S2256-119

Reported

Agriculture, Rural Development, Food and Drug Administration, and Related Agencies Appropriations Act, 2026

119th Congress Introduced Jul 10, 2025

Summary

What This Bill Does

Provides fiscal year 2026 Agriculture, Rural Development, FDA, and related-agency appropriations and a long set of policy riders controlling USDA transfers, National Finance Center operations, nonprofit indirect costs, rural loans, SNAP retailer standards, food and drug rules, rural water Buy America requirements, persistent-poverty allocations, housing preservation grants, child nutrition procurement, conservation technical services, fish advice, bison marketing grants, pet shelter grants, tobacco enforcement, hemp definitions, rural energy circuit riders, rescissions, and office-closure restrictions.

Who Benefits and How

USDA agencies benefit from continued appropriations and targeted flexibilities for loan programs, working capital services, rural development, conservation technical services, National Finance Center shared services, and emergency operations. Rural communities benefit from persistent-poverty set-asides, rural housing preservation technical assistance, rural water and wastewater program funding, Energy Circuit Riders, community facilities, broadband, telemedicine, and rural business programs. SNAP retailers benefit because USDA cannot enforce the 2016 variety requirements until the variety definition is broadened. Meat, poultry, and egg establishments benefit from continued FSIS holiday or overtime inspection availability, though they pay the inspection costs. Domestic iron and steel producers benefit from a Buy America requirement in rural water and wastewater projects. School meal programs benefit from a bar on PRC poultry and seafood procurement and a temporary rule on paid-lunch pricing. Bison producers, Tribal bison organizations, pet shelter grantees, and affordable housing nonprofits benefit from specific $2 million or $3 million grant provisions. FDA tobacco enforcement benefits from at least $200 million in tobacco user fees for ENDS enforcement and a multi-agency task force.

Who Bears the Burden and How

USDA, FDA, Farm Credit Administration, Rural Development, NRCS, NIFA, FSIS, APHIS, and FDA tobacco staff must comply with dozens of spending restrictions, notifications, reports, waivers, and program rules. Federal taxpayers bear the cost of the appropriations while prior-year balances are rescinded from NRCS conservation operations, NIFA research and education, Food for Peace Title II grants, broadband pilot balances, and the Working Capital Fund. Nonprofit institutions working under USDA cooperative agreements face a 10 percent indirect-cost cap. FDA is barred from moving to electronic prescribing information without new federal law, from enforcing specified produce-safety rules against certain entities, and from issuing new sodium or ultra-processed food guidance. Hemp-derived cannabinoid product makers face a narrowed hemp definition that excludes synthetic or intoxicating cannabinoid products from hemp. USDA office and lab reorganization plans face restrictions, and grant terminations require advance written notice to appropriations committees.

Key Provisions

  • Authorizes USDA Working Capital Fund transfers while requiring agency-administrator approval and appropriations-committee notice for National Finance Center changes.
  • Limits USDA nonprofit cooperative-agreement indirect costs to 10 percent of total direct costs.
  • Bars FDA electronic prescribing-information rules unless Congress enacts authorizing law.
  • Blocks enforcement of SNAP retailer variety requirements until USDA broadens acceptable variety definitions.
  • Authorizes FSIS to charge meat, poultry, and egg establishments for overtime and holiday inspections.
  • Requires U.S.-produced iron and steel for rural water and wastewater projects, with public-interest, availability, quality, and cost waivers.
  • Requires at least 10 percent of specified rural loans and grants to assist persistent poverty counties.
  • Appropriates $2 million for rural multifamily housing preservation technical assistance, $2 million for bison production and marketing, $3 million for pet shelter grants, and $4 million for Energy Circuit Riders.
  • Bars school meal procurement of PRC poultry and seafood and directs FDA fish-consumption advice by September 30, 2026.
  • Rescinds unobligated balances including $30 million from NRCS conservation operations, $22 million from NIFA research and education, $200 million from Food for Peace Title II grants, and $78 million from the Working Capital Fund.
  • Requires at least $200 million in FDA tobacco user fees for e-cigarette and vape enforcement and narrows the hemp definition to exclude certain hemp-derived cannabinoid products.

Evidence Chain:

This summary is generated from the full bill text using AI analysis. Expand "Detailed Analysis" below for identified beneficiaries/burden bearers with clause-level evidence links.

At a Glance

What This Bill Does

Provides fiscal year 2026 Agriculture, Rural Development, FDA, and related-agency appropriations and a long set of policy riders controlling USDA transfers, National Finance Center operations, nonprofit indirect costs, rural loans, SNAP retailer standards, food and drug rules, rural water Buy America requirements, persistent-poverty allocations, housing preservation grants, child nutrition procurement, conservation technical services, fish advice, bison marketing grants, pet shelter grants, tobacco enforcement, hemp definitions, rural energy circuit riders, rescissions, and office-closure restrictions.

Key Policy Areas

Appropriations, Agriculture, Rural Development, Food and Drug Administration, Nutrition, Conservation

Primary Purpose

Provides fiscal year 2026 Agriculture, Rural Development, FDA, and related-agency appropriations and a long set of policy riders controlling USDA transfers, National Finance Center operations, nonprofit indirect costs, rural loans, SNAP retailer standards, food and drug rules, rural water Buy America requirements, persistent-poverty allocations, housing preservation grants, child nutrition procurement, conservation technical services, fish advice, bison marketing grants, pet shelter grants, tobacco enforcement, hemp definitions, rural energy circuit riders, rescissions, and office-closure restrictions.

Policy Domains

Appropriations Agriculture Rural Development Food and Drug Administration Nutrition Conservation

House resolution provisions

Identified Gains
  • USDA agencies
  • Rural communities
  • SNAP retailers
  • FSIS inspected establishments
  • Domestic iron manufacturers
  • Persistent poverty counties
  • Bison producers
  • Tribal bison organizations
  • Pet shelter grantees
  • FDA tobacco enforcement staff
  • Industrial hemp growers
Model: codex-gpt-5 | Version: bill_summary_v2 | Source: rs
USDA agencies: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
SNAP retailers: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
Bison producers: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
Rural communities: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
Pet shelter grantees: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
Industrial hemp growers: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
Tribal bison organizations: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
Domestic iron manufacturers: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
Persistent poverty counties: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
FDA tobacco enforcement staff: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
FSIS inspected establishments: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
Identified Costs
  • USDA
  • FDA
  • Farm Credit Administration
  • Rural Development
  • NRCS
  • NIFA
  • Nonprofit institutions
  • Federal taxpayers
  • Food for Peace recipients
  • Hemp-derived cannabinoid manufacturers
  • FDA food-policy staff
Model: codex-gpt-5 | Version: bill_summary_v2 | Source: rs
FDA: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
NIFA: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
NRCS: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
USDA: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
Federal taxpayers: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
Rural Development: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
FDA food-policy staff: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
Nonprofit institutions: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
Food for Peace recipients: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
Farm Credit Administration: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
Hemp-derived cannabinoid manufacturers: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Legislative Progress

Reported
Introduced Committee Passed
Jul 10, 2025

Mr. Hoeven, from the Committee on Appropriations, reported the following …

Jul 10, 2025

Placed on Senate Legislative Calendar under General Orders. Calendar No. …

Jul 10, 2025

Committee on Appropriations. Original measure reported to Senate by Senator …

Jul 10, 2025

Introduced in Senate

May 22, 2025

Subcommittee on Agriculture, Rural Development, Food and Drug Administration, and …

May 6, 2025

Subcommittee on Agriculture, Rural Development, Food and Drug Administration, and …

Stakeholder Effects

cui bono?

How this legislation distributes effects. Mention counts reflect frequency, not effect magnitude.

Government
62 mentions across 48 clauses
+31 positive -31 negative

Agency employees, Congressional appropriations committees, Grant administrators

Congressional appropriations committees, Taxpayers, USDA Working Capital Fund face effects in multiple directions

Positive-direction: USDA National Finance Center

Negative-direction: Agency employees, Grant administrators, USDA Chief Financial Officer

Agriculture
62 mentions across 39 clauses
+13 positive -49 negative

Agricultural Marketing Service, Bison producers, Domestic poultry producers

Agricultural Marketing Service, USDA program offices face effects in multiple directions

Positive-direction: Bison producers, Domestic poultry producers, Farmers, Industrial hemp growers, Livestock market participants, U.S. livestock producers, USDA agencies

Negative-direction: Farm Credit Administration, USDA administrative offices, USDA agreement officers, USDA grant staff, USDA hemp program staff, USDA marketing staff

Food & Beverage
58 mentions across 32 clauses
+20 positive -38 negative

FDA, FDA administrative offices, FDA drug labeling staff

FSIS inspection program faces effects in multiple directions

Positive-direction: FDA, FDA drug regulators, FDA tobacco enforcement staff, Food safety regulators, Meat processors, Regulated food manufacturers, Seafood consumers

Negative-direction: FDA administrative offices, FDA drug labeling staff, FDA drug-review staff, FDA food-policy staff, FSIS inspected establishments, FSIS inspectors, Food for Peace recipients, Foreign meat exporters, Horse meat processors

Rural Communities
36 mentions across 17 clauses
+24 positive -12 negative

Persistent poverty counties, Rural Development staff, Rural Utilities Service

Positive-direction: Persistent poverty counties, Rural communities, Rural loan borrowers, Rural partnership grantees

Negative-direction: Rural Development staff, Rural Utilities Service

Real Estate
12 mentions across 11 clauses
+11 positive -1 negative

Domestic violence survivors, RHS multifamily housing borrowers, Rural Housing Service staff

Positive-direction: Domestic violence survivors, RHS multifamily housing borrowers, Rural housing applicants

Negative-direction: Rural Housing Service staff

Environment
10 mentions across 5 clauses
+4 positive -6 negative

Conservation program applicants, NRCS conservation programs, NRCS conservation staff

Positive-direction: NRCS conservation programs

Negative-direction: Conservation program applicants, NRCS conservation staff

Tribal Nations
5 mentions across 5 clauses
+5 positive

Tribal bison organizations, Tribal food programs

Nutrition
5 mentions across 4 clauses
-5 negative

Nutrition access advocates, USDA Food and Nutrition Service, USDA child nutrition staff

77/83
sections analyzed
Full impact breakdown

Bill Structure & Actor Mappings

Who is "The Secretary" in each section?

Domains
Appropriations Agriculture Rural Development Food and Drug Administration Nutrition Conservation
Actor Mappings
"commissioner"
→ Commissioner of Food and Drugs
"secretary_agriculture"
→ Secretary of Agriculture

We use a combination of our own taxonomy and classification in addition to large language models to assess meaning and potential beneficiaries. High confidence means strong textual evidence. Always verify with the original bill text.

Learn more about our methodology