Back to Legislators

Rudy Yakym III

Analysis

R IN-2 · House

2025–Present House Of Representatives (District 2)

2023–2025 House Of Representatives (District 2)

2022–2023 House Of Representatives (District 2)

Defense

+153

Helped 1293 Hurt 1140 Unclear 1141

Finance

+386

Helped 1046 Hurt 660 Mixed 4 Unclear 378

Healthcare

+285

Helped 667 Hurt 382 Unclear 462

Energy

-50

Helped 326 Hurt 376 Mixed 3 Unclear 221

Education

+33

Helped 328 Hurt 295 Unclear 294

Veterans Affairs

+276

Helped 444 Hurt 168 Unclear 91

Agriculture

+153

Helped 327 Hurt 174 Unclear 146

Criminal Justice

-18

Helped 284 Hurt 302 Mixed 4 Unclear 57

Government Operations

Helped 56 Hurt 55 Unclear 507

Transportation

-26

Helped 223 Hurt 249 Unclear 129

Environment

-88

Helped 61 Hurt 149 Unclear 292

Trade

+125

Helped 279 Hurt 154 Mixed 2 Unclear 48

Housing

+69

Helped 210 Hurt 141 Unclear 33

Social Welfare

+93

Helped 198 Hurt 105 Unclear 81

Immigration

-201

Helped 58 Hurt 259 Mixed 4 Unclear 59

Military Procurement

+17

Helped 142 Hurt 125 Unclear 101

Technology

+73

Helped 200 Hurt 127 Unclear 39

Foreign Affairs

-226

Helped 48 Hurt 274 Unclear 30

Tax

-94

Helped 108 Hurt 202

Labor

-12

Helped 103 Hurt 115 Unclear 82

20 policy domains

Helped Hurt Mixed Unclear

Industry Impact Profile

19431 industry impacts

All entities →

How this is computed

P Primary sponsor · C Co-sponsor · Y Yea vote · N Nay vote

Weighted score (w:) uses strongest role per bill. Weights: Primary 1.0, Co-sponsor 0.3, Yea 0.1, Nay -0.1.

Bills where the legislator voted nay (without sponsorship) contribute -0.1 per bill. Equal yea and nay roll calls on the same bill contribute 0.

Vote date filters affect vote attribution; sponsorship is always included.

Positive-Effect Industries

Government 2388 P·22 C·119 Y·2248 N·1776 w:16.3

Direct (1862), Defense (128), Veterans Affairs (114), DoD (32), Legislative Branch (19), State (19), VA (19), Executive (16), USDA (16), Legislative (14), Treasury (13), Congress (12), Agriculture (11), Justice (10), Coast Guard (9), NPS (7), CMS (6), Oversight (6), DOJ (4), Education (4), Foreign Affairs (4), ICE (4), Judiciary (4), Research (4), Local (3), Medicare (3), Transportation (3), Army Corps (2), Cemeteries (2), DHS (2), FDA (2), FEMA (2), Federal Executive Departments (2), Housing (2), Interior/USDA (2), International Development (2), Military Logistics (2), NASA (2), NOAA (2), SBA (2), SSA (2), Defense R&D (1), Department Of Defense (1), EPA (1), Federal Executive (1), Federal Law Enforcement (1), Federal Legislative (1), Foreign (1), HHS (1), IBWC (1), Intelligence (1), Judicial (1), Manufacturing (1), Municipal (1), National Security (1)

General Public 684 C·74 Y·613 N·396 w:7.6

Direct (541), Veterans (121), Military Families (17), Military (3), Foreign (2)

Military 413 C·8 Y·405 N·363 w:1.6

Direct (410), Air Force (2), Families (1)

Defense 401 P·2 C·22 Y·377 N·343 w:3.4

Direct (388), Naval (2), Testing (2), Ammunition (1), Ground Vehicles (1), Missiles (1), Missiles/Hypersonics (1), Nuclear C3 (1), Rotorcraft (1), Small Business (1), Small/Innovative (1), Space Systems (1)

Healthcare 389 P·5 C·77 Y·307 N·285 w:9.6

Direct (367), Research (15), Community (3), Tribal (3), Preventive Medicine (1)

Financial Services 305 C·118 Y·202 N·93 w:6.8

Direct (298), HSA (7)

Education 276 C·57 Y·219 N·174 w:5.5

Direct (267), Child Care (3), Maritime Training (2), Immigrant Students (1), Religious Studies (1), Research Universities (1), Technical (1)

Transportation 237 P·4 C·56 Y·180 N·83 w:6.2

Direct (235), Labor (2)

Cryptocurrency 217 C·8 Y·209 w:0.5

Construction 212 P·1 C·26 Y·186 N·170 w:4.5

Direct (209), Federal/Military (1), Military/Pacific (1), Utilities/Infrastructure (1)

Negative-Effect Industries

Government 2938 P·31 C·878 Y·2063 N·1114 w:54.8

Direct (2525), Defense (101), Veterans Affairs (69), Regulatory (43), EPA (30), Coast Guard (27), NPS (11), FDA (9), Education (8), Agriculture (7), BLM (7), Foreign (7), Forest Service (7), SEC (7), HHS (6), CFPB (4), Federal Child Welfare (4), Treasury/IRS (4), VA (4), Executive (3), Federal Regulatory Agencies (3), Legislative (3), Legislative Branch (3), NOAA (3), NOAA/EPA (3), Natural Resources (3), Acquisition (2), Congress (2), Defense Acquisition (2), Foreign Diplomatic (2), Law Enforcement (2), Military (2), Banking Regulation (1), DOE (1), DOJ (1), Department Of Defense (1), DoD (1), Energy Department (1), Energy/Defense (1), Environmental Regulation (1), Federal (1), Federal Executive Departments (1), Federal Immigration (1), Federal Law Enforcement (1), Intelligence (1), Interior Department (1), Legislative Support (1), NNSA (1), Science Agencies (1), Space Force (1), State (1), State And Local (1), Strategic Command (1), Treasury (1), U.S. Coast Guard (1), USDA (1), Waste Management (1)

General Public 267 C·31 Y·237 N·157 w:5.0

Direct (240), Veterans (20), Family Sponsors (4), Environmental Health (1), Environmental Justice (1), Water Quality (1)

Financial Services 250 C·141 Y·115 N·56 w:6.8

Direct (247), China (3)

Defense 248 C·13 Y·235 N·212 w:1.8

Direct (243), Nuclear (2), Iran (1), Logistics (1), Maintenance (1)

Military 244 Y·244 N·224 w:0.3

Direct (240), Intercontinental Ballistic Missile Systems (3), Space Force (1)

Taxpayers 223 C·138 Y·85 N·85 w:10.6

Healthcare 208 P·5 C·57 Y·146 N·117 w:4.7

Direct (203), Family Planning Services (2), Public Health (2), Reproductive Health (1)

Transportation 189 P·1 C·40 Y·152 N·70 w:4.7

Direct (181), Foreign (2), Technology (2), Tourism (2), Moving (1), Research Vessels (1)

Education 186 C·30 Y·162 N·88 w:2.7

Immigration 149 C·6 Y·143 N·134 w:1.1

Direct (142), Unaccompanied Minors (4), Undocumented (3)

Click any row to see supporting clauses

Showing positive and negative-direction effects only. Mixed and uncertain effects are not included in these counts.

Votes by Industry (Yea/Nay Alignment)

How this legislator's Yea/Nay votes landed across industries; distinct from overall bill exposure above.

Analysis coverage

100.0% of votes

Show vote-alignment table

S+ Supported Benefits

S- Supported Burdens

O+ Opposed Benefits

O- Opposed Burdens

Industry	O+	O-	Net
Government (75 sub) Sub-categories (total impacts, all buckets): Defense (229), Veterans Affairs (183), Coast Guard (36), DoD (33), EPA (31) +70 more			+281
General Public (8 sub) Sub-categories (total impacts, all buckets): Veterans (141), Military Families (17), Family Sponsors (4), Military (3), Foreign (2) +3 more			+376
Military (4 sub) Sub-categories (total impacts, all buckets): Intercontinental Ballistic Missile Systems (3), Air Force (2), Families (1), Space Force (1)	-		+167
Defense (14 sub) Sub-categories (total impacts, all buckets): Naval (2), Nuclear (2), Testing (2), Ammunition (1), Ground Vehicles (1) +9 more			+124
Healthcare (5 sub) Sub-categories (total impacts, all buckets): Research (15), Community (3), Tribal (3), Family Planning Services (2), Public Health (2)		-	+157
Education (6 sub) Sub-categories (total impacts, all buckets): Child Care (3), Maritime Training (2), Immigrant Students (1), Religious Studies (1), Research Universities (1) +1 more		-	+53
Cryptocurrency	-	-	+71
Transportation (6 sub) Sub-categories (total impacts, all buckets): Foreign (2), Labor (2), Technology (2), Tourism (2), Moving (1) +1 more		-	+20
Financial Services (1 sub) Sub-categories (total impacts, all buckets): HSA (7)			+41
State & Local Government (2 sub) Sub-categories (total impacts, all buckets): Medicaid (6), Non-Expansion (3)	-	-	+38
Construction (4 sub) Sub-categories (total impacts, all buckets): Federal Projects (1), Federal/Military (1), Military/Pacific (1), Utilities/Infrastructure (1)		-	+123
Manufacturing (4 sub) Sub-categories (total impacts, all buckets): Foreign (8), Electrical Equipment (2), Defense (1), Foreign Adversary (1)			+18
Taxpayers	-	-	+15
Agriculture (6 sub) Sub-categories (total impacts, all buckets): Coffee (2), Commodities (2), Hemp (2), Livestock (2), Coffee Production (1) +1 more			+139
Law Enforcement	-	-	+42

Votes are cast on entire bills; attribution to individual clauses does not imply clause-level intent. Learn more

Loading votes...