Back to Legislators
Mr. Armstrong

Mr. Armstrong

Policy Effects

Estimated effects on people, organizations, and industries in bills this legislator sponsored, cosponsored, or voted on. Includes bills they voted against.

These are assessments of legislative text, not measurements of realized outcomes or the legislator’s intent.

Third-party plan administrators: supporting evidence

9 identified effects across 9 analyzed clauses in 1 bill.

Numbers count identified effects. One clause can affect several groups or contain several effects.

S2355-119

Reported

Patients Deserve Price Tags Act

Mr. Armstrong’s recorded connection

Cosponsored this bill

  • Potential burden on Third-party plan administrators

    More compliance requirements

Summary unavailable

6. Strengthening health coverage transparency requirements Section 2715A of the Public Health Service Act (42 U.S.C. 300gg-15a) is amended— by striking A Group health and inserting the following: (a)In generalA group health; and A group health by ending at the end the following: (b)Additional transparency requirements(1)Specified information required(A)In generalA group health plan or health insu…
  • Potential burden on Third-party plan administrators

    More compliance requirements

Summary unavailable

8. Oversight of administrative service providers Part D of title XXVII of the Public Health Service Act (42 U.S.C. 300gg–111 et seq.), as amended by section 6701(a) of the Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2026, is amended by adding at the end the following: 2799A–12.Oversight of administrative service providers(a)In generalFor plan years beginning on or after January 1 of the year that begins on …
  • Potential burden on Third-party plan administrators

    More compliance requirements

Summary unavailable

7. Increasing group health plan access to health data Section 2799A-9 of the Public Health Service Act (42 U.S.C. 300gg-119) is amended by adding at the end the following: (1)Group Health Plan Access to Information(A)In generalNo contract or arrangement for services, and no extension or renewal of such contract or arrangement, between a group health plan that is offered by a specified large emplo…
  • Potential burden on Third-party plan administrators

    More compliance requirements

Summary unavailable

2799A–12. Oversight of administrative service providers For plan years beginning on or after January 1 of the year that begins on or after the date that is 1 year after the date of enactment of the Patients Deserve Price Tags Act, no agreement between a group health plan that is offered by a specified large employer or that is a specified large plan (as such terms are defined in section 2799A–11(…
  • Potential burden on Third-party plan administrators

    More compliance requirements

This clause introduces a compliance mandate and a reporting or study requirement: Prohibits ERISA group health plan service provider agreements that limit disclosure of pricing and claims information, requiring quarterly disclosure of methodologies, rebates, and fees. It is likely beneficial for Self-insured employers and plan sponsors (cost down). It likely creates costs, burdens, barriers, or risks for Pharmacy benefit managers (compliance burden up) and Third-party administrators (compliance burden up).

  • Potential burden on Third-party plan administrators

    More compliance requirements

This clause introduces a compliance mandate and a reporting or study requirement: Extends administrative service provider oversight requirements to self-funded non-Federal governmental health plans, requiring quarterly disclosure of pricing and rebate information. It is likely beneficial for State and local government health plan sponsors (cost down). It likely creates costs, burdens, barriers, or risks for Health plan service providers serving governmental plans (compliance burden up) and Pharmacy benefit managers serving governmental plans (compliance burden up).

  • Potential burden on Third-party plan administrators

    More compliance requirements

This clause introduces a compliance mandate and a reporting or study requirement: Codifies Section 726 oversight requirements for ERISA administrative service providers including disclosure of pricing formulas and rebate information to health plans. It is likely beneficial for Group health plan sponsors (cost down). It likely creates costs, burdens, barriers, or risks for Health plan service providers and TPAs (compliance burden up) and Pharmacy benefit managers (compliance burden up).

  • Potential burden on Third-party plan administrators

    More compliance requirements

This clause introduces a compliance mandate and a reporting or study requirement: Requires group health plan service contracts to provide plan fiduciaries access to all claims data, pricing methodologies, and prohibits contracts that restrict such access. It is likely beneficial for Self-insured employer health plan sponsors (revenue opp up). It likely creates costs, burdens, barriers, or risks for Pharmacy benefit managers (compliance burden up), Third-party administrators (compliance burden up), and Healthcare provider networks (compliance burden up).

  • Potential burden on Third-party plan administrators

    More compliance requirements

This clause tightens a reporting or study requirement and a compliance mandate: Strengthens health plan transparency requirements by mandating disclosure of in-network rates, maximum allowed amounts for out-of-network, and patient cost-sharing through self-service tools. It is likely beneficial for Individual health insurance consumers (cost down). It likely creates costs, burdens, barriers, or risks for Health insurance exchanges and qualified health plans (compliance burden up).

Clause analysis

What the effects and counts mean

Potential benefits are effects assessed as favorable to the named group. Potential burdens impose costs, restrictions, risks, or lost opportunities on that group.

Mixed effects contain countervailing effects on the same group. Unclear effects have an undetermined direction. A group can have separate benefits and burdens; these are counted separately.

Counts describe the number of identified effects, not their size or public value. Bill and clause counts are distinct within each view. Shared evidence may appear under several groups or policy areas, so their counts should not be added together.

Historical bill versions are included. Clauses analyzed in different versions count separately. A bill’s current status does not establish that every analyzed provision was enacted.

Only direct effects with high or medium confidence in the policy-area assignment are included. Bills are connected through sponsorship, cosponsorship, or Yea/Nay votes; a vote against a bill does not reverse its assessed effects. Vote dates filter recorded votes and vote-linked bills; sponsorship remains included.

Loading countries...

Explore affected groups in Policy Effects to view supporting evidence. Existing clause links also open here.