HR7599-119

In Committee

Federal Extreme Risk Protection Order Act of 2026

119th Congress Introduced Feb 17, 2026

Summary

What This Bill Does

The Federal Extreme Risk Protection Order Act of 2026 builds a federal red-flag-order system around federal courts and firearm background-check enforcement. A law enforcement officer or family petitioner may ask a U.S. district court for an ex parte or long-term federal order when a respondent poses a risk of personal injury by purchasing, possessing, or receiving firearms or ammunition. Ex parte orders require a sworn affidavit and probable cause, last no more than 14 days, and lead to a fast long-term hearing. Long-term orders require notice, an opportunity to be heard, possible court-assisted counsel, and clear and convincing evidence, and can last up to 180 days with renewal procedures. Once an order issues, the respondent must surrender firearms, ammunition, and permits to the U.S. Marshals Service or a designated law enforcement officer; receipts must be filed; attempted access can trigger forfeiture; and items are returned only after NICS and other database checks confirm lawful possession. The bill amends federal firearms law to prohibit sales to and possession by people under federal or qualifying state ERPOs, requires the Attorney General and courts to update background-check databases, authorizes DOJ COPS grants for states, tribes, local governments, and public or private entities implementing qualifying ERPO laws, requires training and annual reporting, preserves state law, and requires full faith and credit for compliant state and tribal orders.

Who Benefits and How

Family petitioners, law enforcement petitioners, domestic violence survivors, suicide-prevention advocates, state ERPO programs, tribal ERPO programs, and community organizations benefit from a federal court pathway, DOJ grant funding, training, database enforcement, and cross-jurisdiction recognition of qualifying orders.

Who Bears the Burden and How

ERPO respondents must answer court petitions, attend hearings, surrender firearms, ammunition, and permits, and wait for NICS checks before return. Firearm dealers must deny transfers to covered respondents, U.S. district courts must hold fast hearings and send database notices, the U.S. Marshals Service must serve orders and store surrendered items, DOJ COPS must run grants, and federal law enforcement agencies plus state and tribal ERPO courts must train staff, update records, and report outcomes.

Key Provisions

  • Creates federal ex parte and long-term extreme risk protection orders in U.S. district courts with affidavit, probable-cause, hearing, counsel, and clear-and-convincing-evidence requirements.
  • Requires respondents subject to federal ERPOs to surrender firearms, ammunition, and permits to the U.S. Marshals Service or a designated law enforcement officer.
  • Bars firearm sales to and possession by people subject to federal or qualifying state extreme risk protection orders.
  • Authorizes DOJ COPS grants for states, tribes, local governments, and entities implementing ERPO laws, training, protocols, public awareness, and firearm-removal systems.
  • Requires ERPO records in background-check and national crime information databases and full faith and credit for qualifying state and tribal orders.

Evidence Chain:

This summary is generated from the full bill text using AI analysis. Expand "Detailed Analysis" below for identified beneficiaries/burden bearers with clause-level evidence links.

At a Glance

What This Bill Does

Creates a federal extreme risk protection order process in U.S. district courts, bars firearm sales and possession for people subject to federal or qualifying state ERPOs, funds state and tribal ERPO implementation through DOJ COPS grants, requires NICS and national crime database updates, gives state and tribal ERPOs full faith and credit, and penalizes knowingly false or frivolous petitions.

Key Policy Areas

Public Safety, Firearms, Courts, Criminal Justice

Primary Purpose

Creates a federal extreme risk protection order process in U.S. district courts, bars firearm sales and possession for people subject to federal or qualifying state ERPOs, funds state and tribal ERPO implementation through DOJ COPS grants, requires NICS and national crime database updates, gives state and tribal ERPOs full faith and credit, and penalizes knowingly false or frivolous petitions.

Policy Domains

Public Safety Firearms Courts Criminal Justice

Bill-wide scope

Identified Gains
  • Family petitioners
  • Law enforcement petitioners
  • Domestic violence survivors
  • Suicide-prevention advocates
  • State ERPO programs
  • Tribal ERPO programs
  • Community organizations
Model: codex-gpt-5 | Version: bill_summary_v2 | Source: ih
Family petitioners: , , , , , ,
State ERPO programs: , , , , , ,
Tribal ERPO programs: , , , , , ,
Community organizations: , , , , , ,
Domestic violence survivors: , , , , , ,
Law enforcement petitioners: , , , , , ,
Suicide-prevention advocates: , , , , , ,
Identified Costs
  • ERPO respondents
  • Firearm dealers
  • U.S. district courts
  • U.S. Marshals Service
  • DOJ COPS
  • Federal law enforcement agencies
  • State ERPO courts
  • Tribal ERPO courts
Model: codex-gpt-5 | Version: bill_summary_v2 | Source: ih
DOJ COPS: , , , , , ,
Firearm dealers: , , , , , ,
ERPO respondents: , , , , , ,
State ERPO courts: , , , , , ,
Tribal ERPO courts: , , , , , ,
U.S. district courts: , , , , , ,
U.S. Marshals Service: , , , , , ,
Federal law enforcement agencies: , , , , , ,

Legislative Progress

In Committee
Introduced Committee Passed
Feb 17, 2026

Introduced in House

Feb 17, 2026

Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.

Feb 17, 2026

Mrs. McBath (for herself, Mr. Moskowitz, Mr. Carbajal, Ms. Sewell, …

Stakeholder Effects

cui bono?

How this legislation distributes effects. Mention counts reflect frequency, not effect magnitude.

General Public
15 mentions across 6 clauses
+6 positive -9 negative

Background-check administrators, Community organizations, Domestic violence survivors

Positive-direction: Community organizations, Domestic violence survivors, ERPO petitioners, Family petitioners, Law enforcement petitioners

Negative-direction: Background-check administrators, ERPO respondents, NICS administrators, National crime information databases

Government
9 mentions across 5 clauses
+3 positive -6 negative

Attorney General, DOJ COPS, Federal criminal justice agencies

Positive-direction: Tribal ERPO petitioners, Tribal ERPO programs, Tribal courts

Negative-direction: Attorney General, DOJ COPS, Federal criminal justice agencies, Federal law enforcement agencies, U.S. Marshals Service

Courts
6 mentions across 4 clauses
-6 negative

Enforcing state courts, Enforcing tribal courts, Federal court administrators

State & Local Government
4 mentions across 3 clauses
+3 positive -1 negative

Local ERPO programs, State ERPO petitioners, State ERPO programs

Positive-direction: Local ERPO programs, State ERPO petitioners, State ERPO programs

Negative-direction: State criminal justice agencies

Retail
1 mention across 1 clause
-1 negative

Firearm dealers

Healthcare
1 mention across 1 clause
+1 positive

Suicide-prevention advocates

7/10
sections analyzed
Full impact breakdown

Bill Structure & Actor Mappings

Who is "The Secretary" in each section?

Domains
Public Safety Firearms Courts Criminal Justice
Actor Mappings
"COPS"
→ Office of Community Oriented Policing Services
"ERPO"
→ Extreme risk protection order
"NICS"
→ National Instant Criminal Background Check System
"primary_beneficiaries"
→ Family petitioners, Law enforcement petitioners, Domestic violence survivors, Suicide-prevention advocates, State ERPO programs, Tribal ERPO programs, Community organizations
"primary_burden_bearers"
→ ERPO respondents, Firearm dealers, U.S. district courts, U.S. Marshals Service, DOJ COPS, Federal law enforcement agencies, State ERPO courts, Tribal ERPO courts

We use a combination of our own taxonomy and classification in addition to large language models to assess meaning and potential beneficiaries. High confidence means strong textual evidence. Always verify with the original bill text.

Learn more about our methodology