Back to Legislators

Jodey C. Arrington

Analysis

R TX-19 · House

2025–Present House Of Representatives (District 19)

2023–2025 House Of Representatives (District 19)

2021–2023 House Of Representatives (District 19)

2019–2021 House Of Representatives (District 19)

2017–2019 House Of Representatives (District 19)

106

Defense

+155

Helped 1277 Hurt 1122 Unclear 803

Finance

+138

Helped 696 Hurt 558 Mixed 4 Unclear 362

Healthcare

+229

Helped 591 Hurt 362 Unclear 361

Energy

Helped 446 Hurt 445 Mixed 3 Unclear 225

Education

-32

Helped 267 Hurt 299 Unclear 198

Agriculture

+132

Helped 311 Hurt 179 Unclear 151

Veterans Affairs

+249

Helped 400 Hurt 151 Unclear 87

Trade

-21

Helped 235 Hurt 256 Mixed 2 Unclear 87

Transportation

-34

Helped 184 Hurt 218 Unclear 120

Criminal Justice

+22

Helped 216 Hurt 194 Mixed 4 Unclear 34

Government Operations

-8

Helped 45 Hurt 53 Unclear 309

Immigration

-197

Helped 75 Hurt 272 Mixed 4 Unclear 49

Environment

-76

Helped 98 Hurt 174 Unclear 116

Military Procurement

+17

Helped 142 Hurt 125 Unclear 101

Technology

+66

Helped 174 Hurt 108 Unclear 37

Regulated Industries

-184

Helped 17 Hurt 201 Unclear 86

Housing

+111

Helped 190 Hurt 79 Unclear 32

Federal Budget

+162

Helped 207 Hurt 45 Unclear 36

Appropriations

+40

Helped 149 Hurt 109 Unclear 14

Labor

-12

Helped 93 Hurt 105 Unclear 71

20 policy domains

Helped Hurt Mixed Unclear

Industry Impact Profile

17739 industry impacts

All entities →

How this is computed

P Primary sponsor · C Co-sponsor · Y Yea vote · N Nay vote

Weighted score (w:) uses strongest role per bill. Weights: Primary 1.0, Co-sponsor 0.3, Yea 0.1, Nay -0.1.

Bills where the legislator voted nay (without sponsorship) contribute -0.1 per bill. Equal yea and nay roll calls on the same bill contribute 0.

Vote date filters affect vote attribution; sponsorship is always included.

Positive-Effect Industries

Government 2336 P·368 C·67 Y·2239 N·1779 w:16.1

Direct (1810), Defense (128), Veterans Affairs (114), DoD (32), Legislative Branch (19), State (19), VA (19), Legislative (17), Executive (16), USDA (16), Congress (14), Treasury (13), Agriculture (11), Justice (10), Coast Guard (9), NPS (7), CMS (6), Oversight (6), DOJ (4), Education (4), Foreign Affairs (4), ICE (4), Judiciary (4), Research (4), Local (3), Medicare (3), Transportation (3), Army Corps (2), Cemeteries (2), DHS (2), FDA (2), FEMA (2), Housing (2), Interior/USDA (2), International Development (2), Military Logistics (2), NASA (2), NOAA (2), SBA (2), SSA (2), Defense R&D (1), EPA (1), Federal Executive (1), Federal Law Enforcement (1), HHS (1), IBWC (1), Intelligence (1), Judicial (1), Manufacturing (1), Municipal (1), National Security (1)

General Public 653 P·65 C·38 Y·613 N·396 w:9.4

Direct (510), Veterans (121), Military Families (17), Military (3), Foreign (2)

Military 408 P·21 C·3 Y·405 N·363 w:2.2

Direct (405), Air Force (2), Families (1)

Defense 379 P·37 Y·377 N·343 w:2.5

Direct (366), Naval (2), Testing (2), Ammunition (1), Ground Vehicles (1), Missiles (1), Missiles/Hypersonics (1), Nuclear C3 (1), Rotorcraft (1), Small Business (1), Small/Innovative (1), Space Systems (1)

Healthcare 334 P·62 C·12 Y·307 N·285 w:9.1

Direct (313), Research (15), Community (3), Tribal (3)

Financial Services 233 P·61 C·19 Y·199 N·90 w:8.4

Direct (226), HSA (7)

Education 230 P·101 C·4 Y·218 N·175 w:5.9

Direct (221), Child Care (3), Maritime Training (2), Immigrant Students (1), Religious Studies (1), Research Universities (1), Technical (1)

Cryptocurrency 217 C·8 Y·209 w:0.5

Transportation 202 P·31 C·2 Y·180 N·83 w:2.8

Direct (200), Labor (2)

Agriculture 188 P·86 C·2 Y·168 N·162 w:5.8

Direct (180), Coffee (2), Commodities (2), Hemp (2), Livestock (2)

Negative-Effect Industries

Government 2745 P·463 C·382 Y·2040 N·1113 w:61.9

Direct (2330), Defense (102), Veterans Affairs (69), Regulatory (43), EPA (30), Coast Guard (27), NPS (11), FDA (9), Education (8), Agriculture (7), BLM (7), Forest Service (7), SEC (7), HHS (6), Health (6), Foreign (5), CFPB (4), Federal Child Welfare (4), Treasury/IRS (4), VA (4), Executive (3), Legislative (3), Legislative Branch (3), NOAA (3), NOAA/EPA (3), Natural Resources (3), Acquisition (2), Congress (2), Defense Acquisition (2), Executive Branch (2), Foreign Diplomatic (2), Law Enforcement (2), Military (2), USDA (2), USTR (2), Banking Regulation (1), DOE (1), DoD (1), Energy Department (1), Energy/Defense (1), Environmental Regulation (1), Federal (1), Federal Immigration (1), Federal Law Enforcement (1), Intelligence (1), Interior Department (1), NNSA (1), Science Agencies (1), Space Force (1), State (1), Strategic Command (1), Treasury (1), U.S. Coast Guard (1), Waste Management (1)

General Public 274 P·63 C·59 Y·231 N·156 w:7.9

Direct (247), Veterans (20), Family Sponsors (4), Environmental Health (1), Environmental Justice (1), Water Quality (1)

Military 244 P·4 Y·244 N·224 w:1.2

Direct (240), Intercontinental Ballistic Missile Systems (3), Space Force (1)

Defense 236 P·1 C·1 Y·235 N·212 w:1.5

Direct (232), Nuclear (2), Logistics (1), Maintenance (1)

Education 194 P·91 C·20 Y·162 N·88 w:6.1

Transportation 174 P·26 C·17 Y·152 N·70 w:5.3

Direct (166), Foreign (2), Technology (2), Tourism (2), Moving (1), Research Vessels (1)

Healthcare 171 P·54 C·21 Y·146 N·117 w:5.5

Direct (167), Family Planning Services (2), Public Health (2)

Financial Services 148 P·46 C·25 Y·115 N·50 w:8.0

Immigration 147 P·129 C·2 Y·143 N·134 w:2.7

Direct (140), Unaccompanied Minors (4), Undocumented (3)

Cryptocurrency 138 Y·138 w:0.2

Click any row to see supporting clauses

Showing positive and negative-direction effects only. Mixed and uncertain effects are not included in these counts.

Votes by Industry (Yea/Nay Alignment)

How this legislator's Yea/Nay votes landed across industries; distinct from overall bill exposure above.

Analysis coverage

100.0% of votes

Show vote-alignment table

S+ Supported Benefits

S- Supported Burdens

O+ Opposed Benefits

O- Opposed Burdens

Industry	O+	O-	Net
Government (75 sub) Sub-categories (total impacts, all buckets): Defense (229), Veterans Affairs (183), Coast Guard (36), DoD (33), EPA (31) +70 more			+305
General Public (8 sub) Sub-categories (total impacts, all buckets): Veterans (141), Military Families (17), Family Sponsors (4), Military (3), Foreign (2) +3 more			+378
Military (4 sub) Sub-categories (total impacts, all buckets): Intercontinental Ballistic Missile Systems (3), Air Force (2), Families (1), Space Force (1)	-		+167
Defense (14 sub) Sub-categories (total impacts, all buckets): Naval (2), Nuclear (2), Testing (2), Ammunition (1), Ground Vehicles (1) +9 more			+124
Healthcare (5 sub) Sub-categories (total impacts, all buckets): Research (15), Community (3), Tribal (3), Family Planning Services (2), Public Health (2)		-	+157
Education (6 sub) Sub-categories (total impacts, all buckets): Child Care (3), Maritime Training (2), Immigrant Students (1), Religious Studies (1), Research Universities (1) +1 more		-	+51
Cryptocurrency	-	-	+71
Transportation (6 sub) Sub-categories (total impacts, all buckets): Foreign (2), Labor (2), Technology (2), Tourism (2), Moving (1) +1 more		-	+20
Financial Services (1 sub) Sub-categories (total impacts, all buckets): HSA (7)			+35
State & Local Government (2 sub) Sub-categories (total impacts, all buckets): Medicaid (6), Non-Expansion (3)	-		+47
Construction (4 sub) Sub-categories (total impacts, all buckets): Federal Projects (1), Federal/Military (1), Military/Pacific (1), Utilities/Infrastructure (1)	-	-	+141
Manufacturing (4 sub) Sub-categories (total impacts, all buckets): Foreign (8), Electrical Equipment (2), Defense (1), Foreign Adversary (1)			+32
Taxpayers	-	-	+15
Agriculture (6 sub) Sub-categories (total impacts, all buckets): Coffee (2), Commodities (2), Hemp (2), Livestock (2), Coffee Production (1) +1 more	-	-	+153
Technology (10 sub) Sub-categories (total impacts, all buckets): Foreign (8), Cybersecurity (2), AI/Defense (1), Cloud Services (1), Commercial/Defense (1) +5 more			+50

Votes are cast on entire bills; attribution to individual clauses does not imply clause-level intent. Learn more

Loading votes...