Government Operations
67 bills 642 analyzed clauses
Explore affected groups
R NY-22 · House
Policy Effects
Estimated effects on people, organizations, and industries in bills this legislator sponsored, cosponsored, or voted on. Includes bills they voted against.
These are assessments of legislative text, not measurements of realized outcomes or the legislator’s intent.
This selection could not be loaded. Your current view is still available.
Open the requested selection in a full pageStart with a policy area to see the specific groups affected.
67 bills 642 analyzed clauses
Explore affected groups42 bills 402 analyzed clauses
Explore affected groups35 bills 349 analyzed clauses
Explore affected groups32 bills 564 analyzed clauses
Explore affected groups22 bills 53 analyzed clauses
Explore affected groups22 bills 30 analyzed clauses
Explore affected groups20 bills 71 analyzed clauses
Explore affected groups12 bills 46 analyzed clauses
Explore affected groups10 bills 18 analyzed clauses
Explore affected groups7 bills 25 analyzed clauses
Explore affected groups7 bills 18 analyzed clauses
Explore affected groups5 bills 21 analyzed clauses
Explore affected groups5 bills 16 analyzed clauses
Explore affected groups5 bills 9 analyzed clauses
Explore affected groups5 bills 8 analyzed clauses
Explore affected groups4 bills 9 analyzed clauses
Explore affected groups3 bills 7 analyzed clauses
Explore affected groups3 bills 5 analyzed clauses
Explore affected groups2 bills 2 analyzed clauses
Explore affected groups2 bills 2 analyzed clauses
Explore affected groups1 bill 21 analyzed clauses
Explore affected groups1 bill 12 analyzed clauses
Explore affected groups1 bill 6 analyzed clauses
Explore affected groups1 bill 5 analyzed clauses
Explore affected groups1 bill 2 analyzed clauses
Explore affected groups1 bill 1 analyzed clause
Explore affected groups1 bill 1 analyzed clause
Explore affected groups1 bill 1 analyzed clause
Explore affected groups1 bill 1 analyzed clause
Explore affected groups1 bill 1 analyzed clause
Explore affected groups1 bill 1 analyzed clause
Explore affected groups1 bill 1 analyzed clause
Explore affected groups1 bill 1 analyzed clause
Explore affected groupsPotential benefits are effects assessed as favorable to the named group. Potential burdens impose costs, restrictions, risks, or lost opportunities on that group.
Mixed effects contain countervailing effects on the same group. Unclear effects have an undetermined direction. A group can have separate benefits and burdens; these are counted separately.
Counts describe the number of identified effects, not their size or public value. Bill and clause counts are distinct within each view. Shared evidence may appear under several groups or policy areas, so their counts should not be added together.
Historical bill versions are included. Clauses analyzed in different versions count separately. A bill’s current status does not establish that every analyzed provision was enacted.
Only direct effects with high or medium confidence in the policy-area assignment are included. Bills are connected through sponsorship, cosponsorship, or Yea/Nay votes; a vote against a bill does not reverse its assessed effects. Vote dates filter recorded votes and vote-linked bills; sponsorship remains included.
To amend the Higher Education Act of 1965 to prohibit recognized accrediting agencies and associations from requiring, encouraging, or coercing institutions of higher education to meet any political litmus test or violate any right protected by the Constitution as a condition of accreditation.
To address the public safety issues and environmental destruction currently impacting Federal lands along the southern border, enhance border security through the construction of navigable roads on Federal lands along the southern border, provide U.S. Customs and Border Protection access to Federal lands to improve the safety and effectiveness of enforcement activities, allow States to place temporary barriers on Federal land to secure the southern border, reduce the massive trash accumulations and environmental degradation along the southern border, reduce the cultivation of illegal cannabis on Federal lands, mitigate wildland fires caused by illegal immigration, and prohibit migrant housing on Federal lands.
To amend the National Voter Registration Act of 1993 to require proof of United States citizenship to register an individual to vote in elections for Federal office, and for other purposes.
To amend the Higher Education Act of 1965 to prohibit graduate medical schools from receiving Federal financial assistance if such schools adopt certain policies and requirements relating to diversity, equity, and inclusion.
To amend the Higher Education Act of 1965 to require institutions of higher education to adopt and adhere to principles of free speech, and for other purposes.
To promote election integrity, voter confidence, and faith in elections by removing Federal impediments to, equipping States with tools for, and establishing voluntary considerations to support effective State administration of Federal elections, improving election administration in the District of Columbia, improving the effectiveness of military voting programs, enhancing election security, and protecting political speech, and for other purposes.
To provide for Department of Energy and Department of Agriculture joint research and development activities, and for other purposes.
To ensure the rights of parents are honored and protected in the Nation’s public schools.
Loading countries...
Select a clause to see detailed analysis
Failed to load analysis
Please try again
Failed to load clauses
Please try again
Explore affected groups in Policy Effects to view supporting evidence. Existing clause links also open here.
Select a clause to see detailed analysis