzed clauses
Explore affected groups6 bills 13 analyzed clauses
Explore affected groups5 bills 21 analyzed clauses
Explore affected groups5 bills 7 analyzed clauses
Explore affected groups4 bills 10 analyzed clauses
Explore affected groups4 bills 4 analyzed clauses
Explore affected groups3 bills 38 analyzed clauses
Explore affected groups3 bills 11 analyzed clauses
Explore affected groups3 bills 5 analyzed clauses
Explore affected groups3 bills 3 analyzed clauses
Explore affected groups2 bills 38 analyzed clauses
Explore affected groups2 bills 3 analyzed clauses
Explore affected groups2 bills 2 analyzed clauses
Explore affected groups2 bills 2 analyzed clauses
Explore affected groups1 bill 11 analyzed clauses
Explore affected groups1 bill 8 analyzed clauses
Explore affected groups1 bill 6 analyzed clauses
Explore affected groups1 bill 4 analyzed clauses
Explore affected groups1 bill 3 analyzed clauses
Explore affected groups1 bill 2 analyzed clauses
Explore affected groups1 bill 1 analyzed clause
Explore affected groups1 bill 1 analyzed clause
Explore affected groups1 bill 1 analyzed clause
Explore affected groups1 bill 1 analyzed clause
Explore affected groups1 bill 1 analyzed clause
Explore affected groups1 bill 1 analyzed clause
Explore affected groups1 bill 1 analyzed clause
Explore affected groupsPotential benefits are effects assessed as favorable to the named group. Potential burdens impose costs, restrictions, risks, or lost opportunities on that group.
Mixed effects contain countervailing effects on the same group. Unclear effects have an undetermined direction. A group can have separate benefits and burdens; these are counted separately.
Counts describe the number of identified effects, not their size or public value. Bill and clause counts are distinct within each view. Shared evidence may appear under several groups or policy areas, so their counts should not be added together.
Historical bill versions are included. Clauses analyzed in different versions count separately. A bill’s current status does not establish that every analyzed provision was enacted.
Only direct effects with high or medium confidence in the policy-area assignment are included. Bills are connected through sponsorship, cosponsorship, or Yea/Nay votes; a vote against a bill does not reverse its assessed effects. Vote dates filter recorded votes and vote-linked bills; sponsorship remains included.
To prohibit persons from storing the covered data of covered platforms in the United States in a foreign adversary or permitting governmental officials of foreign adversaries to access the covered data, and for other purposes.
To require a comprehensive report that contains a strategy for United States involvement in Ukraine.
To amend the Omnibus Crime Control and Safe Streets Act of 1968 to require certain reporting on sexual assault kit testing.
To provide for the appointment of a Special Counsel to investigate and prosecute any charges arising from the activity of signatories to the letter entitled Public Statement on the Hunter Biden Emails (October 19, 2020) involving election interference.
To require that information on spending associated with national emergencies be subject to the same reporting requirements as other Federal funds under the Federal Funding Accountability and Transparency Act of 2006, and for other purposes.
To direct the Director of the Office of Management and Budget to require the disclosure of violations of Federal law with respect to human trafficking or alien smuggling, and for other purposes.
To prohibit the availability of funds to provide assistance to foreign countries that criminalize or discriminate based on gender, and for other purposes.
To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to reinstate the exception for de minimis payments by third party settlement organizations with respect to returns relating to payments made in settlement of payment card and third party network transactions, as in effect prior to the enactment of the American Rescue Plan Act.
Loading countries...
Select a clause to see detailed analysis
Failed to load analysis
Please try again
Failed to load clauses
Please try again
Explore affected groups in Policy Effects to view supporting evidence. Existing clause links also open here.
Select a clause to see detailed analysis