Back to Legislators

Robin L. Kelly

Analysis

D IL-2 · House

2025–Present House Of Representatives (District 2)

2023–2025 House Of Representatives (District 2)

2021–2023 House Of Representatives (District 2)

2019–2021 House Of Representatives (District 2)

2017–2019 House Of Representatives (District 2)

2015–2017 House Of Representatives (District 2)

2013–2015 House Of Representatives (District 2)

Defense

+150

Helped 1304 Hurt 1154 Unclear 772

Healthcare

+423

Helped 1251 Hurt 828 Mixed 39 Unclear 763

Finance

+36

Helped 953 Hurt 917 Mixed 5 Unclear 360

Education

+238

Helped 673 Hurt 435 Unclear 266

Energy

-64

Helped 332 Hurt 396 Mixed 3 Unclear 247

Criminal Justice

-146

Helped 339 Hurt 485 Mixed 4 Unclear 103

Labor

+129

Helped 328 Hurt 199 Unclear 224

Agriculture

+115

Helped 356 Hurt 241 Unclear 127

Veterans Affairs

+287

Helped 443 Hurt 156 Unclear 108

Trade

-60

Helped 266 Hurt 326 Mixed 4 Unclear 69

Transportation

-41

Helped 193 Hurt 234 Unclear 146

Government Operations

-35

Helped 46 Hurt 81 Unclear 414

Immigration

-127

Helped 165 Hurt 292 Mixed 4 Unclear 76

Technology

+18

Helped 234 Hurt 216 Unclear 72

Housing

+33

Helped 246 Hurt 213 Unclear 41

Environment

-55

Helped 141 Hurt 196 Unclear 148

Social Welfare

+284

Helped 316 Hurt 32 Unclear 24

Military Procurement

+17

Helped 142 Hurt 125 Unclear 101

Civil Rights

+59

Helped 185 Hurt 126 Unclear 50

Elections

-5

Helped 154 Hurt 159 Mixed 2

20 policy domains

Helped Hurt Mixed Unclear

Industry Impact Profile

24947 industry impacts

All entities →

How this is computed

P Primary sponsor · C Co-sponsor · Y Yea vote · N Nay vote

Weighted score (w:) uses strongest role per bill. Weights: Primary 1.0, Co-sponsor 0.3, Yea 0.1, Nay -0.1.

Bills where the legislator voted nay (without sponsorship) contribute -0.1 per bill. Equal yea and nay roll calls on the same bill contribute 0.

Vote date filters affect vote attribution; sponsorship is always included.

Positive-Effect Industries

Government 2515 P·1 C·264 Y·2205 N·1787 w:20.7

Direct (1991), Defense (128), Veterans Affairs (114), DoD (32), Legislative Branch (19), State (19), VA (19), Executive (16), USDA (16), Congress (15), Legislative (14), Treasury (13), Agriculture (11), Coast Guard (9), NPS (7), CMS (6), Judiciary (6), Justice (6), Oversight (6), DOJ (4), Education (4), Foreign Affairs (4), ICE (4), Research (4), Local (3), Medicare (3), Transportation (3), Army Corps (2), Cemeteries (2), DHS (2), FDA (2), FEMA (2), Housing (2), Interior/USDA (2), International Development (2), Military Logistics (2), NASA (2), NOAA (2), SBA (2), SSA (2), Defense R&D (1), EPA (1), Federal Executive (1), Federal Law Enforcement (1), HHS (1), IBWC (1), Intelligence (1), Judicial (1), Law Enforcement (1), Manufacturing (1), Municipal (1), National Security (1), State Government (1)

General Public 1082 P·48 C·421 Y·506 N·477 w:21.6

Direct (807), Veterans (124), Underserved Communities (76), Families (26), Seniors (19), Military Families (17), Rural (4), Consumers (3), Military (3), Foreign (2), Black Maternal Health Beneficiaries (1)

Healthcare 674 P·17 C·350 Y·307 N·205 w:13.4

Direct (650), Research (15), Community (3), Tribal (3), Patients (1), Perinatal Care (1), Reproductive Health (1)

Education 609 P·4 C·386 Y·204 N·177 w:16.3

Direct (598), Child Care (3), Maritime Training (2), Developing Countries (1), Immigrant Students (1), Professional Development (1), Religious Studies (1), Research Universities (1), Technical (1)

Military 419 C·14 Y·405 N·363 w:1.9

Direct (416), Air Force (2), Families (1)

Defense 379 C·2 Y·377 N·343 w:0.3

Direct (366), Naval (2), Testing (2), Ammunition (1), Ground Vehicles (1), Missiles (1), Missiles/Hypersonics (1), Nuclear C3 (1), Rotorcraft (1), Small Business (1), Small/Innovative (1), Space Systems (1)

Social Services 280 C·231 Y·49 N·20 w:3.0

State & Local Government 263 P·2 C·122 Y·137 N·80 w:8.3

Direct (257), Medicaid (6)

Labor 261 P·9 C·207 Y·41 N·28 w:9.8

Direct (260), Maritime (1)

Real Estate 259 C·217 Y·42 N·33 w:2.2

Negative-Effect Industries

Government 4103 P·84 C·1952 Y·1658 N·1502 w:96.5

Direct (3685), Defense (101), Veterans Affairs (69), Regulatory (43), EPA (30), Coast Guard (27), NPS (11), Education (9), FDA (9), Executive Branch (8), Agriculture (7), BLM (7), Forest Service (7), SEC (7), HHS (6), Foreign (5), Law Enforcement (5), CFPB (4), Federal Child Welfare (4), Treasury/IRS (4), VA (4), Executive (3), Legislative (3), Legislative Branch (3), NOAA (3), NOAA/EPA (3), Natural Resources (3), Acquisition (2), Congress (2), DOJ (2), Defense Acquisition (2), Foreign Diplomatic (2), Health (2), Military (2), DOE (1), DoD (1), Energy Department (1), Energy/Defense (1), Environmental Regulation (1), Federal (1), Federal Immigration (1), Federal Law Enforcement (1), Intelligence (1), Interior Department (1), NNSA (1), Science Agencies (1), Space Force (1), State (1), Strategic Command (1), Treasury (1), U.S. Coast Guard (1), USDA (1), Waste Management (1)

Taxpayers 418 P·20 C·313 Y·85 N·85 w:25.1

Financial Services 295 P·2 C·178 Y·85 N·86 w:11.3

Healthcare 294 P·8 C·140 Y·128 N·126 w:7.9

Direct (290), Family Planning Services (2), Public Health (2)

State & Local Government 277 C·176 Y·84 N·88 w:10.1

Direct (274), Non-Expansion (3)

General Public 265 C·28 Y·189 N·205 w:2.7

Direct (238), Veterans (20), Family Sponsors (4), Environmental Health (1), Environmental Justice (1), Water Quality (1)

Defense 253 C·18 Y·220 N·227 w:1.8

Direct (249), Nuclear (2), Logistics (1), Maintenance (1)

Military 244 Y·244 N·224 w:-0.3

Direct (240), Intercontinental Ballistic Missile Systems (3), Space Force (1)

Education 241 P·4 C·75 Y·89 N·161 w:9.7

Law Enforcement 224 P·7 C·153 Y·18 N·57 w:11.0

Click any row to see supporting clauses

Showing positive and negative-direction effects only. Mixed and uncertain effects are not included in these counts.

Votes by Industry (Yea/Nay Alignment)

How this legislator's Yea/Nay votes landed across industries; distinct from overall bill exposure above.

Analysis coverage

100.0% of votes

Show vote-alignment table

S+ Supported Benefits

S- Supported Burdens

O+ Opposed Benefits

O- Opposed Burdens

Industry	S+	S-	Net
Government (75 sub) Sub-categories (total impacts, all buckets): Defense (229), Veterans Affairs (183), Coast Guard (36), DoD (33), EPA (31) +70 more			-411
General Public (8 sub) Sub-categories (total impacts, all buckets): Veterans (141), Military Families (17), Family Sponsors (4), Military (3), Foreign (2) +3 more			-182
Military (4 sub) Sub-categories (total impacts, all buckets): Intercontinental Ballistic Missile Systems (3), Air Force (2), Families (1), Space Force (1)			-117
Defense (14 sub) Sub-categories (total impacts, all buckets): Naval (2), Nuclear (2), Testing (2), Ammunition (1), Ground Vehicles (1) +9 more			-90
Healthcare (5 sub) Sub-categories (total impacts, all buckets): Research (15), Community (3), Tribal (3), Family Planning Services (2), Public Health (2)			+3
Education (6 sub) Sub-categories (total impacts, all buckets): Child Care (3), Maritime Training (2), Immigrant Students (1), Religious Studies (1), Research Universities (1) +1 more			+25
Cryptocurrency			-59
Transportation (6 sub) Sub-categories (total impacts, all buckets): Foreign (2), Labor (2), Technology (2), Tourism (2), Moving (1) +1 more			+12
Financial Services (1 sub) Sub-categories (total impacts, all buckets): HSA (7)			-97
State & Local Government (2 sub) Sub-categories (total impacts, all buckets): Medicaid (6), Non-Expansion (3)			+54
Construction (4 sub) Sub-categories (total impacts, all buckets): Federal Projects (1), Federal/Military (1), Military/Pacific (1), Utilities/Infrastructure (1)		-	-93
Manufacturing (4 sub) Sub-categories (total impacts, all buckets): Foreign (8), Electrical Equipment (2), Defense (1), Foreign Adversary (1)			+2
Taxpayers	-	-	-15
Agriculture (6 sub) Sub-categories (total impacts, all buckets): Coffee (2), Commodities (2), Hemp (2), Livestock (2), Coffee Production (1) +1 more			-127
Law Enforcement			-26

Votes are cast on entire bills; attribution to individual clauses does not imply clause-level intent. Learn more

Loading votes...