S5329-118

Introduced

To amend section 321 of the Tariff Act of 1930 to enhance transparency with respect to shipments seeking an administrative exemption from duties for low-value entries, and for other purposes.

118th Congress Introduced Nov 14, 2024

Analysis under review: This bill has generated analysis that may be too generic or incomplete. Clause-level evidence remains available below.

Summary

What This Bill Does

The FIGHTING for America Act reforms the de minimis exemption that allows duty-free entry for low-value shipments (under $800). It requires detailed information for all such shipments, excludes certain product categories from the exemption, and imposes a $2 per-shipment processing fee. The bill targets abuse of this exemption for smuggling fentanyl and counterfeit goods.

Who Benefits and How

U.S. domestic manufacturers benefit from removal of tariff advantages for foreign competitors using de minimis shipping. U.S. workers in industries affected by dumping/countervailing duties gain protection. Customs and Border Protection receives additional resources through the $2 per-shipment fee. Intellectual property holders gain improved information sharing about suspected counterfeits.

Who Bears the Burden and How

E-commerce platforms (like Shein, Temu) and their Chinese suppliers face significant new compliance requirements and loss of duty-free status. Express delivery companies (FedEx, UPS, DHL) face new data submission requirements. Importers of goods subject to trade remedies lose de minimis eligibility. Consumers may face higher prices as duties are collected on previously exempt goods.

Key Provisions

  • Requires 10-digit HTS classification and detailed shipper information for de minimis shipments
  • Excludes goods subject to antidumping/CVD orders, Section 301/232 tariffs, and quotas from de minimis
  • Imposes $2 customs user fee per de minimis shipment
  • Designates fentanyl smuggling via de minimis as priority trade enforcement issue

Evidence Chain:

This summary is generated from the full bill text using AI analysis. Expand "Detailed Analysis" below for identified beneficiaries/burden bearers.

At a Glance

What This Bill Does

Reforms the de minimis exemption (Section 321) for low-value imports to combat fentanyl smuggling, counterfeit goods, and duty evasion while protecting U.S. workers and collecting additional customs revenue

Key Policy Areas

Trade, Customs Enforcement, National Security, Consumer Protection

Primary Purpose

Reforms the de minimis exemption (Section 321) for low-value imports to combat fentanyl smuggling, counterfeit goods, and duty evasion while protecting U.S. workers and collecting additional customs revenue

Policy Domains

Trade Customs Enforcement National Security Consumer Protection

De Minimis Reform (Sections 2-13)

Identified Gains
Contextual inference, no direct clause citation
  • U.S. domestic manufacturers
  • U.S. workers in trade-remedy protected industries
  • Customs and Border Protection
  • Intellectual property rights holders
Model: N/A | Version: bill_summary_v2 | Source: is

Contextual inference, no direct clause citation

Identified Costs
Contextual inference, no direct clause citation
  • Foreign e-commerce platforms (Shein, Temu)
  • Chinese exporters using de minimis
  • Express consignment carriers
  • U.S. consumers of low-cost imported goods
Model: N/A | Version: bill_summary_v2 | Source: is

Contextual inference, no direct clause citation

Legislative Progress

Introduced
Introduced Committee Passed
Nov 14, 2024

Mr. Wyden (for himself, Ms. Lummis, Mr. Brown, Ms. Collins, …

Stakeholder Effects

cui bono?

How this legislation distributes effects. Mention counts reflect frequency, not effect magnitude.

Government
8 mentions across 6 clauses
+3 positive -5 negative

Congress (oversight function), Customs and Border Protection, Partner government agencies (FDA, CPSC, EPA)

Customs and Border Protection faces effects in multiple directions

Positive-direction: Congress (oversight function), U.S. Customs and Border Protection (revenue)

Negative-direction: Partner government agencies (FDA, CPSC, EPA), Treasury Department, Treasury Department and CBP

Trade
8 mentions across 7 clauses
-8 negative

Chinese exporters of goods subject to Section 301 tariffs, Counterfeit goods importers, Foreign shippers using de minimis exemption

Retail
4 mentions across 4 clauses
-4 negative

E-commerce marketplaces and platforms, E-commerce platforms facilitating de minimis imports, Foreign direct-to-consumer e-commerce platforms

Multiple Industries
2 mentions across 2 clauses
?2 uncertain

All affected parties, N/A - Short title only

Transportation
2 mentions across 2 clauses
-2 negative

Carriers of forfeited merchandise, Express consignment carriers (FedEx, UPS, DHL)

Manufacturing
2 mentions across 2 clauses
+2 positive

Intellectual property rights holders, U.S. domestic industries protected by trade remedies

Households
2 mentions across 2 clauses
-2 negative

U.S. consumers of low-cost imported goods

Illicit Trade
1 mention across 1 clause
-1 negative

Drug smugglers using de minimis shipments

13/13
sections analyzed
Full impact breakdown

Bill Structure & Actor Mappings

Who is "The Secretary" in each section?

Domains
Trade Customs Enforcement
Actor Mappings
"cbp"
→ U.S. Customs and Border Protection
"the_secretary"
→ Secretary of the Treasury

Key Definitions

Terms defined in this bill

2 terms
"de minimis exemption" §2

Administrative exemption from duties under section 321 of the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U.S.C. 1321) for low-value imports

"articles ineligible for de minimis" §5(b)(1)(B)

Articles of a type or class subject to significant import increases or persistent evidence of illicit goods, fraud, counterfeiting, or other malfeasance

We use a combination of our own taxonomy and classification in addition to large language models to assess meaning and potential beneficiaries. High confidence means strong textual evidence. Always verify with the original bill text.

Learn more about our methodology