HR7033-119

In Committee

Federal Correctional Officer Paycheck Protection Act of 2026

119th Congress Introduced Jan 13, 2026

Summary

What This Bill Does

The Federal Correctional Officer Paycheck Protection Act of 2026 creates special base rates for federal correctional officers employed by the Bureau of Prisons. Covered officers include correctional officers whose duties primarily involve custody, control, or supervision of inmates, routine direct inmate contact in custodial settings, certain supervisors or administrators whose positions would qualify if they included routine custodial contact, and positions OPM determines would satisfy the standard under BOP classification. The special rate replaces the otherwise applicable General Schedule base rate or LEO special base rate, counts as basic pay for locality, severance, premium pay, and federal retirement purposes, and is computed by increasing the applicable base rate by 35 percent, rounded to the nearest dollar, capped at Executive Schedule level V. The authority terminates after five years unless the DOJ Inspector General reports measurable progress in reducing or eliminating augmentation, reducing excessive mandatory overtime, and improving recruitment, retention, and institutional safety. If the IG finds measurable progress, the special pay authority continues.

Who Benefits and How

Federal correctional officers benefit from a 35 percent special base-rate increase that also counts toward important pay and retirement calculations. Bureau of Prisons institutions benefit if higher pay improves recruitment, retention, safety, and reduces mandatory overtime and reliance on non-custodial staff for correctional duties. Inmates, prison staff, and communities near federal prisons may benefit if staffing becomes more stable. Congress and DOJ benefit from an Inspector General review before the temporary authority expires.

Who Bears the Burden and How

Bureau of Prisons payroll staff, OPM classification staff, DOJ personnel offices, and federal retirement administrators must identify covered officers, calculate special rates, apply caps, update payroll systems, and integrate the rate into locality, severance, overtime, premium pay, and retirement. Federal taxpayers bear higher personnel costs. DOJ Inspector General staff must evaluate augmentation, mandatory overtime, recruitment, retention, and institutional safety before the five-year sunset.

Key Provisions

  • Creates a special base rate for Bureau of Prisons federal correctional officers.
  • Defines covered officers to include custody, control, supervision, direct inmate contact, and qualifying supervisory or administrative positions.
  • Requires the special base rate to replace the applicable General Schedule or LEO special base rate.
  • Requires the special rate to count as basic pay for locality, severance, premium pay, and retirement purposes.
  • Increases applicable base rates by 35 percent subject to an Executive Schedule level V cap.
  • Provides a five-year sunset unless the DOJ Inspector General finds measurable progress on augmentation, overtime, recruitment, retention, and safety.

Evidence Chain:

This summary is generated from the full bill text using AI analysis. Expand "Detailed Analysis" below for identified beneficiaries/burden bearers with clause-level evidence links.

At a Glance

What This Bill Does

Creates a five-year special base pay system for Bureau of Prisons federal correctional officers, raising applicable General Schedule or law-enforcement special base rates by 35 percent up to Executive Schedule level V, treating the special rate as basic pay for locality, severance, premium pay, retirement, and related purposes, and requiring a DOJ Inspector General review before expiration.

Key Policy Areas

Law Enforcement, Labor, Government

Primary Purpose

Creates a five-year special base pay system for Bureau of Prisons federal correctional officers, raising applicable General Schedule or law-enforcement special base rates by 35 percent up to Executive Schedule level V, treating the special rate as basic pay for locality, severance, premium pay, retirement, and related purposes, and requiring a DOJ Inspector General review before expiration.

Policy Domains

Law Enforcement Labor Government

Substantive provisions

Identified Gains
  • Federal correctional officers
  • Bureau of Prisons institutions
  • Inmates in federal prisons
  • Prison staff
  • Communities near federal prisons
  • DOJ Inspector General reviewers
Model: codex-gpt-5 | Version: bill_summary_v2 | Source: ih
Prison staff: , ,
Inmates in federal prisons: , ,
Federal correctional officers: , ,
Bureau of Prisons institutions: , ,
DOJ Inspector General reviewers: , ,
Communities near federal prisons: , ,
Identified Costs
  • Bureau of Prisons payroll staff
  • OPM classification staff
  • DOJ personnel offices
  • Federal retirement administrators
  • Federal taxpayers
  • DOJ Inspector General staff
Model: codex-gpt-5 | Version: bill_summary_v2 | Source: ih
Federal taxpayers: , ,
DOJ personnel offices: , ,
OPM classification staff: , ,
DOJ Inspector General staff: , ,
Bureau of Prisons payroll staff: , ,
Federal retirement administrators: , ,

Legislative Progress

In Committee
Introduced Committee Passed
Jan 13, 2026

Mr. Goldman of New York (for himself, Ms. Goodlander, Mr. …

Jan 13, 2026

Referred to the House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform.

Jan 13, 2026

Introduced in House

Stakeholder Effects

cui bono?

How this legislation distributes effects. Mention counts reflect frequency, not effect magnitude.

Law Enforcement
4 mentions across 2 clauses
+4 positive

Bureau of Prisons institutions, Bureau of Prisons supervisors, Federal correctional officers

Government
4 mentions across 2 clauses
-4 negative

Bureau of Prisons payroll staff, Federal retirement administrators, OPM classification staff

Taxpayers
1 mention across 1 clause
-1 negative

Taxpayers

3/4
sections analyzed
Full impact breakdown

Bill Structure & Actor Mappings

Who is "The Secretary" in each section?

Domains
Law Enforcement Labor Government

We use a combination of our own taxonomy and classification in addition to large language models to assess meaning and potential beneficiaries. High confidence means strong textual evidence. Always verify with the original bill text.

Learn more about our methodology