Back to Legislators

Kweisi Mfume

Analysis

D MD-7 · House

2025–Present House Of Representatives (District 7)

2023–2025 House Of Representatives (District 7)

2021–2023 House Of Representatives (District 7)

2020–2021 House Of Representatives (District 7)

1995–1997 House Of Representatives (District 7)

1993–1995 House Of Representatives (District 7)

1991–1993 House Of Representatives (District 7)

1989–1991 House Of Representatives (District 7)

1987–1989 House Of Representatives (District 7)

Defense

+151

Helped 1295 Hurt 1144 Unclear 789

Healthcare

+353

Helped 998 Hurt 645 Mixed 39 Unclear 578

Finance

-39

Helped 756 Hurt 795 Mixed 2 Unclear 349

Education

Helped 394 Hurt 388 Unclear 247

Energy

-60

Helped 325 Hurt 385 Mixed 3 Unclear 229

Criminal Justice

-103

Helped 299 Hurt 402 Mixed 4 Unclear 56

Agriculture

+94

Helped 326 Hurt 232 Unclear 120

Labor

+128

Helped 300 Hurt 172 Unclear 185

Transportation

-50

Helped 210 Hurt 260 Unclear 121

Veterans Affairs

+188

Helped 335 Hurt 147 Unclear 105

Environment

-76

Helped 102 Hurt 178 Unclear 208

Government Operations

-33

Helped 61 Hurt 94 Unclear 329

Trade

+17

Helped 207 Hurt 190 Mixed 1 Unclear 52

Immigration

-154

Helped 111 Hurt 265 Mixed 4 Unclear 56

Technology

+27

Helped 202 Hurt 175 Unclear 57

Elections

-7

Helped 189 Hurt 196 Mixed 2 Unclear 2

Military Procurement

+17

Helped 142 Hurt 125 Unclear 101

Housing

+116

Helped 213 Hurt 97 Unclear 36

Civil Rights

+53

Helped 158 Hurt 105 Unclear 46

Federal Budget

+162

Helped 207 Hurt 45 Unclear 36

20 policy domains

Helped Hurt Mixed Unclear

Industry Impact Profile

21128 industry impacts

All entities →

How this is computed

P Primary sponsor · C Co-sponsor · Y Yea vote · N Nay vote

Weighted score (w:) uses strongest role per bill. Weights: Primary 1.0, Co-sponsor 0.3, Yea 0.1, Nay -0.1.

Bills where the legislator voted nay (without sponsorship) contribute -0.1 per bill. Equal yea and nay roll calls on the same bill contribute 0.

Vote date filters affect vote attribution; sponsorship is always included.

Positive-Effect Industries

Government 2423 C·202 Y·2160 N·1804 w:15.1

Direct (1916), Defense (128), Veterans Affairs (114), DoD (32), State (19), VA (19), Executive (16), USDA (16), Congress (15), Legislative (14), Agriculture (11), Treasury (11), Coast Guard (9), NPS (7), CMS (6), Judiciary (6), Justice (6), Oversight (6), Legislative Branch (5), DOJ (4), Education (4), Foreign Affairs (4), ICE (4), Research (4), Local (3), Medicare (3), Transportation (3), Army Corps (2), Cemeteries (2), DHS (2), FDA (2), FEMA (2), Housing (2), Interior/USDA (2), International Development (2), Military Logistics (2), NASA (2), NOAA (2), SBA (2), SSA (2), Defense R&D (1), EPA (1), Federal Executive (1), Federal Law Enforcement (1), HHS (1), IBWC (1), Intelligence (1), Judicial (1), Manufacturing (1), Municipal (1), National Security (1), State Government (1)

General Public 758 P·2 C·158 Y·489 N·480 w:11.6

Direct (615), Veterans (121), Military Families (17), Military (3), Foreign (2)

Healthcare 585 P·2 C·284 Y·299 N·205 w:5.8

Direct (564), Research (15), Community (3), Tribal (3)

Military 431 C·26 Y·405 N·363 w:2.8

Direct (428), Air Force (2), Families (1)

Defense 384 C·7 Y·377 N·343 w:0.6

Direct (371), Naval (2), Testing (2), Ammunition (1), Ground Vehicles (1), Missiles (1), Missiles/Hypersonics (1), Nuclear C3 (1), Rotorcraft (1), Small Business (1), Small/Innovative (1), Space Systems (1)

Education 358 P·6 C·133 Y·207 N·174 w:12.7

Direct (346), Child Care (3), Maritime Training (2), Immigrant Students (1), K12 (1), K12 Administration (1), Religious Studies (1), Research Universities (1), State Administration (1), Technical (1)

Financial Services 231 P·1 C·28 Y·107 N·188 w:4.7

Direct (224), HSA (7)

State & Local Government 225 C·95 Y·127 N·81 w:5.4

Direct (219), Medicaid (6)

Labor 224 C·179 Y·41 N·28 w:7.8

Direct (223), Maritime (1)

Transportation 215 C·35 Y·177 N·82 w:1.2

Direct (213), Labor (2)

Negative-Effect Industries

Government 3291 P·11 C·1288 Y·1602 N·1485 w:67.3

Direct (2882), Defense (101), Veterans Affairs (66), Regulatory (43), EPA (30), Coast Guard (27), NPS (11), FDA (9), Education (8), Executive Branch (8), Agriculture (7), BLM (7), Forest Service (7), SEC (7), HHS (6), DOJ (5), Foreign (5), CFPB (4), Federal Child Welfare (4), Treasury/IRS (4), VA (4), Executive (3), Legislative (3), NOAA (3), NOAA/EPA (3), Acquisition (2), Congress (2), Defense Acquisition (2), FBI (2), Foreign Diplomatic (2), Law Enforcement (2), Military (2), DOE (1), DoD (1), Energy Department (1), Energy/Defense (1), Environmental Regulation (1), Federal (1), Federal Immigration (1), Federal Law Enforcement (1), Intelligence (1), Interior Department (1), NNSA (1), Presidential Transitions (1), Science Agencies (1), Space Force (1), State (1), Strategic Command (1), Treasury (1), U.S. Coast Guard (1), USDA (1), Waste Management (1)

Defense 252 P·2 C·15 Y·220 N·227 w:3.1

Direct (248), Nuclear (2), Logistics (1), Maintenance (1)

Healthcare 246 C·108 Y·120 N·126 w:3.3

Direct (242), Family Planning Services (2), Public Health (2)

Financial Services 245 P·8 C·122 Y·85 N·86 w:8.3

General Public 245 C·13 Y·185 N·204 w:1.9

Direct (218), Veterans (20), Family Sponsors (4), Environmental Health (1), Environmental Justice (1), Water Quality (1)

Military 244 Y·244 N·224 w:-0.3

Direct (240), Intercontinental Ballistic Missile Systems (3), Space Force (1)

Law Enforcement 227 C·163 Y·18 N·57 w:5.5

Education 225 P·6 C·57 Y·90 N·160 w:8.0

Direct (220), Athletics (5)

Taxpayers 219 P·1 C·133 Y·85 N·85 w:13.5

Transportation 201 P·2 C·47 Y·148 N·74 w:5.0

Direct (193), Foreign (2), Technology (2), Tourism (2), Moving (1), Research Vessels (1)

Click any row to see supporting clauses

Showing positive and negative-direction effects only. Mixed and uncertain effects are not included in these counts.

Votes by Industry (Yea/Nay Alignment)

How this legislator's Yea/Nay votes landed across industries; distinct from overall bill exposure above.

Analysis coverage

100.0% of votes

Show vote-alignment table

S+ Supported Benefits

S- Supported Burdens

O+ Opposed Benefits

O- Opposed Burdens

Industry	S+	S-	Net
Government (73 sub) Sub-categories (total impacts, all buckets): Defense (229), Veterans Affairs (180), Coast Guard (36), DoD (33), EPA (31) +68 more			-435
General Public (8 sub) Sub-categories (total impacts, all buckets): Veterans (141), Military Families (17), Family Sponsors (4), Military (3), Foreign (2) +3 more			-200
Military (4 sub) Sub-categories (total impacts, all buckets): Intercontinental Ballistic Missile Systems (3), Air Force (2), Families (1), Space Force (1)			-117
Defense (14 sub) Sub-categories (total impacts, all buckets): Naval (2), Nuclear (2), Testing (2), Ammunition (1), Ground Vehicles (1) +9 more			-90
Healthcare (5 sub) Sub-categories (total impacts, all buckets): Research (15), Community (3), Tribal (3), Family Planning Services (2), Public Health (2)			+3
Education (6 sub) Sub-categories (total impacts, all buckets): Child Care (3), Maritime Training (2), Immigrant Students (1), Religious Studies (1), Research Universities (1) +1 more			+29
Cryptocurrency	-	-	-71
Transportation (6 sub) Sub-categories (total impacts, all buckets): Foreign (2), Labor (2), Technology (2), Tourism (2), Moving (1) +1 more			+12
Financial Services (1 sub) Sub-categories (total impacts, all buckets): HSA (7)			-117
State & Local Government (2 sub) Sub-categories (total impacts, all buckets): Medicaid (6), Non-Expansion (3)			+43
Construction (4 sub) Sub-categories (total impacts, all buckets): Federal Projects (1), Federal/Military (1), Military/Pacific (1), Utilities/Infrastructure (1)		-	-92
Manufacturing (4 sub) Sub-categories (total impacts, all buckets): Foreign (8), Electrical Equipment (2), Defense (1), Foreign Adversary (1)			-7
Taxpayers	-	-	-15
Agriculture (6 sub) Sub-categories (total impacts, all buckets): Coffee (2), Commodities (2), Hemp (2), Livestock (2), Coffee Production (1) +1 more			-133
Law Enforcement			-26

Votes are cast on entire bills; attribution to individual clauses does not imply clause-level intent. Learn more

Loading votes...