S2666-119

Reported

Foreign Robocall Elimination Act

119th Congress Introduced Aug 1, 2025

Summary

What This Bill Does

The bill creates a robocall task force within 270 days. The FCC chair, FTC chair, and Attorney General jointly appoint private-sector members with expertise in combating unlawful robocalls, including voice service providers, analytics providers, technologists, the Pallone-Thune TRACED Act consortium, a marketing business, a non-marketing business or nonprofit that calls consumers regularly, and a customer advocate. Federal agencies also participate when the FCC chair, in consultation with FTC and Justice, considers them appropriate.

Who Benefits and How

Consumers benefit because the task force concentrates federal and private expertise on unlawful robocall prevention and response. Voice service providers benefit from a formal role in shaping robocall mitigation recommendations. Analytics providers benefit from representation in a federal process focused on call authentication, detection, and blocking practices. Customer advocates benefit from a seat on the task force to represent people harmed by unlawful robocalls. The FCC benefits from a structured advisory forum that includes agencies, industry, technologists, and consumer advocates.

Who Bears the Burden and How

The FCC must establish and administer the task force within 270 days. The FTC and Attorney General must consult on task force formation and jointly appoint private-sector members. Federal agency representatives must participate when appointed by their agency heads. Marketing businesses that call consumers face scrutiny from a task force focused on unlawful robocalls. Private-sector task force members must contribute expertise without the bill itself creating direct regulatory relief.

Key Provisions

  • Defines unlawful robocall, Commission, Consortium, Federal agency, and task force.
  • Requires FCC creation of a task force on unlawful robocalls within 270 days after enactment.
  • Includes federal agency representatives selected through consultation among FCC, FTC, Justice, and agency heads.
  • Requires private-sector representation from voice service providers, analytics providers, technologists, the TRACED Act consortium, marketers, non-marketing callers, and customer advocates.
  • Provides an interagency forum for coordinating expertise on unlawful robocall mitigation.

Evidence Chain:

This summary is generated from the full bill text using AI analysis. Expand "Detailed Analysis" below for identified beneficiaries/burden bearers with clause-level evidence links.

At a Glance

What This Bill Does

Requires the FCC, after consulting FTC and the Attorney General, to establish an interagency and private-sector task force on unlawful robocalls with representatives from federal agencies, voice service providers, analytics providers, technologists, the TRACED Act consortium, marketing and non-marketing callers, and consumer advocates.

Key Policy Areas

Telecommunications, Consumer Protection

Primary Purpose

Requires the FCC, after consulting FTC and the Attorney General, to establish an interagency and private-sector task force on unlawful robocalls with representatives from federal agencies, voice service providers, analytics providers, technologists, the TRACED Act consortium, marketing and non-marketing callers, and consumer advocates.

Policy Domains

Telecommunications Consumer Protection

Bill provisions

Identified Gains
  • Consumers
  • Voice service providers
  • Analytics providers
  • Customer advocates
  • Federal Communications Commission
Model: codex-gpt-5 | Version: bill_summary_v2 | Source: is
Consumers:
Customer advocates:
Analytics providers:
Voice service providers:
Federal Communications Commission:
Identified Costs
  • Federal Communications Commission
  • Federal Trade Commission
  • Attorney General
  • Federal agency representatives
  • Marketing businesses
Model: codex-gpt-5 | Version: bill_summary_v2 | Source: is
Attorney General:
Marketing businesses:
Federal Trade Commission:
Federal agency representatives:
Federal Communications Commission:

Legislative Progress

Reported
Introduced Committee Passed
Jun 1, 2026

Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation. Reported by Senator Cruz …

Jun 1, 2026

Placed on Senate Legislative Calendar under General Orders. Calendar No. …

Jun 1, 2026

Reported by Mr. Cruz, with an amendment

Oct 21, 2025

Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation. Ordered to be reported …

Aug 1, 2025

Introduced in Senate

Aug 1, 2025

Mr. Budd (for himself, Mr. Welch, Mr. Husted, and Mr. …

Aug 1, 2025

Mr. Budd (for himself and Mr. Welch) introduced the following …

Aug 1, 2025

Read twice and referred to the Committee on Commerce, Science, …

Stakeholder Effects

cui bono?

How this legislation distributes effects. Mention counts reflect frequency, not effect magnitude.

Government
2 mentions across 1 clause
-2 negative

Federal Communications Commission, Federal Trade Commission

Consumers
1 mention across 1 clause
+1 positive
Telecommunications
1 mention across 1 clause
+1 positive

Voice service providers

Technology
1 mention across 1 clause
+1 positive

Analytics providers

Marketing
1 mention across 1 clause
-1 negative

Marketing businesses

1/3
sections analyzed
Full impact breakdown

Bill Structure & Actor Mappings

Who is "The Secretary" in each section?

Domains
Telecommunications Consumer Protection
Actor Mappings
"ftc"
→ Federal Trade Commission
"commission"
→ Federal Communications Commission
"attorney_general"
→ Attorney General

We use a combination of our own taxonomy and classification in addition to large language models to assess meaning and potential beneficiaries. High confidence means strong textual evidence. Always verify with the original bill text.

Learn more about our methodology