S55-119

Introduced

To preserve the constitutional authority of Congress and ensure accountability and transparency in legislation.

119th Congress Introduced Jan 9, 2025

Analysis under review: This bill has generated analysis that may be too generic or incomplete. Clause-level evidence remains available below.

Summary

The Read the Bills Act would fundamentally change how Congress passes legislation. It requires every bill to cite its specific constitutional authority and show the full text of current law alongside proposed changes. Before any vote, bills must be posted online for at least 7 days and read aloud in full to a quorum of each chamber. Every member voting in favor must sign an affidavit under penalty of perjury attesting they read or listened to the entire bill. None of these requirements can be waived by unanimous consent or procedural maneuver. Any law passed in violation of these rules has no legal force, and aggrieved citizens or Members of Congress can sue to block enforcement of improperly passed laws.

Evidence Chain:

This summary is generated from the full bill text using AI analysis. Expand "Detailed Analysis" below for identified beneficiaries/burden bearers.

At a Glance

What This Bill Does

Reform Congressional legislative procedures to require full reading, public posting, constitutional authority citation, and current-law comparison for all bills before a vote, with enforcement through judicial review.

Who Benefits

  • General public (increased legislative transparency)
  • Minority-party legislators (harder to ram through bills without full deliberation)
  • Government accountability advocates

Who Bears Costs

  • Congressional leadership (loss of procedural flexibility)
  • Members of Congress (affidavit and reading requirements)
  • Congressional staff (compliance workload)

Key Policy Areas

{'domain': 'Government Operations', 'evidence': 'Restructures Congressional voting procedures, mandates full text reading, 7-day public posting, and affidavit requirements before final passage (Sec 105c)'}, {'domain': 'Transparency and Accountability', 'evidence': 'Bills must cite specific constitutional authority (Sec 105a), show current law alongside amendments (Sec 105b), and be posted on open-format websites (Sec 105c)'}, {'domain': 'Judicial', 'evidence': 'Creates private right of action and standing for aggrieved persons and Members of Congress to challenge laws passed in violation of these procedures (Sec 105d)'}

Primary Purpose

Reform Congressional legislative procedures to require full reading, public posting, constitutional authority citation, and current-law comparison for all bills before a vote, with enforcement through judicial review.

Policy Domains

{'domain': 'Government Operations', 'evidence': 'Restructures Congressional voting procedures, mandates full text reading, 7-day public posting, and affidavit requirements before final passage (Sec 105c)'} {'domain': 'Transparency and Accountability', 'evidence': 'Bills must cite specific constitutional authority (Sec 105a), show current law alongside amendments (Sec 105b), and be posted on open-format websites (Sec 105c)'} {'domain': 'Judicial', 'evidence': 'Creates private right of action and standing for aggrieved persons and Members of Congress to challenge laws passed in violation of these procedures (Sec 105d)'}

Legislative Strategy

"Imposes strict procedural transparency requirements on Congress itself, with a non-waivable enforcement mechanism (judicial review) that would fundamentally slow the legislative process and make large omnibus bills extremely difficult to pass."

Legislative Progress

Introduced
Introduced Committee Passed
Jan 9, 2025

Mr. Paul introduced the following bill; which was read twice …

Stakeholder Effects

cui bono?

How this legislation distributes effects. Mention counts reflect frequency, not effect magnitude.

Government
13 mentions across 7 clauses
+1 positive -10 negative ?2 uncertain

Congress (both chambers), Congress (institutional accountability), Congress (institutional)

Positive-direction: Members of Congress (minority party)

Negative-direction: Congress (both chambers), Congressional committees and conference committees, Congressional leadership (procedural flexibility), Congressional leadership and floor managers, Executive branch agencies enforcing potentially non-compliant laws, Federal courts, Federal judiciary, Members of Congress and congressional staff, Members of Congress introducing legislation, Members of Congress voting in favor of legislation

General Public
5 mentions across 5 clauses
+5 positive

Citizens aggrieved by improperly passed laws, Constitutional accountability advocates, General public

Lobbying
1 mention across 1 clause
-1 negative

Special interests relying on opaque legislative processes

7/10
sections analyzed
Full impact breakdown

Bill Structure & Actor Mappings

Who is "The Secretary" in each section?

Domains
Government Operations
Actor Mappings
"clerk"
→ Clerk of the House / Secretary of the Senate
Domains
Government Operations Transparency and Accountability
Actor Mappings
"clerk"
→ Clerk of the House / Secretary of the Senate
Domains
Government Operations Transparency and Accountability
Actor Mappings
"clerk"
→ Clerk of the House / Secretary of the Senate
"members"
→ Senators and Representatives
Domains
Judicial Government Operations
Actor Mappings
"aggrieved_person"
→ Person aggrieved by enforcement of non-compliant law
"member_of_congress"
→ Member of Congress aggrieved by procedural failure

We use a combination of our own taxonomy and classification in addition to large language models to assess meaning and potential beneficiaries. High confidence means strong textual evidence. Always verify with the original bill text.

Learn more about our methodology