Environment
15 bills 37 analyzed clauses
Explore affected groups
R UT-2 · House
Policy Effects
Estimated effects on people, organizations, and industries in bills this legislator sponsored, cosponsored, or voted on. Includes bills they voted against.
These are assessments of legislative text, not measurements of realized outcomes or the legislator’s intent.
This selection could not be loaded. Your current view is still available.
Open the requested selection in a full pageStart with a policy area to see the specific groups affected.
15 bills 37 analyzed clauses
Explore affected groups12 bills 46 analyzed clauses
Explore affected groups11 bills 51 analyzed clauses
Explore affected groups11 bills 24 analyzed clauses
Explore affected groups10 bills 24 analyzed clauses
Explore affected groups10 bills 20 analyzed clauses
Explore affected groups9 bills 22 analyzed clauses
Explore affected groups9 bills 21 analyzed clauses
Explore affected groups9 bills 12 analyzed clauses
Explore affected groups6 bills 11 analyzed clauses
Explore affected groups6 bills 7 analyzed clauses
Explore affected groups5 bills 17 analyzed clauses
Explore affected groups5 bills 15 analyzed clauses
Explore affected groups4 bills 9 analyzed clauses
Explore affected groups3 bills 4 analyzed clauses
Explore affected groups3 bills 3 analyzed clauses
Explore affected groups2 bills 5 analyzed clauses
Explore affected groups2 bills 4 analyzed clauses
Explore affected groups2 bills 3 analyzed clauses
Explore affected groups2 bills 2 analyzed clauses
Explore affected groups1 bill 8 analyzed clauses
Explore affected groups1 bill 5 analyzed clauses
Explore affected groups1 bill 2 analyzed clauses
Explore affected groups1 bill 2 analyzed clauses
Explore affected groups1 bill 2 analyzed clauses
Explore affected groups1 bill 1 analyzed clause
Explore affected groups1 bill 1 analyzed clause
Explore affected groups1 bill 1 analyzed clause
Explore affected groupsPotential benefits are effects assessed as favorable to the named group. Potential burdens impose costs, restrictions, risks, or lost opportunities on that group.
Mixed effects contain countervailing effects on the same group. Unclear effects have an undetermined direction. A group can have separate benefits and burdens; these are counted separately.
Counts describe the number of identified effects, not their size or public value. Bill and clause counts are distinct within each view. Shared evidence may appear under several groups or policy areas, so their counts should not be added together.
Historical bill versions are included. Clauses analyzed in different versions count separately. A bill’s current status does not establish that every analyzed provision was enacted.
Only direct effects with high or medium confidence in the policy-area assignment are included. Bills are connected through sponsorship, cosponsorship, or Yea/Nay votes; a vote against a bill does not reverse its assessed effects. Vote dates filter recorded votes and vote-linked bills; sponsorship remains included.
To require the Director of the Bureau of Land Management to withdraw a rule of the Bureau of Land Management relating to conservation and landscape health.
To require the Secretary of Energy to provide technology grants to strengthen domestic mining education, and for other purposes.
To amend chapter 8 of title 5, United States Code, to provide that major rules of the executive branch shall have no force or effect unless a joint resolution of approval is enacted into law.
To improve the permitting process for mining on Federal land, and for other purposes.
Loading countries...
Select a clause to see detailed analysis
Failed to load analysis
Please try again
Failed to load clauses
Please try again
Explore affected groups in Policy Effects to view supporting evidence. Existing clause links also open here.
Select a clause to see detailed analysis