Back to Legislators
Mr. Armstrong

Mr. Armstrong

Policy Effects

Estimated effects on people, organizations, and industries in bills this legislator sponsored, cosponsored, or voted on. Includes bills they voted against.

These are assessments of legislative text, not measurements of realized outcomes or the legislator’s intent.

Self-pay patients comparing cash prices: supporting evidence

9 identified effects across 9 analyzed clauses in 1 bill.

Numbers count identified effects. One clause can affect several groups or contain several effects.

S2355-119

Reported

Patients Deserve Price Tags Act

Mr. Armstrong’s recorded connection

Cosponsored this bill

  • Potential benefit to Self-pay patients comparing cash prices

    Lower costs

Summary unavailable

2718A. Provider price transparency In this section: The term applicable imaging provider means a provider of services or supplier who furnishes any imaging services to patients, including an independent diagnostic testing facility, an outpatient diagnostic facility, and any other imaging center designated by the Secretary, except that such term does not include an imaging service provider with re…
  • Potential benefit to Self-pay patients comparing cash prices

    Lower costs

Summary unavailable

4. Imaging services price transparency Section 2718A of the Public Health Service Act, as amended by section 3, is further amended by adding at the end the following: (d)Imaging services price transparency(1)In generalBeginning January 1 of the year that begins on or after the date that is 1 year after the date of enactment of the Patients Deserve Price Tags Act, each applicable imaging service p…
  • Potential benefit to Self-pay patients comparing cash prices

    Lower costs

Summary unavailable

5. Ambulatory surgical center price transparency Section 2718A of the Public Health Service Act, as amended by section 4, is further amended by adding at the end the following: (e)Ambulatory surgical center price transparency(1)In generalBeginning January 1 of the year that begins on or after the date that is 1 year after the date of enactment of the Patients Deserve Price Tags Act, each specifie…
  • Potential benefit to Self-pay patients comparing cash prices

    Lower costs

Summary unavailable

2. Strengthening hospital price transparency Title XXVII of the Public Health Service Act is amended by inserting after section 2718 (42 U.S.C. 300gg–18) the following: 2718A.Provider price transparency(a)DefinitionsIn this section:(1)Applicable imaging service providerThe term applicable imaging provider means a provider of services or supplier who furnishes any imaging services to patients, inc…
  • Potential benefit to Self-pay patients comparing cash prices

    Lower costs

Summary unavailable

3. Clinical diagnostic laboratory price transparency Section 2718A of the Public Health Service Act, as added by section 2, is amended by adding at the end the following: (c)Clinical diagnostic laboratory price transparency(1)In generalBeginning January 1 of the year that begins on or after the date that is 1 year after the date of enactment of the Patients Deserve Price Tags Act, an applicable l…
  • Potential benefit to Self-pay patients comparing cash prices

    Lower costs

This clause introduces a reporting or study requirement and a compliance mandate: Requires clinical diagnostic laboratories to publicly disclose pricing for all tests, including gross charges, cash prices, and payer-specific negotiated rates, beginning July 2027. It is likely beneficial for Healthcare consumers needing lab tests (cost down) and Self-pay patients (barrier to entry down). It likely creates costs, burdens, barriers, or risks for Clinical diagnostic laboratories (compliance burden up).

  • Potential benefit to Self-pay patients comparing cash prices

    Lower costs

This clause introduces a reporting or study requirement and a compliance mandate: Requires ambulatory surgical centers to publish pricing in machine-readable and consumer-friendly formats for at least 300 shoppable services, beginning July 2027. It is likely beneficial for Patients seeking outpatient surgical procedures (cost down). It likely creates costs, burdens, barriers, or risks for Ambulatory surgical centers (compliance burden up).

  • Potential benefit to Self-pay patients comparing cash prices

    Lower costs

This clause introduces a reporting or study requirement and a compliance mandate: Requires imaging service providers (not already covered by hospital transparency) to publish pricing for all imaging services, including gross charges and negotiated rates, beginning July 2027. It is likely beneficial for Healthcare consumers needing imaging services (cost down). It likely creates costs, burdens, barriers, or risks for Freestanding imaging centers and radiology providers (compliance burden up).

  • Potential benefit to Self-pay patients comparing cash prices

    Lower costs

This clause tightens a reporting or study requirement and a compliance mandate: Strengthens hospital price transparency by requiring monthly publication of standard charges for all items and services, including negotiated rates with payers, in both machine-readable and consumer-friendly formats. It is likely beneficial for Healthcare consumers and patients (cost down) and Self-pay patients seeking cash prices (barrier to entry down). It likely creates costs, burdens, barriers, or risks for Hospitals and hospital systems (compliance burden up).

Clause analysis

What the effects and counts mean

Potential benefits are effects assessed as favorable to the named group. Potential burdens impose costs, restrictions, risks, or lost opportunities on that group.

Mixed effects contain countervailing effects on the same group. Unclear effects have an undetermined direction. A group can have separate benefits and burdens; these are counted separately.

Counts describe the number of identified effects, not their size or public value. Bill and clause counts are distinct within each view. Shared evidence may appear under several groups or policy areas, so their counts should not be added together.

Historical bill versions are included. Clauses analyzed in different versions count separately. A bill’s current status does not establish that every analyzed provision was enacted.

Only direct effects with high or medium confidence in the policy-area assignment are included. Bills are connected through sponsorship, cosponsorship, or Yea/Nay votes; a vote against a bill does not reverse its assessed effects. Vote dates filter recorded votes and vote-linked bills; sponsorship remains included.

Loading countries...

Explore affected groups in Policy Effects to view supporting evidence. Existing clause links also open here.