Back to Legislators
Mr. Armstrong

Mr. Armstrong

Policy Effects

Estimated effects on people, organizations, and industries in bills this legislator sponsored, cosponsored, or voted on. Includes bills they voted against.

These are assessments of legislative text, not measurements of realized outcomes or the legislator’s intent.

Hospitals with persistent transparency violations: supporting evidence

3 identified effects across 3 analyzed clauses in 1 bill.

Numbers count identified effects. One clause can affect several groups or contain several effects.

S2355-119

Reported

Patients Deserve Price Tags Act

Mr. Armstrong’s recorded connection

Cosponsored this bill

  • Potential burden on Hospitals with persistent transparency violations

    Higher costs

Summary unavailable

2718A. Provider price transparency In this section: The term applicable imaging provider means a provider of services or supplier who furnishes any imaging services to patients, including an independent diagnostic testing facility, an outpatient diagnostic facility, and any other imaging center designated by the Secretary, except that such term does not include an imaging service provider with re…
  • Potential burden on Hospitals with persistent transparency violations

    Higher costs

Summary unavailable

2. Strengthening hospital price transparency Title XXVII of the Public Health Service Act is amended by inserting after section 2718 (42 U.S.C. 300gg–18) the following: 2718A.Provider price transparency(a)DefinitionsIn this section:(1)Applicable imaging service providerThe term applicable imaging provider means a provider of services or supplier who furnishes any imaging services to patients, inc…
  • Potential burden on Hospitals with persistent transparency violations

    Higher costs

This clause tightens a reporting or study requirement and a compliance mandate: Strengthens hospital price transparency by requiring monthly publication of standard charges for all items and services, including negotiated rates with payers, in both machine-readable and consumer-friendly formats. It is likely beneficial for Healthcare consumers and patients (cost down) and Self-pay patients seeking cash prices (barrier to entry down). It likely creates costs, burdens, barriers, or risks for Hospitals and hospital systems (compliance burden up).

Clause analysis

What the effects and counts mean

Potential benefits are effects assessed as favorable to the named group. Potential burdens impose costs, restrictions, risks, or lost opportunities on that group.

Mixed effects contain countervailing effects on the same group. Unclear effects have an undetermined direction. A group can have separate benefits and burdens; these are counted separately.

Counts describe the number of identified effects, not their size or public value. Bill and clause counts are distinct within each view. Shared evidence may appear under several groups or policy areas, so their counts should not be added together.

Historical bill versions are included. Clauses analyzed in different versions count separately. A bill’s current status does not establish that every analyzed provision was enacted.

Only direct effects with high or medium confidence in the policy-area assignment are included. Bills are connected through sponsorship, cosponsorship, or Yea/Nay votes; a vote against a bill does not reverse its assessed effects. Vote dates filter recorded votes and vote-linked bills; sponsorship remains included.

Loading countries...

Explore affected groups in Policy Effects to view supporting evidence. Existing clause links also open here.