Healthcare
47 bills 257 analyzed clauses
Explore affected groups
D VA-10 · House
Policy Effects
Estimated effects on people, organizations, and industries in bills this legislator sponsored, cosponsored, or voted on. Includes bills they voted against.
These are assessments of legislative text, not measurements of realized outcomes or the legislator’s intent.
This selection could not be loaded. Your current view is still available.
Open the requested selection in a full pageStart with a policy area to see the specific groups affected.
47 bills 257 analyzed clauses
Explore affected groups43 bills 208 analyzed clauses
Explore affected groups31 bills 102 analyzed clauses
Explore affected groups27 bills 102 analyzed clauses
Explore affected groups26 bills 71 analyzed clauses
Explore affected groups17 bills 42 analyzed clauses
Explore affected groups15 bills 59 analyzed clauses
Explore affected groups15 bills 28 analyzed clauses
Explore affected groups13 bills 26 analyzed clauses
Explore affected groups13 bills 23 analyzed clauses
Explore affected groups11 bills 72 analyzed clauses
Explore affected groups10 bills 39 analyzed clauses
Explore affected groups9 bills 17 analyzed clauses
Explore affected groups7 bills 11 analyzed clauses
Explore affected groups6 bills 25 analyzed clauses
Explore affected groups5 bills 11 analyzed clauses
Explore affected groups5 bills 8 analyzed clauses
Explore affected groups5 bills 6 analyzed clauses
Explore affected groups4 bills 29 analyzed clauses
Explore affected groups4 bills 6 analyzed clauses
Explore affected groups4 bills 5 analyzed clauses
Explore affected groups3 bills 13 analyzed clauses
Explore affected groups2 bills 18 analyzed clauses
Explore affected groups1 bill 6 analyzed clauses
Explore affected groups1 bill 5 analyzed clauses
Explore affected groups1 bill 4 analyzed clauses
Explore affected groups1 bill 3 analyzed clauses
Explore affected groups1 bill 2 analyzed clauses
Explore affected groups1 bill 2 analyzed clauses
Explore affected groups1 bill 1 analyzed clause
Explore affected groups1 bill 1 analyzed clause
Explore affected groups1 bill 1 analyzed clause
Explore affected groups1 bill 1 analyzed clause
Explore affected groups1 bill 1 analyzed clause
Explore affected groupsPotential benefits are effects assessed as favorable to the named group. Potential burdens impose costs, restrictions, risks, or lost opportunities on that group.
Mixed effects contain countervailing effects on the same group. Unclear effects have an undetermined direction. A group can have separate benefits and burdens; these are counted separately.
Counts describe the number of identified effects, not their size or public value. Bill and clause counts are distinct within each view. Shared evidence may appear under several groups or policy areas, so their counts should not be added together.
Historical bill versions are included. Clauses analyzed in different versions count separately. A bill’s current status does not establish that every analyzed provision was enacted.
Only direct effects with high or medium confidence in the policy-area assignment are included. Bills are connected through sponsorship, cosponsorship, or Yea/Nay votes; a vote against a bill does not reverse its assessed effects. Vote dates filter recorded votes and vote-linked bills; sponsorship remains included.
To hold law enforcement accountable for misconduct in court, improve transparency through data collection, and reform police training and policies.
To improve rights to relief for individuals affected by non-consensual activities involving intimate digital forgeries, and for other purposes.
To protect our democracy by preventing abuses of Presidential power, restoring checks and balances and accountability and transparency in government, and defending elections against foreign interference, and for other purposes.
To end preventable maternal mortality, severe maternal morbidity, and maternal health disparities in the United States, and for other purposes.
To authorize notaries public to perform, and to establish minimum standards for, electronic notarizations and remote notarizations that occur in or affect interstate commerce, to require any Federal court to recognize notarizations performed by a notarial officer of any State, to require any State to recognize notarizations performed by a notarial officer of any other State when the notarization was performed under or relates to a public Act, record, or judicial proceeding of the notarial officer’s State or when the notarization occurs in or affects interstate commerce, and for other purposes.
Loading countries...
Select a clause to see detailed analysis
Failed to load analysis
Please try again
Failed to load clauses
Please try again
Explore affected groups in Policy Effects to view supporting evidence. Existing clause links also open here.
Select a clause to see detailed analysis