Back to Legislators
Mr. Armstrong

Mr. Armstrong

Policy Effects

Estimated effects on people, organizations, and industries in bills this legislator sponsored, cosponsored, or voted on. Includes bills they voted against.

These are assessments of legislative text, not measurements of realized outcomes or the legislator’s intent.

Secretary of Agriculture: supporting evidence

3 identified effects across 3 analyzed clauses in 1 bill.

Numbers count identified effects. One clause can affect several groups or contain several effects.

S1547-119

Reported

America the Beautiful Act

Mr. Armstrong’s recorded connection

Cosponsored this bill

  • Potential burden on Secretary of Agriculture

    More compliance requirements

Summary unavailable

2. National Parks and Public Land Legacy Restoration Fund Section 200401 of title 54, United States Code, is amended— by redesignating paragraphs (3) and (4) as paragraphs (4) and (5), respectively; and by inserting after paragraph (2) the following: (3)Deferred maintenance(A)In generalThe term deferred maintenance means maintenance or a repair of an asset that—(i)was not performed when the maint…
  • Potential burden on Secretary of Agriculture

    More compliance requirements

Summary unavailable

2. Reuauthorization of the National Parks and Public Land Legacy Restoration Fund Section 200402(b) of title 54, United States Code, is amended— in paragraph (1), by striking 2025 and inserting 2033; and in paragraph (2), by striking $1,900,000,000 and inserting $2,000,000,000. Section 200402(e) of title 54, United States Code, is amended— in paragraph (1), in the matter preceding subparagraph (A…
  • Potential burden on Secretary of Agriculture

    More compliance requirements

Reduces a appropriation, reporting req, compliance mandate provision: 2. Reuauthorization of the National Parks and Public Land Legacy Restoration Fund Section 200402(b) of title 54, United States Code, is amended— in... In practical terms, schools, students, and education providers face revenue opp up (positive); Federal implementing agencies face compliance burden up (negative).

Clause analysis

What the effects and counts mean

Potential benefits are effects assessed as favorable to the named group. Potential burdens impose costs, restrictions, risks, or lost opportunities on that group.

Mixed effects contain countervailing effects on the same group. Unclear effects have an undetermined direction. A group can have separate benefits and burdens; these are counted separately.

Counts describe the number of identified effects, not their size or public value. Bill and clause counts are distinct within each view. Shared evidence may appear under several groups or policy areas, so their counts should not be added together.

Historical bill versions are included. Clauses analyzed in different versions count separately. A bill’s current status does not establish that every analyzed provision was enacted.

Only direct effects with high or medium confidence in the policy-area assignment are included. Bills are connected through sponsorship, cosponsorship, or Yea/Nay votes; a vote against a bill does not reverse its assessed effects. Vote dates filter recorded votes and vote-linked bills; sponsorship remains included.

Loading countries...

Explore affected groups in Policy Effects to view supporting evidence. Existing clause links also open here.