Healthcare
158 bills 386 analyzed clauses
Explore affected groups
R IN · Senate
Policy Effects
Estimated effects on people, organizations, and industries in bills this legislator sponsored, cosponsored, or voted on. Includes bills they voted against.
These are assessments of legislative text, not measurements of realized outcomes or the legislator’s intent.
This selection could not be loaded. Your current view is still available.
Open the requested selection in a full pageStart with a policy area to see the specific groups affected.
158 bills 386 analyzed clauses
Explore affected groups157 bills 364 analyzed clauses
Explore affected groups131 bills 273 analyzed clauses
Explore affected groups128 bills 250 analyzed clauses
Explore affected groups97 bills 186 analyzed clauses
Explore affected groups80 bills 164 analyzed clauses
Explore affected groups76 bills 171 analyzed clauses
Explore affected groups66 bills 114 analyzed clauses
Explore affected groups65 bills 135 analyzed clauses
Explore affected groups45 bills 75 analyzed clauses
Explore affected groups43 bills 110 analyzed clauses
Explore affected groups41 bills 105 analyzed clauses
Explore affected groups39 bills 89 analyzed clauses
Explore affected groups31 bills 55 analyzed clauses
Explore affected groups30 bills 44 analyzed clauses
Explore affected groups25 bills 42 analyzed clauses
Explore affected groups20 bills 45 analyzed clauses
Explore affected groups18 bills 32 analyzed clauses
Explore affected groups17 bills 41 analyzed clauses
Explore affected groups16 bills 41 analyzed clauses
Explore affected groups12 bills 32 analyzed clauses
Explore affected groups10 bills 16 analyzed clauses
Explore affected groups9 bills 21 analyzed clauses
Explore affected groups9 bills 18 analyzed clauses
Explore affected groups9 bills 16 analyzed clauses
Explore affected groups7 bills 12 analyzed clauses
Explore affected groups6 bills 9 analyzed clauses
Explore affected groups5 bills 16 analyzed clauses
Explore affected groups5 bills 13 analyzed clauses
Explore affected groups3 bills 39 analyzed clauses
Explore affected groups3 bills 3 analyzed clauses
Explore affected groups3 bills 3 analyzed clauses
Explore affected groups2 bills 34 analyzed clauses
Explore affected groups2 bills 4 analyzed clauses
Explore affected groups2 bills 3 analyzed clauses
Explore affected groups2 bills 2 analyzed clauses
Explore affected groups1 bill 12 analyzed clauses
Explore affected groups1 bill 10 analyzed clauses
Explore affected groups1 bill 9 analyzed clauses
Explore affected groups1 bill 8 analyzed clauses
Explore affected groups1 bill 7 analyzed clauses
Explore affected groups1 bill 5 analyzed clauses
Explore affected groups1 bill 4 analyzed clauses
Explore affected groups1 bill 3 analyzed clauses
Explore affected groups1 bill 3 analyzed clauses
Explore affected groups1 bill 2 analyzed clauses
Explore affected groups1 bill 2 analyzed clauses
Explore affected groups1 bill 2 analyzed clauses
Explore affected groups1 bill 2 analyzed clauses
Explore affected groups1 bill 2 analyzed clauses
Explore affected groups1 bill 2 analyzed clauses
Explore affected groups1 bill 2 analyzed clauses
Explore affected groups1 bill 2 analyzed clauses
Explore affected groups1 bill 2 analyzed clauses
Explore affected groups1 bill 1 analyzed clause
Explore affected groups1 bill 1 analyzed clause
Explore affected groups1 bill 1 analyzed clause
Explore affected groups1 bill 1 analyzed clause
Explore affected groupsPotential benefits are effects assessed as favorable to the named group. Potential burdens impose costs, restrictions, risks, or lost opportunities on that group.
Mixed effects contain countervailing effects on the same group. Unclear effects have an undetermined direction. A group can have separate benefits and burdens; these are counted separately.
Counts describe the number of identified effects, not their size or public value. Bill and clause counts are distinct within each view. Shared evidence may appear under several groups or policy areas, so their counts should not be added together.
Historical bill versions are included. Clauses analyzed in different versions count separately. A bill’s current status does not establish that every analyzed provision was enacted.
Only direct effects with high or medium confidence in the policy-area assignment are included. Bills are connected through sponsorship, cosponsorship, or Yea/Nay votes; a vote against a bill does not reverse its assessed effects. Vote dates filter recorded votes and vote-linked bills; sponsorship remains included.
To amend title 5, United States Code, to clarify the nature of judicial review of agency interpretations of statutory and regulatory provisions.
Designating the week of May 12 through May 18, 2024, as National Police Week.
To secure the borders of the United States, and for other purposes.
To require the Director of the Bureau of Prisons to be appointed by and with the advice and consent of the Senate.
To make the assault of a law enforcement officer a deportable offense, and for other purposes.
Designating the week of May 14 through May 20, 2023, as National Police Week.
To protect law enforcement officers, and for other purposes.
To provide incentives for States to recover fraudulently paid Federal and State unemployment compensation, and for other purposes.
To impose sanctions with respect to trafficking of illicit fentanyl and its precursors by transnational criminal organizations, including cartels, and for other purposes.
To require the Director of the Bureau of Justice Statistics to submit to Congress a report relating to individuals granted bail and pretrial release in State courts, and for other purposes.
To establish Department of Homeland Security funding restrictions on institutions of higher education that have a relationship with Confucius Institutes, and for other purposes.
To ensure that State and local law enforcement officers are permitted to cooperate with Federal officials to protect our communities from violent criminals and suspected terrorists who are illegally present in the United States.
To provide that the Federal Communications Commission may not prevent a State or Federal correctional facility from utilizing jamming equipment, and for other purposes.
To extend the statute of limitations for fraud by individuals under the COVID–19 unemployment programs.
To amend section 230 of the Communications Act of 1934 to correct shortcomings in how that section addresses content moderation, content creation and development, and content distribution.
To require the Secretary of Health and Human Services to collect and disseminate information on concussion and traumatic brain injury among public safety officers.
To secure the dignity and safety of incarcerated women.
Designating March 9, 2023, as National Slam the Scam Day to raise awareness about pervasive government imposter scams, and to promote education to prevent government imposter scams.
To enhance safety requirements for trains transporting hazardous materials, and for other purposes.
To amend title 18, United States Code, to require the impaneling of a new jury if a jury fails to recommend by unanimous vote a sentence for conviction of a crime punishable by death.
Loading countries...
Select a clause to see detailed analysis
Failed to load analysis
Please try again
Failed to load clauses
Please try again
Explore affected groups in Policy Effects to view supporting evidence. Existing clause links also open here.
Select a clause to see detailed analysis