S3293-119

In Committee

Energy and Water Development and Related Agencies Appropriations Act, 2026

119th Congress Introduced Dec 1, 2025

Analysis under review: This bill has generated analysis that may be too generic or incomplete. Clause-level evidence remains available below.

Summary

What This Bill Does

This is the fiscal year 2026 appropriations bill for energy and water development agencies, providing funding to the Department of Energy, Army Corps of Engineers, Bureau of Reclamation, and Nuclear Regulatory Commission. The bill establishes spending levels, sets oversight requirements for agency spending, and makes significant policy changes including redirecting $2.4 billion from carbon capture programs to nuclear energy projects and authorizing new federal consolidated storage facilities for spent nuclear fuel.

Who Benefits and How

Nuclear energy industry receives the largest benefits, with $2.4 billion redirected from carbon capture programs to fund advanced reactor demonstrations (like TerraPower and X-energy), commercial nuclear deployment, and advanced nuclear fuel manufacturing. The bill also authorizes new consolidated interim storage for spent nuclear fuel, reducing costs for nuclear plant operators with stranded waste.

Transformer and electrical grid component manufacturers benefit from $75 million transferred to support domestic manufacturing of power transformers and grid components, addressing current supply chain shortages.

Western Area Power Administration customers benefit from a provision preventing funds from being transferred to the Treasury, keeping electricity rates lower for customers in Western states.

North Dakota water users receive an additional $50 million authorization for Garrison Diversion water projects with inflation indexing.

Non-federal sponsors of major flood projects can receive advance federal payments to complete flood risk management projects exceeding $700 million.

DOE grant recipients gain new protections requiring 120-day notice and 90-day restructuring period before any award termination.

Who Bears the Burden and How

Carbon capture and CO2 transportation projects lose $1.5 billion in previously appropriated IIJA funding, which is redirected to nuclear energy.

Hydrogen hub demonstration projects lose $75 million to grid deployment programs.

Defense Nuclear Nonproliferation programs face a $39 million permanent rescission from unobligated balances.

Federal agencies (Corps, Reclamation, DOE, NRC) face increased compliance burdens with extensive Congressional notification requirements for reprogramming funds, making grants, and award decisions.

San Luis Unit agricultural water users in California must fully reimburse the federal government for drainage service costs.

Key Provisions

  • $2.4B Nuclear Energy Boost: Redirects funds from CO2 transportation ($1.5B) and consolidates nuclear energy funds ($900M) for advanced reactor demonstrations, commercial deployment, and advanced nuclear fuel programs

  • Spent Nuclear Fuel Storage: Authorizes DOE to establish consolidated interim storage facilities for spent nuclear fuel using consent-based siting, with priority for sites without operating reactors

  • Grid Infrastructure: Transfers $75M for domestic manufacturing of power transformers and grid components to address supply chain shortages

  • Congressional Oversight: Requires 3-day advance notice for DOE grants over $1M, 30-day notice for creating or eliminating programs, and extensive reporting requirements

  • Award Termination Protection: Requires 120-day notice and 90-day restructuring opportunity before DOE can terminate discretionary awards

  • Lake Erie Dredging: Prohibits open lake placement of dredged material unless approved under state water quality certification

Evidence Chain:

This summary is generated from the full bill text using AI analysis. Expand "Detailed Analysis" below for identified beneficiaries/burden bearers.

At a Glance

What This Bill Does

Appropriates funds for energy and water development and related agencies for fiscal year 2026, including the Department of Energy, Army Corps of Engineers, Bureau of Reclamation, and Nuclear Regulatory Commission.

Who Benefits

  • Nuclear energy industry (major funding redirects and new programs)
  • Army Corps of Engineers contractors
  • Bureau of Reclamation water project beneficiaries

Who Bears Costs

  • Carbon Dioxide Transportation Infrastructure Finance Program (loses .5B in funding)
  • Defense Nuclear Nonproliferation programs (M rescission)
  • Clean Energy Demonstrations Office (loses M to nuclear)

Key Policy Areas

Energy, Water Resources, Nuclear Energy, Defense, Environment

Primary Purpose

Appropriates funds for energy and water development and related agencies for fiscal year 2026, including the Department of Energy, Army Corps of Engineers, Bureau of Reclamation, and Nuclear Regulatory Commission.

Policy Domains

Energy Water Resources Nuclear Energy Defense Environment

Legislative Strategy

"Standard appropriations bill with significant emphasis on nuclear energy and infrastructure, including major reprogramming of IIJA funds toward nuclear projects and establishment of consolidated interim storage for nuclear waste."

Identified Gains

  • Nuclear energy industry (major funding redirects and new programs)
  • Army Corps of Engineers contractors
  • Bureau of Reclamation water project beneficiaries
  • National Nuclear Security Administration
  • DOE National Laboratories
  • Small businesses (SBIR/STTR allocations)
  • Navajo-Gallup Water Supply Project (increased authorization)
  • Fort Peck Reservation Rural Water System

Identified Costs

  • Carbon Dioxide Transportation Infrastructure Finance Program (loses .5B in funding)
  • Defense Nuclear Nonproliferation programs (M rescission)
  • Clean Energy Demonstrations Office (loses M to nuclear)
  • Environmental regulators (increased nuclear waste storage authority)
  • Taxpayers (substantial appropriations)

Legislative Progress

In Committee
Introduced Committee Passed
Dec 1, 2025

Mr. Kennedy introduced the following bill; which was read twice …

Dec 1, 2025

Read twice and referred to the Committee on Appropriations.

Dec 1, 2025

Introduced in Senate

Stakeholder Effects

cui bono?

How this legislation distributes effects. Mention counts reflect frequency, not effect magnitude.

Government
16 mentions across 16 clauses
+4 positive -11 negative ?1 uncertain

Aging Infrastructure Program, All agencies, Army Corps of Engineers

Army Corps of Engineers faces effects in multiple directions

Positive-direction: Aging Infrastructure Program, Department of Energy, Army Corps of Engineers, Bureau of Reclamation, Fish and Wildlife Service

Negative-direction: All agencies, Bureau of Reclamation, Corps dredging operations, Department of Energy, Federal agencies, NNSA Defense Nuclear Nonproliferation, Nuclear Regulatory Commission

Construction
3 mentions across 3 clauses
-2 negative ?1 uncertain

Corps construction contractors, Corps project applicants, DOE major construction contractors

Energy
3 mentions across 3 clauses
+1 positive -2 negative

DOE discretionary award recipients, DOE large grant recipients, Hydrogen hub projects

Positive-direction: DOE discretionary award recipients

Negative-direction: DOE large grant recipients, Hydrogen hub projects

Nuclear Energy
3 mentions across 3 clauses
+2 positive -1 negative

Advanced reactor demonstration projects, Nuclear facility contractors, Nuclear power plant operators

Positive-direction: Advanced reactor demonstration projects, Nuclear power plant operators

Negative-direction: Nuclear facility contractors

Utilities
2 mentions across 2 clauses
+1 positive -1 negative

New water storage projects, North Dakota water users

Positive-direction: North Dakota water users

Negative-direction: New water storage projects

Small Business
1 mention across 1 clause
+1 positive

Small businesses in SBIR/STTR

Federal Power Marketing
1 mention across 1 clause
+1 positive

Western Area Power Administration

Research & Science
1 mention across 1 clause
-1 negative

DOE National Laboratories

33/42
sections analyzed
Full impact breakdown

Bill Structure & Actor Mappings

Who is "The Secretary" in each section?

Domains
Water Resources Flood Control Navigation
Actor Mappings
"the_secretary"
→ Secretary of the Army
"chief_of_engineers"
→ Chief of Engineers, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
Domains
Water Resources Reclamation Environment
Actor Mappings
"the_secretary"
→ Secretary of the Interior
"the_administrator"
→ Administrator of the Environmental Protection Agency
Domains
Energy Nuclear Energy Defense Science
Actor Mappings
"the_secretary"
→ Secretary of Energy
Domains
Nuclear Regulation
Actor Mappings
"the_commission"
→ Nuclear Regulatory Commission
Domains
Government Operations

Note: 'The Secretary' refers to Secretary of the Army in Title I (Corps of Engineers), Secretary of the Interior in Title II (Bureau of Reclamation), and Secretary of Energy in Title III.

Key Definitions

Terms defined in this bill

4 terms
"affected Indian tribe" §310(a)(1)

Has the meaning given in section 2 of the Nuclear Waste Policy Act of 1982 (42 U.S.C. 10101)

"high-level radioactive waste" §310(a)(2)

Has the meaning given in section 2 of the Nuclear Waste Policy Act of 1982 (42 U.S.C. 10101)

"Nuclear Waste Fund" §310(a)(3)

The Nuclear Waste Fund established under section 302(c) of the Nuclear Waste Policy Act of 1982 (42 U.S.C. 10222(c))

"spent nuclear fuel" §310(a)(4)

Has the meaning given in section 2 of the Nuclear Waste Policy Act of 1982 (42 U.S.C. 10101)

We use a combination of our own taxonomy and classification in addition to large language models to assess meaning and potential beneficiaries. High confidence means strong textual evidence. Always verify with the original bill text.

Learn more about our methodology