A bill to require the Director of National Intelligence to develop a strategy on intelligence coordination and sharing relating to critical and emerging technologies.
Analysis under review: This bill has generated analysis that may be too generic or incomplete. Clause-level evidence remains available below.
Summary
What This Bill Does
This bill requires the Director of National Intelligence (DNI) to develop a strategy within 60 days for coordinating intelligence activities related to critical and emerging technologies. The strategy must address how the intelligence community collects, processes, analyzes, and disseminates foreign intelligence on these technologies, and how that intelligence is shared with other federal agencies.
Who Benefits and How
Federal agencies with responsibilities for technology regulation, innovation, research, science, public health, export controls, and financial oversight benefit by gaining improved access to intelligence on critical and emerging technologies. The intelligence community benefits from clearer coordination guidelines. Congressional intelligence committees gain oversight through required strategy submission within 90 days.
Who Bears the Burden and How
The Office of the Director of National Intelligence faces the administrative burden of developing and implementing the strategy within tight timelines. Intelligence community agencies must adapt their operations to comply with new coordination requirements. No private sector entities face direct compliance burdens.
Key Provisions
- DNI must develop a technology intelligence coordination strategy within 60 days of enactment
- Strategy must cover foreign intelligence collection, processing, analysis, and dissemination on critical/emerging tech
- Intelligence must be shared with agencies responsible for regulation, research, export controls, and financial tools
- Strategy must be submitted to congressional intelligence committees within 30 days of completion
Evidence Chain:
This summary is generated from the full bill text using AI analysis. Expand "Detailed Analysis" below for identified beneficiaries/burden bearers.
At a Glance
What This Bill Does
Requires the Director of National Intelligence to develop a strategy for coordinating intelligence collection, analysis, and sharing regarding critical and emerging technologies across the intelligence community and with other federal agencies.
Who Benefits
- Federal agencies with technology policy responsibilities
- Congressional intelligence committees
- Intelligence community (through clearer coordination)
Who Bears Costs
- Office of the Director of National Intelligence
- Intelligence community agencies
Key Policy Areas
National Security, Intelligence, Technology Policy, Government Administration
Primary Purpose
Requires the Director of National Intelligence to develop a strategy for coordinating intelligence collection, analysis, and sharing regarding critical and emerging technologies across the intelligence community and with other federal agencies.
Policy Domains
Legislative Strategy
"Improve interagency coordination on foreign intelligence related to critical and emerging technologies to enhance national security decision-making"
Sponsors
Legislative Progress
In CommitteeMr. Young introduced the following bill; which was read twice …
Read twice and referred to the Select Committee on Intelligence.
Introduced in Senate
Stakeholder Effects
cui bono?How this legislation distributes effects. Mention counts reflect frequency, not effect magnitude.
Congressional intelligence committees, Federal agencies with technology policy responsibilities (Commerce, USTR, Treasury), Intelligence community agencies (CIA, NSA, DIA, etc.)
Positive-direction: Congressional intelligence committees, Federal agencies with technology policy responsibilities (Commerce, USTR, Treasury)
Negative-direction: Intelligence community agencies (CIA, NSA, DIA, etc.), Office of the Director of National Intelligence
Bill Structure & Actor Mappings
Who is "The Secretary" in each section?
- "the_director"
- → Director of National Intelligence
Key Definitions
Terms defined in this bill
Has the meaning given in section 3 of the National Security Act of 1947 (50 U.S.C. 3003)
We use a combination of our own taxonomy and classification in addition to large language models to assess meaning and potential beneficiaries. High confidence means strong textual evidence. Always verify with the original bill text.
Learn more about our methodology