Back to Legislators

J. French Hill

Analysis

R AR-2 · House

2025–Present House Of Representatives (District 2)

2023–2025 House Of Representatives (District 2)

2021–2023 House Of Representatives (District 2)

2019–2021 House Of Representatives (District 2)

2017–2019 House Of Representatives (District 2)

2015–2017 House Of Representatives (District 2)

Defense

+151

Helped 1273 Hurt 1122 Unclear 1169

Finance

+156

Helped 1066 Hurt 910 Mixed 8 Unclear 1115

Healthcare

+234

Helped 538 Hurt 304 Unclear 350

Energy

-53

Helped 366 Hurt 419 Mixed 3 Unclear 261

Education

+38

Helped 346 Hurt 308 Unclear 236

Veterans Affairs

+253

Helped 408 Hurt 155 Mixed 3 Unclear 116

Agriculture

+143

Helped 303 Hurt 160 Unclear 137

Transportation

-16

Helped 219 Hurt 235 Unclear 142

Criminal Justice

-54

Helped 233 Hurt 287 Mixed 4 Unclear 58

Government Operations

+12

Helped 82 Hurt 70 Unclear 398

Housing

+164

Helped 282 Hurt 118 Unclear 117

Environment

-97

Helped 59 Hurt 156 Unclear 225

Trade

+47

Helped 208 Hurt 161 Mixed 2 Unclear 43

Military Procurement

+17

Helped 142 Hurt 125 Unclear 101

Immigration

-196

Helped 54 Hurt 250 Mixed 4 Unclear 33

Technology

+77

Helped 190 Hurt 113 Unclear 32

Federal Budget

+162

Helped 207 Hurt 45 Unclear 36

Labor

+12

Helped 96 Hurt 84 Unclear 92

Foreign Policy

+17

Helped 105 Hurt 88 Unclear 51

Financial Services

-87

Helped 56 Hurt 143 Unclear 39

20 policy domains

Helped Hurt Mixed Unclear

Industry Impact Profile

18329 industry impacts

All entities →

How this is computed

P Primary sponsor · C Co-sponsor · Y Yea vote · N Nay vote

Weighted score (w:) uses strongest role per bill. Weights: Primary 1.0, Co-sponsor 0.3, Yea 0.1, Nay -0.1.

Bills where the legislator voted nay (without sponsorship) contribute -0.1 per bill. Equal yea and nay roll calls on the same bill contribute 0.

Vote date filters affect vote attribution; sponsorship is always included.

Positive-Effect Industries

Government 2331 P·26 C·83 Y·2239 N·1776 w:16.6

Direct (1829), Defense (128), Veterans Affairs (114), DoD (32), State (19), VA (19), Executive (16), USDA (16), Legislative (14), Treasury (13), Legislative Branch (12), Agriculture (11), Congress (11), Coast Guard (9), NPS (7), CMS (6), Justice (6), Oversight (6), DOJ (4), Education (4), Foreign Affairs (4), ICE (4), Judiciary (4), Local (3), Transportation (3), Army Corps (2), Cemeteries (2), DHS (2), FDA (2), FEMA (2), Housing (2), Interior/USDA (2), International Development (2), Military Logistics (2), NASA (2), NOAA (2), SBA (2), SSA (2), Defense R&D (1), EPA (1), Federal Executive (1), Federal Law Enforcement (1), HHS (1), IBWC (1), Intelligence (1), Judicial (1), Manufacturing (1), Municipal (1), National Security (1)

General Public 646 P·67 C·41 Y·605 N·396 w:9.3

Direct (503), Veterans (121), Military Families (17), Military (3), Foreign (2)

Financial Services 533 P·337 C·83 Y·199 N·93 w:16.5

Direct (525), HSA (7), Brokers/Advisers (1)

Military 413 C·8 Y·405 N·363 w:1.6

Direct (410), Air Force (2), Families (1)

Defense 382 P·1 C·4 Y·377 N·343 w:2.2

Direct (369), Naval (2), Testing (2), Ammunition (1), Ground Vehicles (1), Missiles (1), Missiles/Hypersonics (1), Nuclear C3 (1), Rotorcraft (1), Small Business (1), Small/Innovative (1), Space Systems (1)

Healthcare 353 P·1 C·45 Y·307 N·285 w:4.3

Direct (332), Research (15), Community (3), Tribal (3)

Education 312 P·8 C·86 Y·219 N·174 w:6.3

Direct (303), Child Care (3), Maritime Training (2), Immigrant Students (1), Religious Studies (1), Research Universities (1), Technical (1)

Construction 220 P·34 C·1 Y·186 N·170 w:1.9

Direct (217), Federal/Military (1), Military/Pacific (1), Utilities/Infrastructure (1)

Cryptocurrency 218 P·190 C·8 Y·209 w:2.4

Transportation 212 C·35 Y·180 N·83 w:2.8

Direct (210), Labor (2)

Negative-Effect Industries

Government 2500 P·258 C·347 Y·2054 N·1114 w:52.3

Direct (2142), Defense (101), Veterans Affairs (69), EPA (30), Coast Guard (27), NPS (11), FDA (9), Education (8), Agriculture (7), BLM (7), Forest Service (7), SEC (7), HHS (6), Foreign (5), CFPB (4), Federal Child Welfare (4), Treasury/IRS (4), VA (4), Executive (3), Legislative (3), NOAA (3), NOAA/EPA (3), Natural Resources (3), Acquisition (2), Congress (2), Defense Acquisition (2), Foreign Diplomatic (2), Law Enforcement (2), Military (2), DOE (1), DOJ (1), DoD (1), Energy Department (1), Energy/Defense (1), Environmental Regulation (1), Federal (1), Federal Immigration (1), Federal Law Enforcement (1), Intelligence (1), Interior Department (1), NNSA (1), Science Agencies (1), Securities (1), Space Force (1), State (1), Strategic Command (1), Treasury (1), U.S. Coast Guard (1), USDA (1), Waste Management (1)

Financial Services 399 P·195 C·120 Y·115 N·56 w:17.0

Direct (398), Self-Regulatory (1)

General Public 253 C·17 Y·237 N·157 w:2.4

Direct (226), Veterans (20), Family Sponsors (4), Environmental Health (1), Environmental Justice (1), Water Quality (1)

Military 245 C·1 Y·244 N·224 w:0.6

Direct (241), Intercontinental Ballistic Missile Systems (3), Space Force (1)

Defense 237 C·2 Y·235 N·212 w:0.6

Direct (233), Nuclear (2), Logistics (1), Maintenance (1)

Education 205 P·2 C·41 Y·162 N·88 w:3.8

Transportation 172 C·20 Y·152 N·70 w:1.4

Direct (164), Foreign (2), Technology (2), Tourism (2), Moving (1), Research Vessels (1)

Healthcare 168 C·22 Y·146 N·117 w:1.9

Direct (164), Family Planning Services (2), Public Health (2)

Immigration 161 C·18 Y·143 N·134 w:0.8

Direct (154), Unaccompanied Minors (4), Undocumented (3)

Cryptocurrency 138 P·124 Y·138 w:1.1

Click any row to see supporting clauses

Showing positive and negative-direction effects only. Mixed and uncertain effects are not included in these counts.

Votes by Industry (Yea/Nay Alignment)

How this legislator's Yea/Nay votes landed across industries; distinct from overall bill exposure above.

Analysis coverage

100.0% of votes

Show vote-alignment table

S+ Supported Benefits

S- Supported Burdens

O+ Opposed Benefits

O- Opposed Burdens

Industry	O+	O-	Net
Government (75 sub) Sub-categories (total impacts, all buckets): Defense (229), Veterans Affairs (183), Coast Guard (36), DoD (33), EPA (31) +70 more			+305
General Public (8 sub) Sub-categories (total impacts, all buckets): Veterans (141), Military Families (17), Family Sponsors (4), Military (3), Foreign (2) +3 more			+366
Military (4 sub) Sub-categories (total impacts, all buckets): Intercontinental Ballistic Missile Systems (3), Air Force (2), Families (1), Space Force (1)	-		+167
Defense (14 sub) Sub-categories (total impacts, all buckets): Naval (2), Nuclear (2), Testing (2), Ammunition (1), Ground Vehicles (1) +9 more			+124
Healthcare (5 sub) Sub-categories (total impacts, all buckets): Research (15), Community (3), Tribal (3), Family Planning Services (2), Public Health (2)		-	+157
Education (6 sub) Sub-categories (total impacts, all buckets): Child Care (3), Maritime Training (2), Immigrant Students (1), Religious Studies (1), Research Universities (1) +1 more		-	+51
Cryptocurrency	-	-	+71
Transportation (6 sub) Sub-categories (total impacts, all buckets): Foreign (2), Labor (2), Technology (2), Tourism (2), Moving (1) +1 more		-	+20
Financial Services (1 sub) Sub-categories (total impacts, all buckets): HSA (7)			+38
State & Local Government (2 sub) Sub-categories (total impacts, all buckets): Medicaid (6), Non-Expansion (3)		-	+36
Construction (4 sub) Sub-categories (total impacts, all buckets): Federal Projects (1), Federal/Military (1), Military/Pacific (1), Utilities/Infrastructure (1)			+125
Manufacturing (4 sub) Sub-categories (total impacts, all buckets): Foreign (8), Electrical Equipment (2), Defense (1), Foreign Adversary (1)			+18
Taxpayers	-	-	+15
Agriculture (6 sub) Sub-categories (total impacts, all buckets): Coffee (2), Commodities (2), Hemp (2), Livestock (2), Coffee Production (1) +1 more			+141
Technology (10 sub) Sub-categories (total impacts, all buckets): Foreign (8), Cybersecurity (2), AI/Defense (1), Cloud Services (1), Commercial/Defense (1) +5 more			+48

Votes are cast on entire bills; attribution to individual clauses does not imply clause-level intent. Learn more

Loading votes...