Government Operations
69 bills 321 analyzed clauses
Explore affected groups
R NY-4 · House
Policy Effects
Estimated effects on people, organizations, and industries in bills this legislator sponsored, cosponsored, or voted on. Includes bills they voted against.
These are assessments of legislative text, not measurements of realized outcomes or the legislator’s intent.
This selection could not be loaded. Your current view is still available.
Open the requested selection in a full pageStart with a policy area to see the specific groups affected.
69 bills 321 analyzed clauses
Explore affected groups39 bills 119 analyzed clauses
Explore affected groups34 bills 171 analyzed clauses
Explore affected groups31 bills 446 analyzed clauses
Explore affected groups30 bills 239 analyzed clauses
Explore affected groups28 bills 91 analyzed clauses
Explore affected groups16 bills 66 analyzed clauses
Explore affected groups14 bills 113 analyzed clauses
Explore affected groups13 bills 22 analyzed clauses
Explore affected groups11 bills 83 analyzed clauses
Explore affected groups8 bills 53 analyzed clauses
Explore affected groups8 bills 19 analyzed clauses
Explore affected groups7 bills 21 analyzed clauses
Explore affected groups6 bills 9 analyzed clauses
Explore affected groups5 bills 11 analyzed clauses
Explore affected groups4 bills 23 analyzed clauses
Explore affected groups4 bills 15 analyzed clauses
Explore affected groups4 bills 15 analyzed clauses
Explore affected groups4 bills 7 analyzed clauses
Explore affected groups3 bills 24 analyzed clauses
Explore affected groups2 bills 10 analyzed clauses
Explore affected groups2 bills 6 analyzed clauses
Explore affected groups2 bills 3 analyzed clauses
Explore affected groups2 bills 2 analyzed clauses
Explore affected groups1 bill 12 analyzed clauses
Explore affected groups1 bill 11 analyzed clauses
Explore affected groups1 bill 6 analyzed clauses
Explore affected groups1 bill 5 analyzed clauses
Explore affected groups1 bill 5 analyzed clauses
Explore affected groups1 bill 3 analyzed clauses
Explore affected groups1 bill 1 analyzed clause
Explore affected groupsPotential benefits are effects assessed as favorable to the named group. Potential burdens impose costs, restrictions, risks, or lost opportunities on that group.
Mixed effects contain countervailing effects on the same group. Unclear effects have an undetermined direction. A group can have separate benefits and burdens; these are counted separately.
Counts describe the number of identified effects, not their size or public value. Bill and clause counts are distinct within each view. Shared evidence may appear under several groups or policy areas, so their counts should not be added together.
Historical bill versions are included. Clauses analyzed in different versions count separately. A bill’s current status does not establish that every analyzed provision was enacted.
Only direct effects with high or medium confidence in the policy-area assignment are included. Bills are connected through sponsorship, cosponsorship, or Yea/Nay votes; a vote against a bill does not reverse its assessed effects. Vote dates filter recorded votes and vote-linked bills; sponsorship remains included.
To provide for the reallocation of certain grant funds from jurisdictions that do not allow for consideration the danger, risk, or threat an individual poses to the community when determining bail or pretrial release or that have in effect a policy providing for the sealing of certain criminal records.
Resolution memorializing law enforcement officers killed in the line of duty.
To require a report by the Attorney General on the impact the border crisis is having on law enforcement at the Federal, State, local, and Tribal level.
To require the Attorney General to develop reports relating to violent attacks against law enforcement officers, and for other purposes.
To restore the right to negotiate matters pertaining to the discipline of law enforcement officers of the District of Columbia through collective bargaining, to restore the statute of limitations for bringing disciplinary cases against members or civilian employees of the Metropolitan Police Department of the District of Columbia, and for other purposes.
To reauthorize the Project Safe Neighborhoods Grant Program Authorization Act of 2018, and for other purposes.
To provide grants to State, local, territorial, and Tribal law enforcement agencies to purchase chemical screening devices and train personnel to use chemical screening devices in order to enhance law enforcement efficiency and protect law enforcement officers.
Expressing support for recognizing National Police Week.
To allow Federal law enforcement officers to purchase retired service weapons, and for other purposes.
To protect law enforcement officers, and for other purposes.
Supporting the designation of the week of April 23 through April 29, 2023, as National Crime Victims’ Rights Week.
To secure the international borders of the United States, and for other purposes.
Establishing a Bill of Rights to support United States law enforcement personnel nationwide in their work to protect our communities.
To make the assault of a law enforcement officer a deportable offense, and for other purposes.
Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives that the dedication and devotion of law enforcement personnel should be recognized and that calls to defund, disband, dismantle, or abolish the police should be condemned.
To amend the Controlled Substances Act with respect to the scheduling of fentanyl-related substances, and for other purposes.
To authorize grants for States, and units of local government that take efforts to stop enabling repeat violence, and for other purposes.
Loading countries...
Select a clause to see detailed analysis
Failed to load analysis
Please try again
Failed to load clauses
Please try again
Explore affected groups in Policy Effects to view supporting evidence. Existing clause links also open here.
Select a clause to see detailed analysis