Back to Legislators

Andy Harris

Analysis

R MD-1 · House

2025–Present House Of Representatives (District 1)

2023–2025 House Of Representatives (District 1)

2021–2023 House Of Representatives (District 1)

2019–2021 House Of Representatives (District 1)

2017–2019 House Of Representatives (District 1)

2015–2017 House Of Representatives (District 1)

2013–2015 House Of Representatives (District 1)

2011–2013 House Of Representatives (District 1)

Defense

+145

Helped 1264 Hurt 1119 Unclear 749

Healthcare

+165

Helped 662 Hurt 497 Unclear 397

Finance

+77

Helped 662 Hurt 585 Mixed 4 Unclear 285

Agriculture

+154

Helped 473 Hurt 319 Unclear 144

Energy

-66

Helped 305 Hurt 371 Mixed 3 Unclear 166

Education

Helped 256 Hurt 253 Unclear 209

Veterans Affairs

+259

Helped 410 Hurt 151 Unclear 85

Transportation

-49

Helped 181 Hurt 230 Unclear 110

Criminal Justice

+10

Helped 221 Hurt 211 Mixed 4 Unclear 58

Immigration

-206

Helped 67 Hurt 273 Mixed 4 Unclear 73

Trade

+47

Helped 197 Hurt 150 Mixed 2 Unclear 31

Military Procurement

+17

Helped 142 Hurt 125 Unclear 101

Government Operations

-10

Helped 46 Hurt 56 Unclear 219

Technology

+49

Helped 165 Hurt 116 Unclear 28

Housing

+125

Helped 193 Hurt 68 Unclear 35

Federal Budget

+162

Helped 207 Hurt 45 Unclear 36

Environment

-88

Helped 54 Hurt 142 Unclear 73

Appropriations

+45

Helped 133 Hurt 88 Unclear 14

Government

-68

Helped 0 Hurt 68 Unclear 134

Labor

-5

Helped 67 Hurt 72 Unclear 53

20 policy domains

Helped Hurt Mixed Unclear

Industry Impact Profile

17344 industry impacts

All entities →

How this is computed

P Primary sponsor · C Co-sponsor · Y Yea vote · N Nay vote

Weighted score (w:) uses strongest role per bill. Weights: Primary 1.0, Co-sponsor 0.3, Yea 0.1, Nay -0.1.

Bills where the legislator voted nay (without sponsorship) contribute -0.1 per bill. Equal yea and nay roll calls on the same bill contribute 0.

Vote date filters affect vote attribution; sponsorship is always included.

Positive-Effect Industries

Government 2390 P·92 C·48 Y·1574 N·2128 w:9.0

Direct (1885), Defense (128), Veterans Affairs (114), DoD (32), State (19), VA (19), Executive (16), USDA (16), Legislative (14), Legislative Branch (14), Treasury (13), Congress (12), Agriculture (11), Coast Guard (9), NPS (7), CMS (6), Justice (6), Oversight (6), DOJ (4), Education (4), Foreign Affairs (4), ICE (4), Judiciary (4), Local (3), Transportation (3), Army Corps (2), Cemeteries (2), DHS (2), FDA (2), FEMA (2), Housing (2), Interior/USDA (2), International Development (2), Military Logistics (2), NASA (2), NOAA (2), SBA (2), SSA (2), Defense R&D (1), EPA (1), Federal Executive (1), Federal Law Enforcement (1), HHS (1), IBWC (1), Intelligence (1), Judicial (1), Manufacturing (1), Municipal (1), National Security (1)

General Public 672 P·3 C·66 Y·492 N·472 w:7.5

Direct (529), Veterans (121), Military Families (17), Military (3), Foreign (2)

Military 406 C·1 Y·248 N·405 w:0.3

Direct (403), Air Force (2), Families (1)

Healthcare 400 C·93 Y·203 N·301 w:6.3

Direct (378), Research (15), Community (3), Tribal (3), Preventive Medicine (1)

Defense 381 C·4 Y·254 N·365 w:0.4

Direct (368), Naval (2), Testing (2), Ammunition (1), Ground Vehicles (1), Missiles (1), Missiles/Hypersonics (1), Nuclear C3 (1), Rotorcraft (1), Small Business (1), Small/Innovative (1), Space Systems (1)

Education 232 P·3 C·10 Y·166 N·196 w:3.0

Direct (223), Child Care (3), Maritime Training (2), Immigrant Students (1), Religious Studies (1), Research Universities (1), Technical (1)

Agriculture 222 P·37 C·17 Y·158 N·168 w:3.4

Direct (214), Coffee (2), Commodities (2), Hemp (2), Livestock (2)

Financial Services 219 C·17 Y·187 N·106 w:3.4

Direct (212), HSA (7)

Cryptocurrency 209 Y·189 N·20 w:0.0

Transportation 189 C·9 Y·63 N·171 w:1.3

Direct (187), Labor (2)

Negative-Effect Industries

Government 2426 P·34 C·338 Y·1479 N·1506 w:36.9

Direct (2065), Defense (101), Veterans Affairs (69), EPA (30), Coast Guard (27), NPS (11), FDA (9), Education (8), Agriculture (7), BLM (7), Forest Service (7), SEC (7), HHS (6), Foreign (5), CFPB (4), Federal Child Welfare (4), Treasury/IRS (4), VA (4), Executive (3), Legislative (3), Legislative Branch (3), NOAA (3), NOAA/EPA (3), Natural Resources (3), Acquisition (2), Congress (2), Defense Acquisition (2), Foreign Diplomatic (2), Law Enforcement (2), Military (2), Banking Regulation (1), DOE (1), DoD (1), Energy Department (1), Energy/Defense (1), Environmental Regulation (1), Federal (1), Federal Immigration (1), Federal Law Enforcement (1), Intelligence (1), Interior Department (1), Legislative Support (1), NNSA (1), Science Agencies (1), Space Force (1), State (1), Strategic Command (1), Treasury (1), U.S. Coast Guard (1), USDA (1), Waste Management (1)

General Public 291 P·1 C·57 Y·205 N·178 w:5.6

Direct (264), Veterans (20), Family Sponsors (4), Environmental Health (1), Environmental Justice (1), Water Quality (1)

Healthcare 246 C·100 Y·124 N·125 w:7.1

Direct (239), Family Planning Services (2), Public Health (2), Physicians (1), Reproductive Health (1), Reproductive Services (1)

Military 244 Y·145 N·244 w:-0.1

Direct (240), Intercontinental Ballistic Missile Systems (3), Space Force (1)

Defense 236 C·1 Y·139 N·220 w:0.2

Direct (232), Nuclear (2), Logistics (1), Maintenance (1)

Financial Services 177 C·62 Y·113 N·57 w:6.3

Education 174 C·12 Y·158 N·89 w:2.1

Transportation 174 C·22 Y·48 N·144 w:1.1

Direct (166), Foreign (2), Technology (2), Tourism (2), Moving (1), Research Vessels (1)

Immigration 147 C·4 Y·143 N·134 w:1.3

Direct (140), Unaccompanied Minors (4), Undocumented (3)

State & Local Government 140 C·45 Y·93 N·79 w:5.8

Direct (136), Non-Expansion (3), Health Regulation (1)

Click any row to see supporting clauses

Showing positive and negative-direction effects only. Mixed and uncertain effects are not included in these counts.

Votes by Industry (Yea/Nay Alignment)

How this legislator's Yea/Nay votes landed across industries; distinct from overall bill exposure above.

Analysis coverage

100.0% of votes

Show vote-alignment table

S+ Supported Benefits

S- Supported Burdens

O+ Opposed Benefits

O- Opposed Burdens

Industry	O+	O-	Net
Government (75 sub) Sub-categories (total impacts, all buckets): Defense (229), Veterans Affairs (183), Coast Guard (36), DoD (33), EPA (31) +70 more			+78
General Public (8 sub) Sub-categories (total impacts, all buckets): Veterans (141), Military Families (17), Family Sponsors (4), Military (3), Foreign (2) +3 more			+215
Military (4 sub) Sub-categories (total impacts, all buckets): Intercontinental Ballistic Missile Systems (3), Air Force (2), Families (1), Space Force (1)			+51
Defense (14 sub) Sub-categories (total impacts, all buckets): Naval (2), Nuclear (2), Testing (2), Ammunition (1), Ground Vehicles (1) +9 more			+70
Healthcare (5 sub) Sub-categories (total impacts, all buckets): Research (15), Community (3), Tribal (3), Family Planning Services (2), Public Health (2)			-7
Education (6 sub) Sub-categories (total impacts, all buckets): Child Care (3), Maritime Training (2), Immigrant Students (1), Religious Studies (1), Research Universities (1) +1 more			-41
Cryptocurrency			+59
Transportation (6 sub) Sub-categories (total impacts, all buckets): Foreign (2), Labor (2), Technology (2), Tourism (2), Moving (1) +1 more			-6
Financial Services (1 sub) Sub-categories (total impacts, all buckets): HSA (7)			+61
State & Local Government (2 sub) Sub-categories (total impacts, all buckets): Medicaid (6), Non-Expansion (3)			-66
Construction (4 sub) Sub-categories (total impacts, all buckets): Federal Projects (1), Federal/Military (1), Military/Pacific (1), Utilities/Infrastructure (1)			+55
Manufacturing (4 sub) Sub-categories (total impacts, all buckets): Foreign (8), Electrical Equipment (2), Defense (1), Foreign Adversary (1)			-2
Taxpayers	-	-	+15
Agriculture (6 sub) Sub-categories (total impacts, all buckets): Coffee (2), Commodities (2), Hemp (2), Livestock (2), Coffee Production (1) +1 more			+119
Law Enforcement			+60

Votes are cast on entire bills; attribution to individual clauses does not imply clause-level intent. Learn more

Loading votes...