S2666-119

Passed Senate

Foreign Robocall Elimination Act

119th Congress Introduced Aug 1, 2025

Summary

What This Bill Does

The Foreign Robocall Elimination Act requires the FCC, after consulting the FTC and Attorney General, to establish an unlawful-robocall task force within 270 days. The body combines relevant federal agencies with seven private-sector representatives from voice providers, analytics and technology, the registered traceback consortium, marketing and nonmarketing callers, and a customer advocate. It must study the scale and foreign origins of unlawful calls, financial and identity losses, international authentication, STIR/SHAKEN, traceback, foreign cooperation, Justice enforcement resources and penalties, voluntary blocking practices, public disclosure tradeoffs, and TRACED Act compliance. Its report is due to Congress within 360 days after formation, and the task force terminates 90 days later. The Act changes FCC notice about the registered consortium from annual to once every three years. It immunizes the consortium from lawsuits for receiving, sharing, or publishing covered traceback information; permits the FCC or consortium to publish providers that refuse traceback participation or carry substantial unlawful traffic; and permits FCC enforcement based on that information. FCC must create a rule requiring a bond of up to $100,000 before a provider certifies in the Robocall Mitigation Database when needed to protect database integrity. Rules must exempt bona fide established providers when a bond is unnecessary, require bonds from providers lacking legitimate operations, sufficient oversight, or ability to pay penalties, and minimize burdens on compliant regulated providers.

Who Benefits and How

Consumers and businesses receiving calls may benefit from better identification, blocking, traceback, foreign cooperation, and enforcement against unlawful robocalls. Customer advocates gain a seat in the task force, while Congress and enforcement agencies gain a detailed assessment and recommendations. The registered traceback consortium gains liability protection for covered information sharing and authority, with FCC consultation, to identify nonparticipating or high-risk voice providers. Established, regulated voice providers benefit from required categorical bond exemptions and a direction to minimize unnecessary financial and administrative burdens.

Who Bears the Burden and How

FCC, FTC, Justice, and participating agencies must appoint members, support the task force, analyze extensive technical and enforcement questions, and produce the report. FCC must conduct rulemaking, evaluate bond necessity and exemptions, maintain provider accountability, and consider enforcement based on published information. Voice providers that cannot demonstrate legitimate ongoing operations, regulatory oversight, or ability to pay penalties may have to post up to $100,000 before database certification and may be publicly listed or investigated. Task-force members and represented businesses must devote time and sensitive expertise to the review.

Key Provisions

  • Requires an interagency and private-sector unlawful-robocall task force within 270 days.
  • Requires a congressional report on foreign robocall origins, losses, authentication, enforcement, traceback, and best practices.
  • Provides traceback-consortium immunity for receiving, sharing, and publishing covered information.
  • Authorizes publication of nonparticipating or high-volume unlawful-call providers and related FCC enforcement.
  • Requires risk-based bonds of up to $100,000 for certain Robocall Mitigation Database applicants.
  • Protects bona fide providers through exemption criteria and categorical relief.
  • Limits the task force to 90 days after its report and reduces consortium notice frequency to once every three years.

Evidence Chain:

This summary is generated from the full bill text using AI analysis. Expand "Detailed Analysis" below for identified beneficiaries/burden bearers with clause-level evidence links.

At a Glance

What This Bill Does

Creates a temporary interagency and private-sector task force on foreign-origin unlawful robocalls, strengthens traceback protections and provider accountability, and authorizes risk-based bonds for Robocall Mitigation Database applicants.

Key Policy Areas

Telecommunications, Consumer Protection, Robocall Enforcement

Primary Purpose

Creates a temporary interagency and private-sector task force on foreign-origin unlawful robocalls, strengthens traceback protections and provider accountability, and authorizes risk-based bonds for Robocall Mitigation Database applicants.

Policy Domains

Telecommunications Consumer Protection Robocall Enforcement

Foreign Robocall Elimination Act

Identified Gains
  • Consumers receiving unlawful robocalls
  • Registered traceback consortium
  • Compliant established voice providers
  • Customer-advocacy organizations
  • Federal robocall enforcement agencies
Model: codex-gpt-5 | Version: bill_summary_v2 | Source: es
Customer-advocacy organizations: , ,
Registered traceback consortium: , ,
Compliant established voice providers: , ,
Federal robocall enforcement agencies: , ,
Consumers receiving unlawful robocalls: , ,
Identified Costs
  • Federal Communications Commission staff
  • Federal Trade Commission and Justice Department staff
  • High-risk voice service providers
  • Task-force members
  • Providers identified in traceback publications
Model: codex-gpt-5 | Version: bill_summary_v2 | Source: es
Task-force members: , ,
High-risk voice service providers: , ,
Federal Communications Commission staff: , ,
Providers identified in traceback publications: , ,
Federal Trade Commission and Justice Department staff: , ,

Legislative Progress

Passed Senate
Introduced Committee Passed
Aug 10, 2026

Held at the desk.

Aug 10, 2026

Received in the House.

Aug 10, 2026

Message on Senate action sent to the House.

Aug 3, 2026

Passed Senate with an amendment by Unanimous Consent. (consideration: CR …

Aug 3, 2026

Passed/agreed to in Senate: Passed Senate with an amendment by …

Jun 1, 2026

Placed on Senate Legislative Calendar under General Orders. Calendar No. …

Jun 1, 2026

Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation. Reported by Senator Cruz …

Jun 1, 2026

Reported by Mr. Cruz, with an amendment

Oct 21, 2025

Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation. Ordered to be reported …

Aug 1, 2025

Mr. Budd (for himself and Mr. Welch) introduced the following …

Stakeholder Effects

cui bono?

How this legislation distributes effects. Mention counts reflect frequency, not effect magnitude.

Government
13 mentions across 9 clauses
+1 positive -8 negative ?4 uncertain

Department of Justice, Federal Communications Commission, Federal Trade Commission

Federal Communications Commission faces effects in multiple directions

Telecommunications
9 mentions across 4 clauses
+4 positive -5 negative

Compliant established voice providers, High-risk voice service providers, Legitimate providers named in error

Voice service providers faces effects in multiple directions

Positive-direction: Compliant established voice providers, Robocall analytics and technology providers

Negative-direction: High-risk voice service providers, Legitimate providers named in error, Voice providers carrying substantial unlawful robocalls, Voice providers refusing traceback participation

General Public
7 mentions across 6 clauses
+4 positive -1 negative ?2 uncertain

Consumers monitoring traceback governance, Consumers receiving unlawful robocalls, Unlawful-robocall task-force members

Positive-direction: Consumers receiving unlawful robocalls

Negative-direction: Consumers monitoring traceback governance

Nonprofits
4 mentions across 4 clauses
+3 positive ?1 uncertain

Customer-advocacy organizations, Registered traceback consortium

Professional Services
2 mentions across 2 clauses
?2 uncertain

Legislative compliance counsel

Finance
1 mention across 1 clause
+1 positive

Bond providers

5/8
sections analyzed
Full impact breakdown

Bill Structure & Actor Mappings

Who is "The Secretary" in each section?

Domains
Telecommunications Consumer Protection Robocall Enforcement
Actor Mappings
"advisory_body"
→ Interagency task force on unlawful robocalls
"lead_regulator"
→ Federal Communications Commission
"traceback_body"
→ Registered consortium under the TRACED Act
"affected_public"
→ Consumers and businesses receiving unlawful robocalls
"federal_partners"
→ Federal Trade Commission, Department of Justice, and other relevant agencies
"regulated_entities"
→ Voice providers seeking Robocall Mitigation Database certification

We use a combination of our own taxonomy and classification in addition to large language models to assess meaning and potential beneficiaries. High confidence means strong textual evidence. Always verify with the original bill text.

Learn more about our methodology