Foreign Robocall Elimination Act
Summary
What This Bill Does
The Foreign Robocall Elimination Act requires the FCC, after consulting the FTC and Attorney General, to establish an unlawful-robocall task force within 270 days. The body combines relevant federal agencies with seven private-sector representatives from voice providers, analytics and technology, the registered traceback consortium, marketing and nonmarketing callers, and a customer advocate. It must study the scale and foreign origins of unlawful calls, financial and identity losses, international authentication, STIR/SHAKEN, traceback, foreign cooperation, Justice enforcement resources and penalties, voluntary blocking practices, public disclosure tradeoffs, and TRACED Act compliance. Its report is due to Congress within 360 days after formation, and the task force terminates 90 days later. The Act changes FCC notice about the registered consortium from annual to once every three years. It immunizes the consortium from lawsuits for receiving, sharing, or publishing covered traceback information; permits the FCC or consortium to publish providers that refuse traceback participation or carry substantial unlawful traffic; and permits FCC enforcement based on that information. FCC must create a rule requiring a bond of up to $100,000 before a provider certifies in the Robocall Mitigation Database when needed to protect database integrity. Rules must exempt bona fide established providers when a bond is unnecessary, require bonds from providers lacking legitimate operations, sufficient oversight, or ability to pay penalties, and minimize burdens on compliant regulated providers.
Who Benefits and How
Consumers and businesses receiving calls may benefit from better identification, blocking, traceback, foreign cooperation, and enforcement against unlawful robocalls. Customer advocates gain a seat in the task force, while Congress and enforcement agencies gain a detailed assessment and recommendations. The registered traceback consortium gains liability protection for covered information sharing and authority, with FCC consultation, to identify nonparticipating or high-risk voice providers. Established, regulated voice providers benefit from required categorical bond exemptions and a direction to minimize unnecessary financial and administrative burdens.
Who Bears the Burden and How
FCC, FTC, Justice, and participating agencies must appoint members, support the task force, analyze extensive technical and enforcement questions, and produce the report. FCC must conduct rulemaking, evaluate bond necessity and exemptions, maintain provider accountability, and consider enforcement based on published information. Voice providers that cannot demonstrate legitimate ongoing operations, regulatory oversight, or ability to pay penalties may have to post up to $100,000 before database certification and may be publicly listed or investigated. Task-force members and represented businesses must devote time and sensitive expertise to the review.
Key Provisions
- Requires an interagency and private-sector unlawful-robocall task force within 270 days.
- Requires a congressional report on foreign robocall origins, losses, authentication, enforcement, traceback, and best practices.
- Provides traceback-consortium immunity for receiving, sharing, and publishing covered information.
- Authorizes publication of nonparticipating or high-volume unlawful-call providers and related FCC enforcement.
- Requires risk-based bonds of up to $100,000 for certain Robocall Mitigation Database applicants.
- Protects bona fide providers through exemption criteria and categorical relief.
- Limits the task force to 90 days after its report and reduces consortium notice frequency to once every three years.
Evidence Chain:
This summary is generated from the full bill text using AI analysis. Expand "Detailed Analysis" below for identified beneficiaries/burden bearers with clause-level evidence links.
At a Glance
What This Bill Does
Creates a temporary interagency and private-sector task force on foreign-origin unlawful robocalls, strengthens traceback protections and provider accountability, and authorizes risk-based bonds for Robocall Mitigation Database applicants.
Key Policy Areas
Telecommunications, Consumer Protection, Robocall Enforcement
Primary Purpose
Creates a temporary interagency and private-sector task force on foreign-origin unlawful robocalls, strengthens traceback protections and provider accountability, and authorizes risk-based bonds for Robocall Mitigation Database applicants.
Policy Domains
Foreign Robocall Elimination Act
Identified Gains
- Consumers receiving unlawful robocalls
- Registered traceback consortium
- Compliant established voice providers
- Customer-advocacy organizations
- Federal robocall enforcement agencies
Identified Costs
- Federal Communications Commission staff
- Federal Trade Commission and Justice Department staff
- High-risk voice service providers
- Task-force members
- Providers identified in traceback publications
Sponsors
Legislative Progress
Passed SenateHeld at the desk.
Received in the House.
Message on Senate action sent to the House.
Passed Senate with an amendment by Unanimous Consent. (consideration: CR …
Passed/agreed to in Senate: Passed Senate with an amendment by …
Placed on Senate Legislative Calendar under General Orders. Calendar No. …
Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation. Reported by Senator Cruz …
Reported by Mr. Cruz, with an amendment
Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation. Ordered to be reported …
Mr. Budd (for himself and Mr. Welch) introduced the following …
Stakeholder Effects
cui bono?How this legislation distributes effects. Mention counts reflect frequency, not effect magnitude.
Department of Justice, Federal Communications Commission, Federal Trade Commission
Federal Communications Commission faces effects in multiple directions
Compliant established voice providers, High-risk voice service providers, Legitimate providers named in error
Voice service providers faces effects in multiple directions
Positive-direction: Compliant established voice providers, Robocall analytics and technology providers
Negative-direction: High-risk voice service providers, Legitimate providers named in error, Voice providers carrying substantial unlawful robocalls, Voice providers refusing traceback participation
Consumers monitoring traceback governance, Consumers receiving unlawful robocalls, Unlawful-robocall task-force members
Positive-direction: Consumers receiving unlawful robocalls
Negative-direction: Consumers monitoring traceback governance
Customer-advocacy organizations, Registered traceback consortium
Bill Structure & Actor Mappings
Who is "The Secretary" in each section?
- "advisory_body"
- → Interagency task force on unlawful robocalls
- "lead_regulator"
- → Federal Communications Commission
- "traceback_body"
- → Registered consortium under the TRACED Act
- "affected_public"
- → Consumers and businesses receiving unlawful robocalls
- "federal_partners"
- → Federal Trade Commission, Department of Justice, and other relevant agencies
- "regulated_entities"
- → Voice providers seeking Robocall Mitigation Database certification
We use a combination of our own taxonomy and classification in addition to large language models to assess meaning and potential beneficiaries. High confidence means strong textual evidence. Always verify with the original bill text.
Learn more about our methodology