S2860-118

Reported

To create protections for financial institutions that provide financial services to State-sanctioned marijuana businesses and service providers for such businesses, and for other purposes.

118th Congress Introduced Sep 20, 2023

Analysis under review: This bill has generated analysis that may be too generic or incomplete. Clause-level evidence remains available below.

Summary

What This Bill Does

Creates safe harbor for banks, credit unions, and insurers providing services to state-legal cannabis businesses. Prevents federal regulators from penalizing institutions for serving legal cannabis industry.

Who Benefits and How

Cannabis businesses gain banking access. Financial institutions can safely serve legal cannabis. States benefit from regulated cannabis economy.

Who Bears the Burden and How

Federal prohibition remains in place. Regulators must adjust enforcement policies. Compliance requirements for financial institutions.

Key Provisions

  • Safe harbor for financial services to state-legal cannabis
  • Covers depository institutions, credit unions, and insurance
  • Includes minority depository institutions

Evidence Chain:

This summary is generated from the full bill text using AI analysis. Expand "Detailed Analysis" below for identified beneficiaries/burden bearers.

At a Glance

What This Bill Does

Protects financial institutions serving state-legal cannabis businesses from federal penalties

Who Benefits

  • Cannabis businesses
  • Financial institutions
  • State programs

Who Bears Costs

  • Federal enforcement
  • Compliance costs

Key Policy Areas

Banking, Cannabis, Financial Services

Primary Purpose

Protects financial institutions serving state-legal cannabis businesses from federal penalties

Policy Domains

Banking Cannabis Financial Services

Legislative Strategy

"Resolve banking-cannabis conflict while maintaining prohibition"

Legislative Progress

Reported
Introduced Committee Passed
Sep 28, 2023

Reported by Mr. Brown, with amendments

Sep 20, 2023

Mr. Merkley (for himself, Mr. Daines, Mr. Schumer, Ms. Sinema, …

Sep 20, 2023

Mr. Merkley (for himself, Mr. Daines, Mr. Schumer, Ms. Sinema, …

Stakeholder Effects

cui bono?

How this legislation distributes effects. Mention counts reflect frequency, not effect magnitude.

Financial Services
8 mentions across 8 clauses
+8 positive

Bank executives and employees handling cannabis accounts, Banks and credit unions serving cannabis businesses, Banks filing SARs for cannabis accounts

Federal Financial Regulators
5 mentions across 5 clauses
-5 negative

FFIEC member agencies, Federal banking regulators, Federal banking regulators (OCC, FDIC, NCUA, Fed)

Cannabis Production And Distribution
4 mentions across 4 clauses
+4 positive

Cannabis businesses seeking capital, Cannabis businesses subject to SAR requirements, Cannabis industry employees and owners seeking mortgages

Government
2 mentions across 2 clauses
-2 negative

Government Accountability Office

Business Support Services
1 mention across 1 clause
+1 positive

Service providers to cannabis businesses (landlords, accountants, lawyers)

Hemp Production
1 mention across 1 clause
+1 positive

Hemp producers and processors (THC below 0.3%)

17/18
sections analyzed
Full impact breakdown

Bill Structure & Actor Mappings

Who is "The Secretary" in each section?

Domains
Banking Cannabis

Key Definitions

Terms defined in this bill

1 term
"depository institution" §2d

banks, federal credit unions, state credit unions including MDIs

We use a combination of our own taxonomy and classification in addition to large language models to assess meaning and potential beneficiaries. High confidence means strong textual evidence. Always verify with the original bill text.

Learn more about our methodology