S4610-119

Reported

Pacific POWER Act

119th Congress Introduced May 20, 2026

Summary

What This Bill Does

The Pacific POWER Act directs the Secretary of State, consulting Energy, to advance geothermal deployment through bilateral and multilateral diplomacy. Work must cover deployment goals, research, exploration-risk and financing tools, regulatory and grid reforms, and technical, environmental, safety, data, and community practices, including Indigenous free, prior, and informed consent, local revenue sharing, reservoir and seismic management, and water protection. Priority engagement includes Taiwan, the Philippines, Japan, Australia, Indonesia, India, New Zealand, Papua New Guinea, and Thailand, using the Quad, trilateral dialogues, ASEAN engagements, the Pacific Community, IEA, and G7. Within 180 days, State and Energy must report on global resources, strategic locations, development barriers, and foreign-country-of-concern influence over geothermal sectors, financing, supply chains, infrastructure, and related critical minerals. Within one year they must establish an International Geothermal Program using public-private partnerships for exploration, technology, direct use, research, planning, workforce, supply chains, permitting, finance, community engagement, and U.S. exports. State must simultaneously select at least five willing partners, including three Indo-Pacific countries, one without commercial-scale geothermal use, and one with strong expansion potential, and pursue agreements. An advisory mechanism represents U.S. developers, manufacturers, finance, industry associations, and nonprofits. A partner strategy is due within 180 days after program and partner selection; State then reports on activities, agreements, personnel, and assistance and briefs Congress at least twice yearly. State may coordinate grants, loans, guarantees, feasibility studies, and other assistance through existing federal finance agencies. Unlike the introduced text, the reported bill contains no authorization of new appropriations for fiscal years 2027-2031 and no special interagency fund-transfer authority.

Who Benefits and How

Selected partner governments gain coordinated resource mapping, technical planning, public-private projects, workforce and supply-chain support, risk-sharing, permitting advice, and access to existing U.S. development and export-finance tools. Indo-Pacific partners may reduce exposure to coercive or blockadable energy supplies. U.S. geothermal developers, equipment manufacturers, finance institutions, laboratories, universities, and technical organizations gain overseas research, project, and export opportunities. Indigenous Peoples and project-area communities gain explicit consent, engagement, revenue-sharing, seismic, reservoir, water, and data safeguards.

Who Bears the Burden and How

State and Energy must conduct diplomacy, map resources, evaluate foreign influence, create the program, select partners, negotiate agreements, convene advisers, prepare country strategies and reports, coordinate finance agencies, and brief Congress. Participating laboratories, agencies, and finance institutions must supply expertise and evaluate projects under existing eligibility rules. Partner governments and developers may need regulatory, market, permitting, data-security, community-consent, revenue-sharing, seismic-monitoring, and water-protection reforms. Countries not selected receive no guaranteed support, and program implementers have no dedicated new appropriation or transfer authority in the reported bill.

Key Provisions

  • Requires bilateral and multilateral geothermal diplomacy with environmental, safety, data, and community safeguards.
  • Expands priority engagement to Thailand and United States-ASEAN energy forums.
  • Requires a 180-day global-resource and foreign-influence assessment.
  • Requires an International Geothermal Program and at least five qualifying partner countries within one year.
  • Creates public-private project activities and a United States industry advisory mechanism.
  • Requires partner strategies, recurring implementation reports, and at least two congressional briefings per year.
  • Authorizes coordination of existing grants, loans, guarantees, and finance tools without new bill-specific appropriations.

Evidence Chain:

This summary is generated from the full bill text using AI analysis. Expand "Detailed Analysis" below for identified beneficiaries/burden bearers with clause-level evidence links.

At a Glance

What This Bill Does

Establishes a U.S. international geothermal diplomacy and partnership program focused on Indo-Pacific energy security, U.S. technology exports, project safeguards, and competition with foreign countries of concern.

Key Policy Areas

Geothermal Energy, Indo-Pacific Policy, Energy Exports

Primary Purpose

Establishes a U.S. international geothermal diplomacy and partnership program focused on Indo-Pacific energy security, U.S. technology exports, project safeguards, and competition with foreign countries of concern.

Policy Domains

Geothermal Energy Indo-Pacific Policy Energy Exports

Pacific POWER Act

Identified Gains
  • Selected geothermal partner governments
  • United States geothermal developers
  • Geothermal equipment manufacturers
  • National Laboratory research programs
  • Indigenous communities near projects
  • Partner-country energy consumers
Model: codex-gpt-5 | Version: bill_summary_v2 | Source: rs
Partner-country energy consumers: , ,
Geothermal equipment manufacturers: , ,
United States geothermal developers: , ,
Indigenous communities near projects: , ,
National Laboratory research programs: , ,
Selected geothermal partner governments: , ,
Identified Costs
  • State Department geothermal staff
  • Department of Energy international-program staff
  • Federal development-finance agencies
  • Partner government agencies
  • Geothermal project developers
  • Congressional foreign-affairs committees
Model: codex-gpt-5 | Version: bill_summary_v2 | Source: rs
Partner government agencies: , ,
Geothermal project developers: , ,
State Department geothermal staff: , ,
Federal development-finance agencies: , ,
Congressional foreign-affairs committees: , ,
Department of Energy international-program staff: , ,

Legislative Progress

Reported
Introduced Committee Passed
Jul 27, 2026

Placed on Senate Legislative Calendar under General Orders. Calendar No. …

Jul 27, 2026

Committee on Foreign Relations. Reported by Senator Risch with an …

Jun 17, 2026

Committee on Foreign Relations. Ordered to be reported with an …

May 20, 2026

Read twice and referred to the Committee on Foreign Relations.

May 20, 2026

Introduced in Senate

May 20, 2026

Mr. Schatz (for himself, Mr. McCormick, Mr. Curtis, and Mr. …

May 20, 2026

Mr. Schatz (for himself, Mr. McCormick, Mr. Curtis, Mr. Coons, …

Stakeholder Effects

cui bono?

How this legislation distributes effects. Mention counts reflect frequency, not effect magnitude.

Government
36 mentions across 12 clauses
+13 positive -16 negative ?7 uncertain

Association of Southeast Asian Nations partners, Congressional appropriations committees, Congressional energy and foreign-affairs committees

State Department program staff faces effects in multiple directions

Positive-direction: Association of Southeast Asian Nations partners, Congressional appropriations committees, Congressional energy and foreign-affairs committees, Congressional foreign-affairs committees, Eligible geothermal partner governments, Indo-Pacific geothermal partner governments, National Laboratory geothermal programs, Selected geothermal partner governments, Thailand energy agencies

Negative-direction: Department of Energy international-program staff, Department of Energy resource analysts, Federal development-finance programs, Federal geothermal agencies, Federal geothermal coordination staff, Foreign countries of concern, Partner government agencies seeking assistance, Partner government program staff, State Department foreign-influence analysts, State Department geothermal staff, State Department partner-selection staff

Energy
15 mentions across 10 clauses
+11 positive -2 negative ?2 uncertain

Geothermal direct-use operators, Geothermal project developers, Next-generation geothermal developers

Positive-direction: Geothermal direct-use operators, Next-generation geothermal developers, United States geothermal companies, United States geothermal developers, United States geothermal equipment manufacturers, United States geothermal manufacturers

Negative-direction: Geothermal project developers, Partner-country geothermal suppliers

General Public
5 mentions across 4 clauses
+4 positive -1 negative

Indigenous communities near geothermal projects, Residents exposed to geothermal project risks, Taxpayers

Taxpayers faces effects in multiple directions

Education
1 mention across 1 clause
+1 positive

University geothermal researchers

Professional Services
1 mention across 1 clause
?1 uncertain

Legislative compliance counsel

6/13
sections analyzed
Full impact breakdown

Bill Structure & Actor Mappings

Who is "The Secretary" in each section?

Domains
Geothermal Energy Indo-Pacific Policy Energy Exports
Actor Mappings
"program_lead"
→ Secretary of State
"private_partners"
→ U.S. geothermal developers, manufacturers, and financial institutions
"priority_partners"
→ Indo-Pacific allied and partner governments
"research_partners"
→ Department of Energy National Laboratories and universities
"technical_partner"
→ Secretary of Energy
"affected_communities"
→ Indigenous Peoples and communities near geothermal projects

We use a combination of our own taxonomy and classification in addition to large language models to assess meaning and potential beneficiaries. High confidence means strong textual evidence. Always verify with the original bill text.

Learn more about our methodology