Healthcare
158 bills 386 analyzed clauses
Explore affected groups
R IN · Senate
Policy Effects
Estimated effects on people, organizations, and industries in bills this legislator sponsored, cosponsored, or voted on. Includes bills they voted against.
These are assessments of legislative text, not measurements of realized outcomes or the legislator’s intent.
This selection could not be loaded. Your current view is still available.
Open the requested selection in a full pageStart with a policy area to see the specific groups affected.
158 bills 386 analyzed clauses
Explore affected groups157 bills 364 analyzed clauses
Explore affected groups131 bills 273 analyzed clauses
Explore affected groups128 bills 250 analyzed clauses
Explore affected groups97 bills 186 analyzed clauses
Explore affected groups80 bills 164 analyzed clauses
Explore affected groups76 bills 171 analyzed clauses
Explore affected groups66 bills 114 analyzed clauses
Explore affected groups65 bills 135 analyzed clauses
Explore affected groups45 bills 75 analyzed clauses
Explore affected groups43 bills 110 analyzed clauses
Explore affected groups41 bills 105 analyzed clauses
Explore affected groups39 bills 89 analyzed clauses
Explore affected groups31 bills 55 analyzed clauses
Explore affected groups30 bills 44 analyzed clauses
Explore affected groups25 bills 42 analyzed clauses
Explore affected groups20 bills 45 analyzed clauses
Explore affected groups18 bills 32 analyzed clauses
Explore affected groups17 bills 41 analyzed clauses
Explore affected groups16 bills 41 analyzed clauses
Explore affected groups12 bills 32 analyzed clauses
Explore affected groups10 bills 16 analyzed clauses
Explore affected groups9 bills 21 analyzed clauses
Explore affected groups9 bills 18 analyzed clauses
Explore affected groups9 bills 16 analyzed clauses
Explore affected groups7 bills 12 analyzed clauses
Explore affected groups6 bills 9 analyzed clauses
Explore affected groups5 bills 16 analyzed clauses
Explore affected groups5 bills 13 analyzed clauses
Explore affected groups3 bills 39 analyzed clauses
Explore affected groups3 bills 3 analyzed clauses
Explore affected groups3 bills 3 analyzed clauses
Explore affected groups2 bills 34 analyzed clauses
Explore affected groups2 bills 4 analyzed clauses
Explore affected groups2 bills 3 analyzed clauses
Explore affected groups2 bills 2 analyzed clauses
Explore affected groups1 bill 12 analyzed clauses
Explore affected groups1 bill 10 analyzed clauses
Explore affected groups1 bill 9 analyzed clauses
Explore affected groups1 bill 8 analyzed clauses
Explore affected groups1 bill 7 analyzed clauses
Explore affected groups1 bill 5 analyzed clauses
Explore affected groups1 bill 4 analyzed clauses
Explore affected groups1 bill 3 analyzed clauses
Explore affected groups1 bill 3 analyzed clauses
Explore affected groups1 bill 2 analyzed clauses
Explore affected groups1 bill 2 analyzed clauses
Explore affected groups1 bill 2 analyzed clauses
Explore affected groups1 bill 2 analyzed clauses
Explore affected groups1 bill 2 analyzed clauses
Explore affected groups1 bill 2 analyzed clauses
Explore affected groups1 bill 2 analyzed clauses
Explore affected groups1 bill 2 analyzed clauses
Explore affected groups1 bill 2 analyzed clauses
Explore affected groups1 bill 1 analyzed clause
Explore affected groups1 bill 1 analyzed clause
Explore affected groups1 bill 1 analyzed clause
Explore affected groups1 bill 1 analyzed clause
Explore affected groupsPotential benefits are effects assessed as favorable to the named group. Potential burdens impose costs, restrictions, risks, or lost opportunities on that group.
Mixed effects contain countervailing effects on the same group. Unclear effects have an undetermined direction. A group can have separate benefits and burdens; these are counted separately.
Counts describe the number of identified effects, not their size or public value. Bill and clause counts are distinct within each view. Shared evidence may appear under several groups or policy areas, so their counts should not be added together.
Historical bill versions are included. Clauses analyzed in different versions count separately. A bill’s current status does not establish that every analyzed provision was enacted.
Only direct effects with high or medium confidence in the policy-area assignment are included. Bills are connected through sponsorship, cosponsorship, or Yea/Nay votes; a vote against a bill does not reverse its assessed effects. Vote dates filter recorded votes and vote-linked bills; sponsorship remains included.
To amend the Higher Education Act of 1965 to require additional information in disclosures of foreign gifts and contracts from foreign sources, restrict contracts with certain foreign entities and foreign countries of concern, require certain staff and faculty to report foreign gifts and contracts, and require disclosure of certain foreign investments within endowments.
To require a strategy to counter the role of the People's Republic of China in evasion of sanctions imposed by the United States with respect to Iran, and for other purposes.
Loading countries...
Select a clause to see detailed analysis
Failed to load analysis
Please try again
Failed to load clauses
Please try again
Explore affected groups in Policy Effects to view supporting evidence. Existing clause links also open here.
Select a clause to see detailed analysis