A bill to require the Director of National Intelligence to develop a strategy on intelligence coordination and sharing relating to critical and emerging technologies.
Analysis under review: This bill has generated analysis that may be too generic or incomplete. Clause-level evidence remains available below.
Summary
What This Bill Does
The bill requires the Director of National Intelligence to develop a strategy within 60 days for coordinating intelligence collection, processing, analysis, and dissemination on critical and emerging technologies across. It relies on reporting requirements. The main policy areas are National Security.
Who Benefits and How
Congressional intelligence committees would be affected and Federal agencies with technology policy responsibilities (Commerce, USTR, Treasury) could gain revenue opportunities.
Who Bears the Burden and How
Office of the Director of National Intelligence would take on compliance duties and Intelligence community agencies (CIA, NSA, DIA, etc.) would take on compliance duties.
Key Provisions
- Requires the Director of National Intelligence to develop a strategy within 60 days for coordinating intelligence collection, processing, analysis, and dissemination on critical and emerging technologies across...
Evidence Chain:
This summary is generated from the full bill text using AI analysis. Expand "Detailed Analysis" below for identified beneficiaries/burden bearers with clause-level evidence links.
At a Glance
What This Bill Does
The bill requires the Director of National Intelligence to develop a strategy within 60 days for coordinating intelligence collection, processing, analysis, and dissemination on critical and emerging technologies across.
Key Policy Areas
National Security
Primary Purpose
The bill requires the Director of National Intelligence to develop a strategy within 60 days for coordinating intelligence collection, processing, analysis, and dissemination on critical and emerging technologies across.
Policy Domains
Section 1 - Strategy on Intelligence Coordination
Identified Gains
- Congressional intelligence committees
- Federal agencies with technology policy responsibilities (Commerce, USTR, Treasury)
Identified Costs
- Office of the Director of National Intelligence
- Intelligence community agencies (CIA, NSA, DIA, etc.)
Sponsors
Legislative Progress
In CommitteeMr. Young introduced the following bill; which was read twice …
Read twice and referred to the Select Committee on Intelligence.
Introduced in Senate
Stakeholder Effects
cui bono?How this legislation distributes effects. Mention counts reflect frequency, not effect magnitude.
Congressional intelligence committees, Federal agencies with technology policy responsibilities (Commerce, USTR, Treasury), Intelligence community agencies (CIA, NSA, DIA, etc.)
Positive-direction: Congressional intelligence committees, Federal agencies with technology policy responsibilities (Commerce, USTR, Treasury)
Negative-direction: Intelligence community agencies (CIA, NSA, DIA, etc.), Office of the Director of National Intelligence
Bill Structure & Actor Mappings
Who is "The Secretary" in each section?
- "the_director"
- → Director of National Intelligence
Key Definitions
Terms defined in this bill
Has the meaning given in section 3 of the National Security Act of 1947 (50 U.S.C. 3003)
We use a combination of our own taxonomy and classification in addition to large language models to assess meaning and potential beneficiaries. High confidence means strong textual evidence. Always verify with the original bill text.
Learn more about our methodology