Government Operations
43 bills 422 analyzed clauses
Explore affected groups
R KS-2 · House
Policy Effects
Estimated effects on people, organizations, and industries in bills this legislator sponsored, cosponsored, or voted on. Includes bills they voted against.
These are assessments of legislative text, not measurements of realized outcomes or the legislator’s intent.
This selection could not be loaded. Your current view is still available.
Open the requested selection in a full pageStart with a policy area to see the specific groups affected.
43 bills 422 analyzed clauses
Explore affected groups36 bills 292 analyzed clauses
Explore affected groups29 bills 125 analyzed clauses
Explore affected groups20 bills 62 analyzed clauses
Explore affected groups18 bills 359 analyzed clauses
Explore affected groups17 bills 413 analyzed clauses
Explore affected groups14 bills 30 analyzed clauses
Explore affected groups12 bills 29 analyzed clauses
Explore affected groups10 bills 26 analyzed clauses
Explore affected groups9 bills 32 analyzed clauses
Explore affected groups8 bills 146 analyzed clauses
Explore affected groups8 bills 22 analyzed clauses
Explore affected groups8 bills 18 analyzed clauses
Explore affected groups8 bills 18 analyzed clauses
Explore affected groups6 bills 26 analyzed clauses
Explore affected groups5 bills 41 analyzed clauses
Explore affected groups5 bills 13 analyzed clauses
Explore affected groups4 bills 22 analyzed clauses
Explore affected groups4 bills 6 analyzed clauses
Explore affected groups3 bills 4 analyzed clauses
Explore affected groups2 bills 7 analyzed clauses
Explore affected groups2 bills 3 analyzed clauses
Explore affected groups2 bills 3 analyzed clauses
Explore affected groups2 bills 2 analyzed clauses
Explore affected groups1 bill 21 analyzed clauses
Explore affected groups1 bill 8 analyzed clauses
Explore affected groups1 bill 6 analyzed clauses
Explore affected groups1 bill 3 analyzed clauses
Explore affected groups1 bill 2 analyzed clauses
Explore affected groups1 bill 2 analyzed clauses
Explore affected groups1 bill 2 analyzed clauses
Explore affected groups1 bill 2 analyzed clauses
Explore affected groups1 bill 1 analyzed clause
Explore affected groups1 bill 1 analyzed clause
Explore affected groups1 bill 1 analyzed clause
Explore affected groups1 bill 1 analyzed clause
Explore affected groupsPotential benefits are effects assessed as favorable to the named group. Potential burdens impose costs, restrictions, risks, or lost opportunities on that group.
Mixed effects contain countervailing effects on the same group. Unclear effects have an undetermined direction. A group can have separate benefits and burdens; these are counted separately.
Counts describe the number of identified effects, not their size or public value. Bill and clause counts are distinct within each view. Shared evidence may appear under several groups or policy areas, so their counts should not be added together.
Historical bill versions are included. Clauses analyzed in different versions count separately. A bill’s current status does not establish that every analyzed provision was enacted.
Only direct effects with high or medium confidence in the policy-area assignment are included. Bills are connected through sponsorship, cosponsorship, or Yea/Nay votes; a vote against a bill does not reverse its assessed effects. Vote dates filter recorded votes and vote-linked bills; sponsorship remains included.
To require each agency to evaluate the permitting system of the agency, to consider whether a permit by rule could replace that system, and for other purposes.
Recognizing the importance of stepped-up basis under section 1014 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 in preserving family-owned farms and small businesses.
To restore the exemption of family farms and small businesses from the definition of assets under title IV of the Higher Education Act of 1965.
To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to make permanent certain provisions of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act affecting individuals, families, and small businesses, and for other purposes.
To prohibit taxpayer funded abortions.
Loading countries...
Select a clause to see detailed analysis
Failed to load analysis
Please try again
Failed to load clauses
Please try again
Explore affected groups in Policy Effects to view supporting evidence. Existing clause links also open here.
Select a clause to see detailed analysis