Government Operations
48 bills 177 analyzed clauses
Explore affected groups
R WI-8 · House
Policy Effects
Estimated effects on people, organizations, and industries in bills this legislator sponsored, cosponsored, or voted on. Includes bills they voted against.
These are assessments of legislative text, not measurements of realized outcomes or the legislator’s intent.
This selection could not be loaded. Your current view is still available.
Open the requested selection in a full pageStart with a policy area to see the specific groups affected.
48 bills 177 analyzed clauses
Explore affected groups43 bills 108 analyzed clauses
Explore affected groups35 bills 96 analyzed clauses
Explore affected groups26 bills 54 analyzed clauses
Explore affected groups23 bills 102 analyzed clauses
Explore affected groups14 bills 33 analyzed clauses
Explore affected groups13 bills 31 analyzed clauses
Explore affected groups13 bills 18 analyzed clauses
Explore affected groups11 bills 23 analyzed clauses
Explore affected groups10 bills 23 analyzed clauses
Explore affected groups8 bills 15 analyzed clauses
Explore affected groups8 bills 11 analyzed clauses
Explore affected groups6 bills 44 analyzed clauses
Explore affected groups5 bills 15 analyzed clauses
Explore affected groups5 bills 8 analyzed clauses
Explore affected groups4 bills 7 analyzed clauses
Explore affected groups4 bills 5 analyzed clauses
Explore affected groups3 bills 7 analyzed clauses
Explore affected groups3 bills 6 analyzed clauses
Explore affected groups3 bills 6 analyzed clauses
Explore affected groups3 bills 5 analyzed clauses
Explore affected groups3 bills 4 analyzed clauses
Explore affected groups2 bills 3 analyzed clauses
Explore affected groups2 bills 3 analyzed clauses
Explore affected groups2 bills 2 analyzed clauses
Explore affected groups1 bill 12 analyzed clauses
Explore affected groups1 bill 4 analyzed clauses
Explore affected groups1 bill 3 analyzed clauses
Explore affected groups1 bill 1 analyzed clause
Explore affected groups1 bill 1 analyzed clause
Explore affected groups1 bill 1 analyzed clause
Explore affected groupsPotential benefits are effects assessed as favorable to the named group. Potential burdens impose costs, restrictions, risks, or lost opportunities on that group.
Mixed effects contain countervailing effects on the same group. Unclear effects have an undetermined direction. A group can have separate benefits and burdens; these are counted separately.
Counts describe the number of identified effects, not their size or public value. Bill and clause counts are distinct within each view. Shared evidence may appear under several groups or policy areas, so their counts should not be added together.
Historical bill versions are included. Clauses analyzed in different versions count separately. A bill’s current status does not establish that every analyzed provision was enacted.
Only direct effects with high or medium confidence in the policy-area assignment are included. Bills are connected through sponsorship, cosponsorship, or Yea/Nay votes; a vote against a bill does not reverse its assessed effects. Vote dates filter recorded votes and vote-linked bills; sponsorship remains included.
To impose certain conditions on the issuance of diplomatic and student visas to nationals of certain covered nations.
To establish a regional trade, investment, and people-to-people partnership of countries in the Western Hemisphere to stimulate growth and integration through viable long-term private sector development, and for other purposes.
To appropriate $25,000,000,000 for the construction of a border wall between the United States and Mexico, and for other purposes.
To amend the Immigration and Nationality Act to clarify the contempt authority of immigration judges, and for other purposes.
To provide for drone security.
To provide for congressional approval of national emergency declarations.
To amend the Immigration and Nationality Act to add membership in a significant transnational criminal organization to the list of grounds of inadmissibility and to prohibit the provision of material support or resources to such organizations.
To require the Secretary of Homeland Security to establish a Border Enforcement Security Task Force unit to investigate transnational criminal organization arms smuggling across the international border between the United States and Mexico, and for other purposes.
Loading countries...
Select a clause to see detailed analysis
Failed to load analysis
Please try again
Failed to load clauses
Please try again
Explore affected groups in Policy Effects to view supporting evidence. Existing clause links also open here.
Select a clause to see detailed analysis