Back to Legislators
Mr. Armstrong

Mr. Armstrong

Policy Effects

Estimated effects on people, organizations, and industries in bills this legislator sponsored, cosponsored, or voted on. Includes bills they voted against.

These are assessments of legislative text, not measurements of realized outcomes or the legislator’s intent.

Department of the Interior IP licensees: supporting evidence

2 identified effects across 1 analyzed clause in 1 bill.

Numbers count identified effects. One clause can affect several groups or contain several effects.

S1547-119

Reported

America the Beautiful Act

Mr. Armstrong’s recorded connection

Cosponsored this bill

  • Potential benefit to Department of the Interior IP licensees

    More revenue opportunities

  • Potential burden on Department of the Interior IP licensees

    Higher costs

Summary unavailable

4. Licensing intellectual property In this section: The term Department means the Department of the Interior, including any bureau, office, and agency of the Department of the Interior. The term intellectual property means— any trademark, service mark, certification mark, or collective mark (as those terms are defined in section 45 of the Act entitled An Act to provide for the registration and pr…

Clause analysis

What the effects and counts mean

Potential benefits are effects assessed as favorable to the named group. Potential burdens impose costs, restrictions, risks, or lost opportunities on that group.

Mixed effects contain countervailing effects on the same group. Unclear effects have an undetermined direction. A group can have separate benefits and burdens; these are counted separately.

Counts describe the number of identified effects, not their size or public value. Bill and clause counts are distinct within each view. Shared evidence may appear under several groups or policy areas, so their counts should not be added together.

Historical bill versions are included. Clauses analyzed in different versions count separately. A bill’s current status does not establish that every analyzed provision was enacted.

Only direct effects with high or medium confidence in the policy-area assignment are included. Bills are connected through sponsorship, cosponsorship, or Yea/Nay votes; a vote against a bill does not reverse its assessed effects. Vote dates filter recorded votes and vote-linked bills; sponsorship remains included.

Loading countries...

Explore affected groups in Policy Effects to view supporting evidence. Existing clause links also open here.