Back to Legislators

Adelita S. Grijalva

Analysis

D AZ-7 · House

2025–Present House Of Representatives (District 7)

Healthcare

+106

Helped 475 Hurt 369 Mixed 39 Unclear 453

Education

+346

Helped 611 Hurt 265 Unclear 128

Defense

-43

Helped 325 Hurt 368 Unclear 267

Finance

-103

Helped 298 Hurt 401 Unclear 124

Energy

-240

Helped 200 Hurt 440 Mixed 3 Unclear 134

Labor

+187

Helped 280 Hurt 93 Unclear 198

Agriculture

+37

Helped 174 Hurt 137 Unclear 65

Housing

-68

Helped 118 Hurt 186 Unclear 7

Government Operations

Helped 6 Hurt 1 Unclear 296

Federal Budget

+162

Helped 207 Hurt 45 Unclear 36

Higher Education

-171

Helped 28 Hurt 199

Environment

+47

Helped 103 Hurt 56 Unclear 63

Immigration

+82

Helped 140 Hurt 58 Unclear 23

Criminal Justice

-16

Helped 82 Hurt 98 Unclear 13

Veterans Affairs

+68

Helped 91 Hurt 23 Unclear 51

Technology

-24

Helped 64 Hurt 88 Unclear 10

Civil Rights

+52

Helped 85 Hurt 33 Unclear 38

Intelligence

-18

Helped 40 Hurt 58 Unclear 24

Foreign Affairs

-10

Helped 45 Hurt 55 Unclear 21

Trade

Helped 54 Hurt 46 Unclear 21

20 policy domains

Helped Hurt Mixed Unclear

Industry Impact Profile

10263 industry impacts

All entities →

How this is computed

P Primary sponsor · C Co-sponsor · Y Yea vote · N Nay vote

Weighted score (w:) uses strongest role per bill. Weights: Primary 1.0, Co-sponsor 0.3, Yea 0.1, Nay -0.1.

Bills where the legislator voted nay (without sponsorship) contribute -0.1 per bill. Equal yea and nay roll calls on the same bill contribute 0.

Vote date filters affect vote attribution; sponsorship is always included.

Positive-Effect Industries

Government 862 P·1 C·106 Y·327 N·736 w:9.8

Direct (656), DoD (32), VA (19), State (17), Executive (16), USDA (16), Veterans Affairs (16), Legislative (14), Agriculture (11), Congress (9), Legislative Branch (6), Defense (5), DOJ (4), Judiciary (4), Local (3), Army Corps (2), DHS (2), FDA (2), FEMA (2), Housing (2), Interior/USDA (2), International Development (2), Military Logistics (2), NASA (2), SBA (2), SSA (2), Treasury (2), Defense R&D (1), EPA (1), Federal Executive (1), Federal Law Enforcement (1), HHS (1), IBWC (1), Intelligence (1), Judicial (1), Manufacturing (1), Municipal (1)

Education 540 P·22 C·491 Y·22 N·26 w:12.4

Direct (538), Religious Studies (1), Technical (1)

General Public 347 P·2 C·193 Y·27 N·141 w:14.5

Direct (315), Veterans (28), Foreign (2), Military Families (2)

Healthcare 289 C·231 Y·8 N·58 w:6.2

Labor 253 C·248 Y·2 N·5 w:9.1

Direct (252), Maritime (1)

Military 146 C·24 Y·115 N·122 w:2.0

Direct (145), Families (1)

Real Estate 144 C·129 Y·9 N·15 w:1.4

Defense 124 C·2 Y·104 N·119 w:0.6

Direct (111), Naval (2), Testing (2), Ammunition (1), Ground Vehicles (1), Missiles (1), Missiles/Hypersonics (1), Nuclear C3 (1), Rotorcraft (1), Small Business (1), Small/Innovative (1), Space Systems (1)

State & Local Government 94 P·1 C·60 Y·28 N·13 w:5.4

Agriculture 89 C·19 Y·12 N·70 w:1.7

Direct (81), Coffee (2), Commodities (2), Hemp (2), Livestock (2)

Negative-Effect Industries

Government 1688 P·7 C·1178 Y·260 N·461 w:50.3

Direct (1583), Veterans Affairs (14), Defense (12), FDA (9), EPA (8), Agriculture (7), Federal Child Welfare (4), SEC (4), VA (4), Executive (3), Natural Resources (3), Acquisition (2), Congress (2), Defense Acquisition (2), Foreign (2), Foreign Diplomatic (2), HHS (2), Health (2), Law Enforcement (2), Military (2), Coast Guard (1), DOE (1), DoD (1), Energy Department (1), Energy/Defense (1), Environmental Regulation (1), Federal (1), Federal Immigration (1), Federal Law Enforcement (1), Intelligence (1), Interior Department (1), NNSA (1), Space Force (1), State (1), Strategic Command (1), Treasury (1), U.S. Coast Guard (1), USDA (1), Waste Management (1)

Taxpayers 274 P·2 C·272 w:18.1

Education 156 P·7 C·95 Y·3 N·54 w:5.7

Oil & Gas 135 C·134 Y·1 N·1 w:2.4

Healthcare 125 C·84 Y·5 N·41 w:3.1

Direct (123), Public Health (2)

Financial Services 123 C·115 Y·4 N·8 w:4.4

Real Estate 117 C·104 Y·7 N·13 w:1.1

Direct (114), Foreign (2), Military Housing (1)

Small Business 103 C·100 N·3 w:4.1

State & Local Government 99 P·5 C·82 Y·2 N·10 w:8.0

Defense 98 C·10 Y·88 N·88 w:1.2

Direct (94), Nuclear (2), Logistics (1), Maintenance (1)

Click any row to see supporting clauses

Showing positive and negative-direction effects only. Mixed and uncertain effects are not included in these counts.

Votes by Industry (Yea/Nay Alignment)

How this legislator's Yea/Nay votes landed across industries; distinct from overall bill exposure above.

Analysis coverage

100.0% of votes

Show vote-alignment table

S+ Supported Benefits

S- Supported Burdens

O+ Opposed Benefits

O- Opposed Burdens

Industry	S+	S-	Net
Government (58 sub) Sub-categories (total impacts, all buckets): DoD (33), Veterans Affairs (30), VA (23), Executive (19), Agriculture (18) +53 more			-306
Defense (14 sub) Sub-categories (total impacts, all buckets): Naval (2), Nuclear (2), Testing (2), Ammunition (1), Ground Vehicles (1) +9 more		-	-28
Military (2 sub) Sub-categories (total impacts, all buckets): Families (1), Space Force (1)	-	-	-42
General Public (7 sub) Sub-categories (total impacts, all buckets): Veterans (28), Family Sponsors (4), Foreign (2), Military Families (2), Environmental Health (1) +2 more			-110
Healthcare (1 sub) Sub-categories (total impacts, all buckets): Public Health (2)	-	-	-17
Education (2 sub) Sub-categories (total impacts, all buckets): Religious Studies (1), Technical (1)		-	+29
Construction (3 sub) Sub-categories (total impacts, all buckets): Federal/Military (1), Military/Pacific (1), Utilities/Infrastructure (1)		-	-29
Agriculture (5 sub) Sub-categories (total impacts, all buckets): Coffee (2), Commodities (2), Hemp (2), Livestock (2), Coffee Production (1)			-51
Transportation	-		+4
Utilities			-16
Financial Services	-	-	-32
Veterans	-	-	-40
Law Enforcement	-		-3
State & Local Government			+15
Manufacturing (3 sub) Sub-categories (total impacts, all buckets): Foreign (4), Defense (1), Foreign Adversary (1)		-	-2

Votes are cast on entire bills; attribution to individual clauses does not imply clause-level intent. Learn more

Loading votes...