S394-119

Introduced

To provide for the regulation of payment stablecoins, and for other purposes.

119th Congress Introduced Feb 4, 2025

Analysis under review: This bill has generated analysis that may be too generic or incomplete. Clause-level evidence remains available below.

Summary

What This Bill Does

The GENIUS Act creates the first comprehensive federal regulatory framework for payment stablecoins - digital currencies designed to maintain a stable value pegged to the US dollar. It requires all stablecoin issuers to obtain federal or state approval, maintain 1-to-1 reserve backing with safe assets like Treasury bills, and comply with anti-money laundering rules.

Who Benefits and How

Cryptocurrency companies and stablecoin issuers gain regulatory clarity and a legal pathway to operate in the US, as payment stablecoins are explicitly exempted from securities laws. Traditional banks benefit from rules protecting their custody activities from burdensome capital requirements. Large stablecoin issuers (over $10 billion) must register federally, creating barriers that may advantage established players.

Who Bears the Burden and How

Smaller cryptocurrency startups face significant compliance costs including reserve requirements, monthly audits, and licensing fees. The SEC loses jurisdiction over stablecoins, reducing its oversight authority. Unauthorized issuers face penalties of $100,000 per day for non-compliance.

Key Provisions

  • Requires 1-to-1 reserve backing with Treasury bills, cash, or other safe assets
  • Creates federal licensing pathway through OCC and state-level alternatives for smaller issuers
  • Explicitly exempts payment stablecoins from securities laws (SEC jurisdiction)
  • Gives stablecoin holders priority claims in bankruptcy over other creditors
  • Mandates monthly audits and CEO/CFO certifications of reserve reports

Evidence Chain:

This summary is generated from the full bill text using AI analysis. Expand "Detailed Analysis" below for identified beneficiaries/burden bearers.

At a Glance

What This Bill Does

Establishes a comprehensive federal regulatory framework for payment stablecoins, creating licensing requirements for issuers, mandating reserve backing, and explicitly exempting compliant stablecoins from securities laws.

Key Policy Areas

Financial Services, Banking Regulation, Digital Assets, Consumer Protection

Primary Purpose

Establishes a comprehensive federal regulatory framework for payment stablecoins, creating licensing requirements for issuers, mandating reserve backing, and explicitly exempting compliant stablecoins from securities laws.

Policy Domains

Financial Services Banking Regulation Digital Assets Consumer Protection

Section 2 - Definitions

Identified Gains
Contextual inference, no direct clause citation
  • Asset-backed stablecoin issuers
Model: N/A | Version: bill_summary_v2 | Source: is

Contextual inference, no direct clause citation

Identified Costs
Contextual inference, no direct clause citation
  • Algorithmic stablecoin projects
Model: N/A | Version: bill_summary_v2 | Source: is

Contextual inference, no direct clause citation

Section 6-7 - Supervision and Enforcement

Identified Gains
Contextual inference, no direct clause citation
  • Large established stablecoin issuers
  • State banking regulators
Model: N/A | Version: bill_summary_v2 | Source: is

Contextual inference, no direct clause citation

Identified Costs
Contextual inference, no direct clause citation
  • Non-compliant issuers
  • Institution-affiliated parties of violators
Model: N/A | Version: bill_summary_v2 | Source: is

Contextual inference, no direct clause citation

Section 4 - Requirements for Issuing Payment Stablecoins

Identified Gains
Contextual inference, no direct clause citation
  • Stablecoin issuers
  • Cryptocurrency companies
  • Banks with digital asset custody services
  • Treasury securities market
Model: N/A | Version: bill_summary_v2 | Source: is

Contextual inference, no direct clause citation

Identified Costs
Contextual inference, no direct clause citation
  • Securities and Exchange Commission
  • Unauthorized stablecoin issuers
  • Small cryptocurrency startups
Model: N/A | Version: bill_summary_v2 | Source: is

Contextual inference, no direct clause citation

Legislative Progress

Introduced
Introduced Committee Passed
Feb 4, 2025

Mr. Hagerty (for himself, Mr. Scott of South Carolina, Mrs. …

Stakeholder Effects

cui bono?

How this legislation distributes effects. Mention counts reflect frequency, not effect magnitude.

Cryptocurrency
20 mentions across 12 clauses
+8 positive -9 negative ?3 uncertain

Algorithmic stablecoin projects, Cryptocurrency and stablecoin companies, Cryptocurrency custodians

Stablecoin issuers faces effects in multiple directions

Positive-direction: Cryptocurrency exchanges, Established cryptocurrency companies, Existing stablecoin issuers, Foreign stablecoin issuers in compliant jurisdictions, Small and mid-size stablecoin issuers, US stablecoin issuers seeking international operations

Negative-direction: Cryptocurrency custodians, Large stablecoin issuers over $10B, Non-bank cryptocurrency custodians, Officers and directors of stablecoin issuers, Permitted payment stablecoin issuers, Small stablecoin startups, Unauthorized stablecoin issuers, Unregulated crypto custody providers

Government
14 mentions across 11 clauses
-12 negative ?2 uncertain

Department of the Treasury, Federal Reserve Board, Federal Reserve System

Financial Services
4 mentions across 3 clauses
+3 positive -1 negative

Banks and credit unions offering digital asset custody, Treasury securities market, Trust companies

Positive-direction: Banks and credit unions offering digital asset custody, Treasury securities market, Trust companies

Negative-direction: Unsecured creditors of stablecoin issuers

Consumers
3 mentions across 3 clauses
+3 positive

Stablecoin holders

Professional Services
2 mentions across 2 clauses
+1 positive -1 negative

Public accounting firms, Securities lawyers and compliance firms

Positive-direction: Public accounting firms

Negative-direction: Securities lawyers and compliance firms

State & Local Government
1 mention across 1 clause
+1 positive

State banking regulators

Computer Hardware
1 mention across 1 clause
?1 uncertain

Hardware wallet manufacturers

15/16
sections analyzed
Full impact breakdown

Bill Structure & Actor Mappings

Who is "The Secretary" in each section?

Domains
Financial Services Digital Assets
Actor Mappings
"the_board"
→ Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System
"the_comptroller"
→ Comptroller of the Currency
"the_corporation"
→ Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation
Domains
Banking Regulation Financial Services
Actor Mappings
"the_secretary"
→ Secretary of the Treasury
"primary_federal_regulator"
→ OCC, FDIC, Fed, or NCUA depending on issuer type
Domains
Banking Regulation
Actor Mappings
"the_board"
→ Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System
"the_comptroller"
→ Comptroller of the Currency

Note: Primary Federal payment stablecoin regulator varies by entity type: OCC for Federal qualified nonbanks, appropriate Federal banking agency for depository institution subsidiaries, NCUA for credit union subsidiaries.

Key Definitions

Terms defined in this bill

4 terms
"payment stablecoin" §2

A digital asset designed for payment/settlement that the issuer is obligated to redeem for a fixed amount of monetary value and maintains stable value relative to that fixed amount; excludes national currencies and registered investment company securities.

"permitted payment stablecoin issuer" §2b

A subsidiary of an insured depository institution approved under section 5, a Federal qualified nonbank payment stablecoin issuer approved under section 5, or a State qualified payment stablecoin issuer.

"digital asset" §2c

Any digital representation of value which is recorded on a cryptographically-secured distributed ledger.

"Federal qualified nonbank payment stablecoin issuer" §2d

A nonbank entity approved by the primary Federal payment stablecoin regulator, pursuant to section 5, to issue payment stablecoins.

We use a combination of our own taxonomy and classification in addition to large language models to assess meaning and potential beneficiaries. High confidence means strong textual evidence. Always verify with the original bill text.

Learn more about our methodology