Back to Legislators

Mike Kelly

Analysis

R PA-16 · House

2025–Present House Of Representatives (District 16)

2023–2025 House Of Representatives (District 16)

2021–2023 House Of Representatives (District 16)

2019–2021 House Of Representatives (District 16)

2017–2019 House Of Representatives (District 3)

2015–2017 House Of Representatives (District 3)

2013–2015 House Of Representatives (District 3)

2011–2013 House Of Representatives (District 3)

Defense

+156

Helped 1274 Hurt 1118 Unclear 1130

Finance

+338

Helped 947 Hurt 609 Mixed 4 Unclear 373

Healthcare

+337

Helped 764 Hurt 427 Unclear 608

Education

+44

Helped 385 Hurt 341 Unclear 310

Energy

-44

Helped 314 Hurt 358 Mixed 3 Unclear 227

Immigration

-283

Helped 150 Hurt 433 Mixed 4 Unclear 238

Veterans Affairs

+257

Helped 415 Hurt 158 Unclear 97

Trade

-4

Helped 260 Hurt 264 Mixed 2 Unclear 102

Government Operations

-3

Helped 45 Hurt 48 Unclear 524

Transportation

-27

Helped 189 Hurt 216 Mixed 1 Unclear 171

Agriculture

+151

Helped 309 Hurt 158 Unclear 108

Criminal Justice

-3

Helped 235 Hurt 238 Mixed 4 Unclear 55

Housing

+60

Helped 213 Hurt 153 Unclear 37

Labor

+78

Helped 193 Hurt 115 Unclear 79

Military Procurement

+17

Helped 142 Hurt 125 Unclear 101

Environment

-83

Helped 62 Hurt 145 Unclear 139

Technology

+64

Helped 184 Hurt 120 Unclear 38

Tax

-131

Helped 101 Hurt 232 Unclear 3

Federal Budget

+162

Helped 207 Hurt 45 Unclear 36

Appropriations

+45

Helped 133 Hurt 88 Unclear 14

20 policy domains

Helped Hurt Mixed Unclear

Industry Impact Profile

19209 industry impacts

All entities →

How this is computed

P Primary sponsor · C Co-sponsor · Y Yea vote · N Nay vote

Weighted score (w:) uses strongest role per bill. Weights: Primary 1.0, Co-sponsor 0.3, Yea 0.1, Nay -0.1.

Bills where the legislator voted nay (without sponsorship) contribute -0.1 per bill. Equal yea and nay roll calls on the same bill contribute 0.

Vote date filters affect vote attribution; sponsorship is always included.

Positive-Effect Industries

Government 2327 P·3 C·89 Y·2236 N·1776 w:12.2

Direct (1806), Defense (128), Veterans Affairs (114), DoD (32), State (23), VA (19), Executive (16), USDA (16), Congress (14), Legislative (14), Treasury (13), Agriculture (11), Legislative Branch (11), Justice (10), Coast Guard (9), NPS (7), CMS (6), Oversight (6), DOJ (4), Education (4), Foreign Affairs (4), ICE (4), Judiciary (4), Local (4), Research (4), Medicare (3), Transportation (3), Army Corps (2), Cemeteries (2), DHS (2), FDA (2), FEMA (2), Housing (2), Interior/USDA (2), International Development (2), Military Logistics (2), NASA (2), NOAA (2), SBA (2), SSA (2), Defense R&D (1), EPA (1), Federal Executive (1), Federal Law Enforcement (1), HHS (1), IBWC (1), Intelligence (1), Judicial (1), Manufacturing (1), Municipal (1), National Security (1), Tribal (1)

General Public 700 P·1 C·95 Y·608 N·396 w:10.7

Direct (555), Veterans (121), Military Families (17), Military (3), Foreign (2), Tribal (2)

Military 412 P·1 C·6 Y·405 N·363 w:2.6

Direct (409), Air Force (2), Families (1)

Healthcare 410 P·16 C·87 Y·307 N·285 w:13.1

Direct (387), Research (15), Community (3), Tribal (3), Dialysis Patients (2)

Defense 383 C·6 Y·377 N·343 w:1.8

Direct (370), Naval (2), Testing (2), Ammunition (1), Ground Vehicles (1), Missiles (1), Missiles/Hypersonics (1), Nuclear C3 (1), Rotorcraft (1), Small Business (1), Small/Innovative (1), Space Systems (1)

Education 324 C·105 Y·219 N·174 w:7.4

Direct (315), Child Care (3), Maritime Training (2), Immigrant Students (1), Religious Studies (1), Research Universities (1), Technical (1)

Financial Services 281 P·2 C·92 Y·202 N·93 w:7.2

Direct (274), HSA (7)

Cryptocurrency 217 C·8 Y·209 w:0.5

Real Estate 216 C·174 Y·42 N·33 w:2.5

Direct (214), Rental (2)

Construction 192 P·5 C·2 Y·186 N·170 w:2.2

Direct (188), Energy Efficiency (1), Federal/Military (1), Military/Pacific (1), Utilities/Infrastructure (1)

Negative-Effect Industries

Government 2844 P·91 C·753 Y·2021 N·1114 w:77.1

Direct (2432), Defense (101), Veterans Affairs (69), Regulatory (43), EPA (30), Coast Guard (27), NPS (11), FDA (9), Education (8), Agriculture (7), BLM (7), Forest Service (7), SEC (7), HHS (6), Foreign (5), State (5), CFPB (4), Federal Child Welfare (4), Treasury/IRS (4), VA (4), Executive (3), Federal (3), Legislative (3), NOAA (3), NOAA/EPA (3), Natural Resources (3), Acquisition (2), Congress (2), Defense Acquisition (2), Executive Branch (2), Foreign Diplomatic (2), Law Enforcement (2), Military (2), USTR (2), CMS (1), DOE (1), DOJ (1), DoD (1), Energy Department (1), Energy/Defense (1), Environmental Regulation (1), Federal Immigration (1), Federal Law Enforcement (1), Intelligence (1), Interior Department (1), Local (1), NNSA (1), Science Agencies (1), Space Force (1), Strategic Command (1), Treasury (1), U.S. Coast Guard (1), USDA (1), Waste Management (1)

General Public 262 P·1 C·28 Y·237 N·157 w:4.7

Direct (235), Veterans (20), Family Sponsors (4), Environmental Health (1), Environmental Justice (1), Water Quality (1)

Taxpayers 247 P·8 C·154 Y·85 N·85 w:17.7

Military 244 Y·244 N·224 w:0.3

Direct (240), Intercontinental Ballistic Missile Systems (3), Space Force (1)

Defense 236 C·1 Y·235 N·212 w:0.6

Direct (232), Nuclear (2), Logistics (1), Maintenance (1)

Healthcare 218 P·7 C·65 Y·146 N·117 w:6.9

Direct (214), Family Planning Services (2), Public Health (2)

Education 216 C·69 Y·147 N·88 w:5.4

Financial Services 188 P·10 C·69 Y·115 N·56 w:10.2

Transportation 161 P·1 C·8 Y·152 N·70 w:2.7

Direct (153), Foreign (2), Technology (2), Tourism (2), Moving (1), Research Vessels (1)

Immigration 144 C·1 Y·143 N·134 w:0.5

Direct (137), Unaccompanied Minors (4), Undocumented (3)

Click any row to see supporting clauses

Showing positive and negative-direction effects only. Mixed and uncertain effects are not included in these counts.

Votes by Industry (Yea/Nay Alignment)

How this legislator's Yea/Nay votes landed across industries; distinct from overall bill exposure above.

Analysis coverage

100.0% of votes

Show vote-alignment table

S+ Supported Benefits

S- Supported Burdens

O+ Opposed Benefits

O- Opposed Burdens

Industry	O+	O-	Net
Government (75 sub) Sub-categories (total impacts, all buckets): Defense (229), Veterans Affairs (183), Coast Guard (36), DoD (33), EPA (31) +70 more			+335
General Public (8 sub) Sub-categories (total impacts, all buckets): Veterans (141), Military Families (17), Family Sponsors (4), Military (3), Foreign (2) +3 more			+369
Military (4 sub) Sub-categories (total impacts, all buckets): Intercontinental Ballistic Missile Systems (3), Air Force (2), Families (1), Space Force (1)	-		+167
Defense (14 sub) Sub-categories (total impacts, all buckets): Naval (2), Nuclear (2), Testing (2), Ammunition (1), Ground Vehicles (1) +9 more			+124
Healthcare (5 sub) Sub-categories (total impacts, all buckets): Research (15), Community (3), Tribal (3), Family Planning Services (2), Public Health (2)		-	+157
Education (6 sub) Sub-categories (total impacts, all buckets): Child Care (3), Maritime Training (2), Immigrant Students (1), Religious Studies (1), Research Universities (1) +1 more		-	+66
Cryptocurrency	-	-	+71
Transportation (6 sub) Sub-categories (total impacts, all buckets): Foreign (2), Labor (2), Technology (2), Tourism (2), Moving (1) +1 more		-	+20
Financial Services (1 sub) Sub-categories (total impacts, all buckets): HSA (7)			+41
State & Local Government (2 sub) Sub-categories (total impacts, all buckets): Medicaid (6), Non-Expansion (3)		-	+36
Construction (4 sub) Sub-categories (total impacts, all buckets): Federal Projects (1), Federal/Military (1), Military/Pacific (1), Utilities/Infrastructure (1)			+125
Manufacturing (4 sub) Sub-categories (total impacts, all buckets): Foreign (8), Electrical Equipment (2), Defense (1), Foreign Adversary (1)			+18
Taxpayers	-	-	+15
Agriculture (6 sub) Sub-categories (total impacts, all buckets): Coffee (2), Commodities (2), Hemp (2), Livestock (2), Coffee Production (1) +1 more			+141
Law Enforcement	-	-	+42

Votes are cast on entire bills; attribution to individual clauses does not imply clause-level intent. Learn more

Loading votes...