S823-119

In Committee

Intergovernmental Critical Minerals Task Force Act

119th Congress Introduced Mar 3, 2025

Summary

What This Bill Does

The bill creates congressional findings establishing that U.S. critical mineral supply chains pose national security risks due to heavy import reliance on China, which produces 30 of 50 critical minerals and has engaged in trade and establishes an Intergovernmental Critical Minerals Task Force within the Executive Office of the President, requiring participation from 23+ federal agencies, to assess U.S. It relies on reporting requirements. The main policy areas are Energy, National Security, Trade, and Defense.

Who Benefits and How

Domestic mining and mineral extraction companies could gain revenue opportunities, Critical mineral processing and refining companies could gain revenue opportunities, and Defense contractors reliant on critical minerals could face reduced risk.

Who Bears the Burden and How

Federal agencies (23+ departments and agencies) would take on compliance duties.

Key Provisions

  • Creates congressional findings establishing that U.S. critical mineral supply chains pose national security risks due to heavy import reliance on China, which produces 30 of 50 critical minerals and has engaged in trade...
  • Establishes an Intergovernmental Critical Minerals Task Force within the Executive Office of the President, requiring participation from 23+ federal agencies, to assess U.S.

Evidence Chain:

This summary is generated from the full bill text using AI analysis. Expand "Detailed Analysis" below for identified beneficiaries/burden bearers with clause-level evidence links.

At a Glance

What This Bill Does

The bill creates congressional findings establishing that U.S. critical mineral supply chains pose national security risks due to heavy import reliance on China, which produces 30 of 50 critical minerals and has engaged in trade and establishes an Intergovernmental Critical Minerals Task Force within the Executive Office of the President, requiring participation from 23+ federal agencies, to assess U.S.

Key Policy Areas

Energy, National Security, Trade, Defense

Primary Purpose

The bill creates congressional findings establishing that U.S. critical mineral supply chains pose national security risks due to heavy import reliance on China, which produces 30 of 50 critical minerals and has engaged in trade and establishes an Intergovernmental Critical Minerals Task Force within the Executive Office of the President, requiring participation from 23+ federal agencies, to assess U.S.

Policy Domains

Energy National Security Trade Defense

Section 1 - Short Title

Identified Gains
  • Domestic mining and mineral extraction companies
  • Critical mineral processing and refining companies
  • Defense contractors reliant on critical minerals
  • Allied countries mining companies (NATO, Quad, Abraham Accords)
Model: codex-gpt-5:bulk-repair | Version: bill_summary_v2 | Source: is
Defense contractors reliant on critical minerals:
Domestic mining and mineral extraction companies:
Critical mineral processing and refining companies:
Allied countries mining companies (NATO, Quad, Abraham Accords):
Identified Costs
  • Federal agencies (23+ departments and agencies)
Model: codex-gpt-5:bulk-repair | Version: bill_summary_v2 | Source: is
Federal agencies (23+ departments and agencies):

Legislative Progress

In Committee
Introduced Committee Passed
Mar 3, 2025

Read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security …

Mar 3, 2025

Introduced in Senate

Stakeholder Effects

cui bono?

How this legislation distributes effects. Mention counts reflect frequency, not effect magnitude.

Oil & Gas
1 mention across 1 clause
+1 positive

Domestic mining and mineral extraction companies

Manufacturing
1 mention across 1 clause
+1 positive

Critical mineral processing and refining companies

Government
1 mention across 1 clause
-1 negative

Federal agencies (23+ departments and agencies)

Defense
1 mention across 1 clause
+1 positive

Defense contractors reliant on critical minerals

Mining
1 mention across 1 clause
+1 positive

Allied countries mining companies (NATO, Quad, Abraham Accords)

2/3
sections analyzed
Full impact breakdown

Bill Structure & Actor Mappings

Who is "The Secretary" in each section?

Domains
Energy National Security Trade Defense
Domains
National Security Trade Policy
Domains
National Security Mining & Minerals Intergovernmental Relations
Actor Mappings
"task_force"
→ Intergovernmental Critical Minerals Task Force
"chairperson"
→ Chairperson or Co-Chairpersons of the task force (designated by President - National Security Advisor, Economic Policy Advisor, or other Executive Office member)
"the_president"
→ President of the United States
"secretary_of_state"
→ Secretary of State
"comptroller_general"
→ Comptroller General of the United States
"secretary_of_commerce"
→ Secretary of Commerce

Key Definitions

Terms defined in this bill

4 terms
"appropriate committees of Congress" §2(A)

Senate: Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs, Energy and Natural Resources, Armed Services, Environment and Public Works, Commerce Science and Transportation, Finance, Foreign Relations. House: Oversight and Government Reform, Natural Resources, Armed Services, Ways and Means, Foreign Affairs, Energy and Commerce.

"covered country" §2(C)

A covered nation as defined in 10 USC 4872(d), or any other country determined by the task force to be a geostrategic competitor or adversary of the United States with respect to critical minerals.

"critical mineral" §2(D)

Has the meaning given the term 'critical material' in section 7002(a) of the Energy Act of 2020 (30 U.S.C. 1606(a)).

"Indian Tribe" §2(E)

Has the meaning given the term in section 4 of the Indian Self-Determination and Education Assistance Act (25 U.S.C. 5304).

We use a combination of our own taxonomy and classification in addition to large language models to assess meaning and potential beneficiaries. High confidence means strong textual evidence. Always verify with the original bill text.

Learn more about our methodology