Back to Legislators

Alma S. Adams

Analysis

D NC-12 · House

2025–Present House Of Representatives (District 12)

2023–2025 House Of Representatives (District 12)

2021–2023 House Of Representatives (District 12)

2019–2021 House Of Representatives (District 12)

2017–2019 House Of Representatives (District 12)

2015–2017 House Of Representatives (District 12)

2014–2015 House Of Representatives (District 12)

Defense

+153

Helped 1306 Hurt 1153 Unclear 827

Healthcare

+394

Helped 1031 Hurt 637 Mixed 39 Unclear 788

Education

+210

Helped 999 Hurt 789 Unclear 510

Finance

-159

Helped 746 Hurt 905 Mixed 4 Unclear 350

Energy

-52

Helped 353 Hurt 405 Mixed 3 Unclear 192

Labor

+180

Helped 412 Hurt 232 Unclear 309

Agriculture

+126

Helped 377 Hurt 251 Unclear 140

Government Operations

-18

Helped 45 Hurt 63 Unclear 626

Veterans Affairs

+259

Helped 417 Hurt 158 Unclear 106

Criminal Justice

-68

Helped 256 Hurt 324 Mixed 4 Unclear 46

Environment

-50

Helped 167 Hurt 217 Unclear 224

Transportation

-46

Helped 207 Hurt 253 Unclear 111

Immigration

-123

Helped 156 Hurt 279 Mixed 4 Unclear 48

Housing

+149

Helped 260 Hurt 111 Unclear 33

Civil Rights

+94

Helped 225 Hurt 131 Unclear 44

Trade

+17

Helped 185 Hurt 168 Mixed 2 Unclear 37

Technology

+41

Helped 186 Hurt 145 Unclear 45

Military Procurement

+17

Helped 142 Hurt 125 Unclear 101

Federal Budget

+162

Helped 207 Hurt 45 Unclear 36

Higher Education

-181

Helped 28 Hurt 209 Unclear 23

20 policy domains

Helped Hurt Mixed Unclear

Industry Impact Profile

22979 industry impacts

All entities →

How this is computed

P Primary sponsor · C Co-sponsor · Y Yea vote · N Nay vote

Weighted score (w:) uses strongest role per bill. Weights: Primary 1.0, Co-sponsor 0.3, Yea 0.1, Nay -0.1.

Bills where the legislator voted nay (without sponsorship) contribute -0.1 per bill. Equal yea and nay roll calls on the same bill contribute 0.

Vote date filters affect vote attribution; sponsorship is always included.

Positive-Effect Industries

Government 2385 C·135 Y·2188 N·1514 w:12.9

Direct (1871), Defense (128), Veterans Affairs (114), DoD (32), Legislative Branch (19), State (19), VA (19), Executive (16), USDA (16), Legislative (14), Agriculture (11), Congress (11), Treasury (11), Coast Guard (9), NPS (7), CMS (6), Justice (6), Oversight (6), DOJ (4), Education (4), Foreign Affairs (4), ICE (4), Judiciary (4), Research (4), Local (3), Medicare (3), Transportation (3), Army Corps (2), Cemeteries (2), DHS (2), FDA (2), FEMA (2), Housing (2), Interior/USDA (2), International Development (2), Military Logistics (2), NASA (2), NOAA (2), SBA (2), SSA (2), Defense R&D (1), EPA (1), Federal Executive (1), Federal Law Enforcement (1), HHS (1), IBWC (1), Intelligence (1), Judicial (1), Manufacturing (1), Municipal (1), National Security (1)

Education 922 P·75 C·628 Y·207 N·155 w:26.0

Direct (912), Child Care (3), Maritime Training (2), Immigrant Students (1), Professional Development (1), Religious Studies (1), Research Universities (1), Technical (1)

General Public 823 P·13 C·197 Y·503 N·470 w:17.0

Direct (679), Veterans (121), Military Families (17), Military (3), Foreign (2), Black Maternal Health Beneficiaries (1)

Healthcare 583 P·4 C·272 Y·307 N·197 w:9.7

Direct (555), Research (15), Patients (5), Community (3), Tribal (3), Perinatal Care (1), Reproductive Health (1)

Military 415 C·10 Y·405 N·248 w:1.7

Direct (412), Air Force (2), Families (1)

Defense 379 C·2 Y·377 N·242 w:0.7

Direct (366), Naval (2), Testing (2), Ammunition (1), Ground Vehicles (1), Missiles (1), Missiles/Hypersonics (1), Nuclear C3 (1), Rotorcraft (1), Small Business (1), Small/Innovative (1), Space Systems (1)

Labor 302 P·2 C·255 Y·41 N·26 w:11.1

Direct (301), Maritime (1)

Financial Services 250 P·4 C·44 Y·107 N·186 w:7.6

Direct (243), HSA (7)

Agriculture 244 P·43 C·33 Y·168 N·158 w:9.2

Direct (234), Coffee (2), Commodities (2), Hemp (2), Livestock (2), Food Hub Purchasers (1), Socially Disadvantaged Farmers (1)

State & Local Government 216 C·77 Y·136 N·73 w:6.6

Direct (210), Medicaid (6)

Negative-Effect Industries

Government 3605 P·112 C·1426 Y·1653 N·1322 w:78.8

Direct (3197), Defense (101), Veterans Affairs (69), Regulatory (43), EPA (30), Coast Guard (27), NPS (11), FDA (9), Education (8), Agriculture (7), BLM (7), Forest Service (7), SEC (7), HHS (6), CMS (5), Foreign (5), CFPB (4), Federal Child Welfare (4), Treasury/IRS (4), VA (4), Executive (3), Legislative (3), Legislative Branch (3), NOAA (3), NOAA/EPA (3), Natural Resources (3), Acquisition (2), Congress (2), Defense Acquisition (2), Foreign Diplomatic (2), Law Enforcement (2), Military (2), DOE (1), DOJ (1), DoD (1), Energy Department (1), Energy/Defense (1), Environmental Regulation (1), Federal (1), Federal Immigration (1), Federal Law Enforcement (1), Intelligence (1), Interior Department (1), NNSA (1), Science Agencies (1), Space Force (1), State (1), Strategic Command (1), Treasury (1), U.S. Coast Guard (1), USDA (1), Waste Management (1)

Education 445 P·34 C·249 Y·90 N·157 w:18.4

Taxpayers 353 P·14 C·254 Y·85 N·85 w:19.0

Financial Services 285 P·10 C·160 Y·85 N·85 w:12.2

Defense 248 C·13 Y·220 N·139 w:1.0

Direct (244), Nuclear (2), Logistics (1), Maintenance (1)

General Public 247 P·1 C·9 Y·189 N·195 w:2.0

Direct (220), Veterans (20), Family Sponsors (4), Environmental Health (1), Environmental Justice (1), Water Quality (1)

Healthcare 245 C·99 Y·128 N·121 w:3.8

Direct (241), Family Planning Services (2), Public Health (2)

Military 244 Y·244 N·145 w:-0.2

Direct (240), Intercontinental Ballistic Missile Systems (3), Space Force (1)

State & Local Government 219 P·3 C·115 Y·84 N·88 w:8.4

Direct (216), Non-Expansion (3)

Small Business 199 P·3 C·154 Y·21 N·42 w:10.4

Click any row to see supporting clauses

Showing positive and negative-direction effects only. Mixed and uncertain effects are not included in these counts.

Votes by Industry (Yea/Nay Alignment)

How this legislator's Yea/Nay votes landed across industries; distinct from overall bill exposure above.

Analysis coverage

100.0% of votes

Show vote-alignment table

S+ Supported Benefits

S- Supported Burdens

O+ Opposed Benefits

O- Opposed Burdens

Industry	S+	S-	Net
Government (75 sub) Sub-categories (total impacts, all buckets): Defense (229), Veterans Affairs (183), Coast Guard (36), DoD (33), EPA (31) +70 more			-235
General Public (8 sub) Sub-categories (total impacts, all buckets): Veterans (141), Military Families (17), Family Sponsors (4), Military (3), Foreign (2) +3 more			-184
Military (4 sub) Sub-categories (total impacts, all buckets): Intercontinental Ballistic Missile Systems (3), Air Force (2), Families (1), Space Force (1)			-45
Defense (14 sub) Sub-categories (total impacts, all buckets): Naval (2), Nuclear (2), Testing (2), Ammunition (1), Ground Vehicles (1) +9 more			-64
Healthcare (5 sub) Sub-categories (total impacts, all buckets): Research (15), Community (3), Tribal (3), Family Planning Services (2), Public Health (2)			+9
Education (6 sub) Sub-categories (total impacts, all buckets): Child Care (3), Maritime Training (2), Immigrant Students (1), Religious Studies (1), Research Universities (1) +1 more			+61
Cryptocurrency	-	-	-71
Transportation (6 sub) Sub-categories (total impacts, all buckets): Foreign (2), Labor (2), Technology (2), Tourism (2), Moving (1) +1 more			+2
Financial Services (1 sub) Sub-categories (total impacts, all buckets): HSA (7)			-115
State & Local Government (2 sub) Sub-categories (total impacts, all buckets): Medicaid (6), Non-Expansion (3)			+68
Construction (4 sub) Sub-categories (total impacts, all buckets): Federal Projects (1), Federal/Military (1), Military/Pacific (1), Utilities/Infrastructure (1)			-69
Manufacturing (4 sub) Sub-categories (total impacts, all buckets): Foreign (8), Electrical Equipment (2), Defense (1), Foreign Adversary (1)			-6
Taxpayers	-	-	-15
Agriculture (6 sub) Sub-categories (total impacts, all buckets): Coffee (2), Commodities (2), Hemp (2), Livestock (2), Coffee Production (1) +1 more		-	-133
Law Enforcement			-44

Votes are cast on entire bills; attribution to individual clauses does not imply clause-level intent. Learn more

Loading votes...