Healthcare
79 bills 259 analyzed clauses
Explore affected groups
R SC-3 · House
Policy Effects
Estimated effects on people, organizations, and industries in bills this legislator sponsored, cosponsored, or voted on. Includes bills they voted against.
These are assessments of legislative text, not measurements of realized outcomes or the legislator’s intent.
This selection could not be loaded. Your current view is still available.
Open the requested selection in a full pageStart with a policy area to see the specific groups affected.
79 bills 259 analyzed clauses
Explore affected groups73 bills 199 analyzed clauses
Explore affected groups62 bills 368 analyzed clauses
Explore affected groups50 bills 144 analyzed clauses
Explore affected groups37 bills 107 analyzed clauses
Explore affected groups35 bills 225 analyzed clauses
Explore affected groups34 bills 159 analyzed clauses
Explore affected groups31 bills 145 analyzed clauses
Explore affected groups25 bills 79 analyzed clauses
Explore affected groups25 bills 42 analyzed clauses
Explore affected groups23 bills 63 analyzed clauses
Explore affected groups21 bills 65 analyzed clauses
Explore affected groups21 bills 35 analyzed clauses
Explore affected groups18 bills 30 analyzed clauses
Explore affected groups16 bills 25 analyzed clauses
Explore affected groups16 bills 25 analyzed clauses
Explore affected groups13 bills 32 analyzed clauses
Explore affected groups10 bills 50 analyzed clauses
Explore affected groups9 bills 28 analyzed clauses
Explore affected groups8 bills 33 analyzed clauses
Explore affected groups7 bills 10 analyzed clauses
Explore affected groups5 bills 23 analyzed clauses
Explore affected groups5 bills 7 analyzed clauses
Explore affected groups5 bills 6 analyzed clauses
Explore affected groups4 bills 35 analyzed clauses
Explore affected groups4 bills 7 analyzed clauses
Explore affected groups3 bills 4 analyzed clauses
Explore affected groups2 bills 6 analyzed clauses
Explore affected groups2 bills 5 analyzed clauses
Explore affected groups2 bills 4 analyzed clauses
Explore affected groups2 bills 3 analyzed clauses
Explore affected groups2 bills 3 analyzed clauses
Explore affected groups2 bills 2 analyzed clauses
Explore affected groups1 bill 50 analyzed clauses
Explore affected groups1 bill 9 analyzed clauses
Explore affected groups1 bill 6 analyzed clauses
Explore affected groups1 bill 5 analyzed clauses
Explore affected groups1 bill 4 analyzed clauses
Explore affected groups1 bill 2 analyzed clauses
Explore affected groups1 bill 2 analyzed clauses
Explore affected groups1 bill 2 analyzed clauses
Explore affected groups1 bill 1 analyzed clause
Explore affected groups1 bill 1 analyzed clause
Explore affected groups1 bill 1 analyzed clause
Explore affected groups1 bill 1 analyzed clause
Explore affected groupsPotential benefits are effects assessed as favorable to the named group. Potential burdens impose costs, restrictions, risks, or lost opportunities on that group.
Mixed effects contain countervailing effects on the same group. Unclear effects have an undetermined direction. A group can have separate benefits and burdens; these are counted separately.
Counts describe the number of identified effects, not their size or public value. Bill and clause counts are distinct within each view. Shared evidence may appear under several groups or policy areas, so their counts should not be added together.
Historical bill versions are included. Clauses analyzed in different versions count separately. A bill’s current status does not establish that every analyzed provision was enacted.
Only direct effects with high or medium confidence in the policy-area assignment are included. Bills are connected through sponsorship, cosponsorship, or Yea/Nay votes; a vote against a bill does not reverse its assessed effects. Vote dates filter recorded votes and vote-linked bills; sponsorship remains included.
Commemorating the 50th anniversary of the establishment of the National Wild Turkey Federation and recognizing its significant contributions to scientific wildlife management, research, and habitat conservation, as well as promoting and protecting the long-honored outdoor traditions of the United States.
To remove legal impediments preventing construction of a border barrier along the international border between the United States and Mexico, improve the construction requirements for such barrier, make previously appropriated funds available for constructing such barrier until expended, and for other purposes.
To improve the collection of intelligence regarding activities by drug trafficking organizations in certain foreign countries.
To prohibit the use of Federal funds to close or realign the Marine Corps Recruit Depot located at Parris Island, South Carolina, and for other purposes.
To amend title 18, United States Code, to prohibit the unlawful disposal of fetal remains.
Loading countries...
Select a clause to see detailed analysis
Failed to load analysis
Please try again
Failed to load clauses
Please try again
Explore affected groups in Policy Effects to view supporting evidence. Existing clause links also open here.
Select a clause to see detailed analysis