Back to Legislators

Bradley Scott Schneider

Analysis

D IL-10 · House

2025–Present House Of Representatives (District 10)

2023–2025 House Of Representatives (District 10)

2021–2023 House Of Representatives (District 10)

2019–2021 House Of Representatives (District 10)

2017–2019 House Of Representatives (District 10)

2013–2015 House Of Representatives (District 10)

Defense

+131

Helped 1309 Hurt 1178 Mixed 1 Unclear 805

Finance

+204

Helped 935 Hurt 731 Mixed 4 Unclear 361

Healthcare

+397

Helped 814 Hurt 417 Unclear 669

Energy

-23

Helped 365 Hurt 388 Mixed 3 Unclear 274

Education

+40

Helped 386 Hurt 346 Unclear 188

Criminal Justice

-119

Helped 290 Hurt 409 Mixed 4 Unclear 65

Veterans Affairs

+287

Helped 440 Hurt 153 Unclear 105

Agriculture

+151

Helped 328 Hurt 177 Unclear 115

Transportation

-15

Helped 235 Hurt 250 Unclear 135

Labor

+43

Helped 226 Hurt 183 Unclear 164

Trade

+15

Helped 248 Hurt 233 Mixed 2 Unclear 88

Government Operations

Helped 59 Hurt 57 Unclear 405

Housing

+50

Helped 221 Hurt 171 Unclear 37

Immigration

-184

Helped 81 Hurt 265 Mixed 4 Unclear 58

Technology

+54

Helped 204 Hurt 150 Unclear 51

Military Procurement

+17

Helped 142 Hurt 125 Unclear 101

Environment

-80

Helped 80 Hurt 160 Unclear 124

Foreign Affairs

-109

Helped 95 Hurt 204 Unclear 50

Foreign Policy

+18

Helped 155 Hurt 137 Unclear 42

Federal Budget

+162

Helped 207 Hurt 45 Unclear 36

20 policy domains

Helped Hurt Mixed Unclear

Industry Impact Profile

20870 industry impacts

All entities →

How this is computed

P Primary sponsor · C Co-sponsor · Y Yea vote · N Nay vote

Weighted score (w:) uses strongest role per bill. Weights: Primary 1.0, Co-sponsor 0.3, Yea 0.1, Nay -0.1.

Bills where the legislator voted nay (without sponsorship) contribute -0.1 per bill. Equal yea and nay roll calls on the same bill contribute 0.

Vote date filters affect vote attribution; sponsorship is always included.

Positive-Effect Industries

Government 2396 P·6 C·144 Y·2225 N·1473 w:15.3

Direct (1865), Defense (128), Veterans Affairs (114), DoD (32), State (23), Legislative Branch (21), VA (19), Executive (16), USDA (16), Congress (14), Legislative (14), Treasury (13), Agriculture (11), Coast Guard (9), NPS (7), CMS (6), Justice (6), Oversight (6), DOJ (4), Education (4), Foreign Affairs (4), ICE (4), Judiciary (4), Local (4), Research (4), Medicare (3), State & Local (3), Transportation (3), Army Corps (2), Cemeteries (2), DHS (2), FDA (2), FEMA (2), Housing (2), Interior/USDA (2), International Development (2), Military Logistics (2), NASA (2), NOAA (2), SBA (2), SSA (2), Defense R&D (1), EPA (1), Federal Executive (1), Federal Law Enforcement (1), Federal Workforce (1), HHS (1), IBWC (1), Intelligence (1), Judicial (1), Manufacturing (1), Municipal (1), National Security (1), Tribal (1)

General Public 809 P·7 C·189 Y·576 N·397 w:16.9

Direct (659), Veterans (121), Military Families (17), Taxpayers (4), Military (3), Foreign (2), Youth (2), Religious Communities (1)

Healthcare 461 P·2 C·152 Y·307 N·197 w:11.8

Direct (437), Research (15), Tribal (4), Community (3), Rural (1), Safety Net (1)

Military 428 C·23 Y·405 N·248 w:2.6

Direct (425), Air Force (2), Families (1)

Defense 395 C·18 Y·377 N·242 w:2.2

Direct (382), Naval (2), Testing (2), Ammunition (1), Ground Vehicles (1), Missiles (1), Missiles/Hypersonics (1), Nuclear C3 (1), Rotorcraft (1), Small Business (1), Small/Innovative (1), Space Systems (1)

Education 341 P·10 C·112 Y·208 N·154 w:13.1

Direct (330), Child Care (3), Maritime Training (2), Holocaust & Cultural Organizations (1), Immigrant Students (1), Religious Studies (1), Research Universities (1), Technical (1), Tribal (1)

Financial Services 262 P·2 C·58 Y·184 N·109 w:6.8

Direct (255), HSA (7)

Real Estate 252 P·1 C·209 Y·42 N·29 w:3.3

Direct (250), Rental (2)

Transportation 241 C·61 Y·177 N·57 w:4.3

Direct (239), Labor (2)

Cryptocurrency 209 Y·209 w:0.2

Negative-Effect Industries

Government 3192 P·41 C·1086 Y·1812 N·1161 w:79.5

Direct (2766), Defense (101), Veterans Affairs (69), Regulatory (43), EPA (30), Coast Guard (27), Executive Branch (11), NPS (11), Education (9), FDA (9), Agriculture (7), BLM (7), Forest Service (7), SEC (7), HHS (6), Foreign (5), State (5), CFPB (4), Federal Child Welfare (4), Treasury (4), Treasury/IRS (4), VA (4), Executive (3), Legislative (3), Legislative Branch (3), NOAA (3), NOAA/EPA (3), Natural Resources (3), Acquisition (2), Congress (2), Defense Acquisition (2), Foreign Diplomatic (2), Law Enforcement (2), Military (2), USTR (2), DOE (1), DOJ (1), DoD (1), Energy Department (1), Energy/Defense (1), Environmental Regulation (1), Federal (1), Federal Immigration (1), Federal Law Enforcement (1), Intelligence (1), Interior Department (1), Local (1), Museums & Cultural Institutions (1), NNSA (1), Science Agencies (1), Space Force (1), Strategic Command (1), U.S. Coast Guard (1), USDA (1), Waste Management (1)

Defense 266 C·31 Y·220 N·139 w:2.2

Direct (262), Nuclear (2), Logistics (1), Maintenance (1)

Military 257 C·13 Y·244 N·145 w:0.7

Direct (253), Intercontinental Ballistic Missile Systems (3), Space Force (1)

General Public 245 C·9 Y·189 N·195 w:1.9

Direct (218), Veterans (20), Family Sponsors (4), Environmental Health (1), Environmental Justice (1), Water Quality (1)

Taxpayers 232 P·2 C·145 Y·85 N·85 w:17.2

Healthcare 207 C·61 Y·128 N·121 w:4.1

Direct (203), Family Planning Services (2), Public Health (2)

Financial Services 205 P·2 C·88 Y·106 N·64 w:8.8

Law Enforcement 203 P·2 C·137 Y·26 N·38 w:5.0

Education 196 P·1 C·33 Y·90 N·157 w:4.4

Direct (195), K-12 (1)

Transportation 192 C·40 Y·148 N·44 w:3.1

Direct (184), Foreign (2), Technology (2), Tourism (2), Moving (1), Research Vessels (1)

Click any row to see supporting clauses

Showing positive and negative-direction effects only. Mixed and uncertain effects are not included in these counts.

Votes by Industry (Yea/Nay Alignment)

How this legislator's Yea/Nay votes landed across industries; distinct from overall bill exposure above.

Analysis coverage

100.0% of votes

Show vote-alignment table

S+ Supported Benefits

S- Supported Burdens

O+ Opposed Benefits

O- Opposed Burdens

Industry	S+	S-	O+	O-	Net
Government (75 sub) Sub-categories (total impacts, all buckets): Defense (229), Veterans Affairs (183), Coast Guard (36), DoD (33), EPA (31) +70 more					-467
General Public (8 sub) Sub-categories (total impacts, all buckets): Veterans (141), Military Families (17), Family Sponsors (4), Military (3), Foreign (2) +3 more					-42
Military (4 sub) Sub-categories (total impacts, all buckets): Intercontinental Ballistic Missile Systems (3), Air Force (2), Families (1), Space Force (1)					-45
Defense (14 sub) Sub-categories (total impacts, all buckets): Naval (2), Nuclear (2), Testing (2), Ammunition (1), Ground Vehicles (1) +9 more					-64
Healthcare (5 sub) Sub-categories (total impacts, all buckets): Research (15), Community (3), Tribal (3), Family Planning Services (2), Public Health (2)					+9
Education (6 sub) Sub-categories (total impacts, all buckets): Child Care (3), Maritime Training (2), Immigrant Students (1), Religious Studies (1), Research Universities (1) +1 more					+63
Cryptocurrency			-	-	+71
Transportation (6 sub) Sub-categories (total impacts, all buckets): Foreign (2), Labor (2), Technology (2), Tourism (2), Moving (1) +1 more					+2
Financial Services (1 sub) Sub-categories (total impacts, all buckets): HSA (7)					-3
State & Local Government (2 sub) Sub-categories (total impacts, all buckets): Medicaid (6), Non-Expansion (3)					+72
Construction (4 sub) Sub-categories (total impacts, all buckets): Federal Projects (1), Federal/Military (1), Military/Pacific (1), Utilities/Infrastructure (1)					-45
Manufacturing (4 sub) Sub-categories (total impacts, all buckets): Foreign (8), Electrical Equipment (2), Defense (1), Foreign Adversary (1)					+14
Taxpayers	-	-			-15
Agriculture (6 sub) Sub-categories (total impacts, all buckets): Coffee (2), Commodities (2), Hemp (2), Livestock (2), Coffee Production (1) +1 more					-119
Law Enforcement					-60

Votes are cast on entire bills; attribution to individual clauses does not imply clause-level intent. Learn more

Loading votes...