S2925-119

Introduced

To direct the Federal Trade Commission to conduct a study on the governance of neural data and other related data, and for other purposes.

119th Congress Introduced Sep 29, 2025

Analysis under review: This bill has generated analysis that may be too generic or incomplete. Clause-level evidence remains available below.

Summary

What This Bill Does

The bill creates expresses the sense of Congress that neural data can be monetized and used to shape behavior in ways existing laws do not adequately address, that vertical corporate integration of neurotechnology and AI creates, defines key terms including neural data (information from measuring nervous system activity), neurotechnology (devices/systems that access or alter the nervous system), other related data (biometric/behavioral data that, and directs the FTC to conduct a comprehensive study on neural data governance covering regulatory gaps, privacy best practices, consumer transparency, consent frameworks, enforcement mechanisms, cybersecurity risks. It relies on definition changes, reporting requirements, appropriations, and procurement rules. The main policy areas are Technology, Privacy and Data Protection, and Education.

Who Benefits and How

General public (privacy protection from government surveillance) could face reduced risk, Consumer advocacy and civil liberties organizations could face fewer barriers, and Compliant neurotechnology vendors meeting ethical standards could gain revenue opportunities.

Who Bears the Burden and How

Federal agencies procuring neurotechnology would take on compliance duties, Federal Trade Commission would take on compliance duties, and Neurotechnology vendors to federal government could face higher barriers.

Key Provisions

  • Creates expresses the sense of Congress that neural data can be monetized and used to shape behavior in ways existing laws do not adequately address, that vertical corporate integration of neurotechnology and AI creates...
  • Defines key terms including neural data (information from measuring nervous system activity), neurotechnology (devices/systems that access or alter the nervous system), other related data (biometric/behavioral data that...
  • Directs the FTC to conduct a comprehensive study on neural data governance covering regulatory gaps, privacy best practices, consumer transparency, consent frameworks, enforcement mechanisms, cybersecurity risks...
  • Requires OSTP to develop guidance on federal agency procurement and use of neurotechnology within 180 days of the FTC report.

Evidence Chain:

This summary is generated from the full bill text using AI analysis. Expand "Detailed Analysis" below for identified beneficiaries/burden bearers with clause-level evidence links.

At a Glance

What This Bill Does

The bill creates expresses the sense of Congress that neural data can be monetized and used to shape behavior in ways existing laws do not adequately address, that vertical corporate integration of neurotechnology and AI creates, defines key terms including neural data (information from measuring nervous system activity), neurotechnology (devices/systems that access or alter the nervous system), other related data (biometric/behavioral data that, and directs the FTC to conduct a comprehensive study on neural data governance covering regulatory gaps, privacy best practices, consumer transparency, consent frameworks, enforcement mechanisms, cybersecurity risks.

Key Policy Areas

Technology, Privacy and Data Protection, Education

Primary Purpose

The bill creates expresses the sense of Congress that neural data can be monetized and used to shape behavior in ways existing laws do not adequately address, that vertical corporate integration of neurotechnology and AI creates, defines key terms including neural data (information from measuring nervous system activity), neurotechnology (devices/systems that access or alter the nervous system), other related data (biometric/behavioral data that, and directs the FTC to conduct a comprehensive study on neural data governance covering regulatory gaps, privacy best practices, consumer transparency, consent frameworks, enforcement mechanisms, cybersecurity risks.

Policy Domains

Technology Privacy and Data Protection Education

Neural Data Governance Study and Federal Procurement Restrictions

Identified Gains
  • General public (privacy protection from government surveillance)
  • Consumer advocacy and civil liberties organizations
  • Compliant neurotechnology vendors meeting ethical standards
  • Responsible neurotechnology innovators (ethical companies)
Model: codex-gpt-5:bulk-repair | Version: bill_summary_v2 | Source: is
Consumer advocacy and civil liberties organizations:
Responsible neurotechnology innovators (ethical companies):
Compliant neurotechnology vendors meeting ethical standards:
General public (privacy protection from government surveillance):
Identified Costs
  • Federal agencies procuring neurotechnology
  • Federal Trade Commission
  • Neurotechnology vendors to federal government
  • Neurotechnology companies
  • Data brokers dealing in neural and biometric data
Model: codex-gpt-5:bulk-repair | Version: bill_summary_v2 | Source: is
Federal Trade Commission:
Neurotechnology companies:
Federal agencies procuring neurotechnology:
Neurotechnology vendors to federal government:
Data brokers dealing in neural and biometric data:

Legislative Progress

Introduced
Introduced Committee Passed
Sep 29, 2025

Mr. Schumer (for himself, Ms. Cantwell, and Mr. Markey) introduced …

Stakeholder Effects

cui bono?

How this legislation distributes effects. Mention counts reflect frequency, not effect magnitude.

Electronics Mfg & Services
5 mentions across 3 clauses
+2 positive -3 negative

Compliant neurotechnology vendors meeting ethical standards, Neurotechnology companies, Neurotechnology device manufacturers

Positive-direction: Compliant neurotechnology vendors meeting ethical standards, Responsible neurotechnology innovators (ethical companies)

Negative-direction: Neurotechnology companies, Neurotechnology device manufacturers, Neurotechnology vendors to federal government

Government
2 mentions across 2 clauses
-2 negative

Federal Trade Commission, Federal agencies procuring neurotechnology

Telecommunications
1 mention across 1 clause
-1 negative

Data brokers dealing in neural and biometric data

Non-Profit Institutions
1 mention across 1 clause
+1 positive

Consumer advocacy and civil liberties organizations

General Public
1 mention across 1 clause
+1 positive

General public (privacy protection from government surveillance)

4/5
sections analyzed
Full impact breakdown

Bill Structure & Actor Mappings

Who is "The Secretary" in each section?

Domains
Technology Privacy and Data Protection Education
Actor Mappings
"the_commission"
→ Federal Trade Commission
"the_director_omb"
→ Director of the Office of Management and Budget
"the_director_ostp"
→ Director of the Office of Science and Technology Policy

Key Definitions

Terms defined in this bill

1 term
"" §3

We use a combination of our own taxonomy and classification in addition to large language models to assess meaning and potential beneficiaries. High confidence means strong textual evidence. Always verify with the original bill text.

Learn more about our methodology