S2214-119

Introduced

To promote innovation and advanced manufacturing in the Department of Defense and the defense industrial base, and for other purposes.

119th Congress Introduced Jul 8, 2025

Analysis under review: This bill has generated analysis that may be too generic or incomplete. Clause-level evidence remains available below.

Summary

What This Bill Does

The bill imposes prohibition on DoD operation, procurement, and contracting of additive manufacturing machines from China, Iran, North Korea, and Russia, establishes dual-use advanced manufacturing hubs co-locating public and private stakeholders with shared infrastructure, and requires doD advanced manufacturing program to qualify and approve 1,000,000 parts using advanced manufacturing by December 2027. It relies on compliance mandates, procurement rules, reporting requirements, and trade restrictions. The main policy areas are Defense and Labor.

Who Benefits and How

Manufacturing Innovation Institutes (MIIs) could gain revenue opportunities, Metal additive manufacturing companies could gain revenue opportunities, and Domestic additive manufacturing companies could gain revenue opportunities.

Who Bears the Burden and How

Foreign additive manufacturing companies from covered countries (China, Iran, DPRK, Russia) could lose revenue opportunities, Foreign advanced manufacturing equipment suppliers could face higher barriers, and Department of Defense would take on compliance duties.

Key Provisions

  • Imposes prohibition on DoD operation, procurement, and contracting of additive manufacturing machines from China, Iran, North Korea, and Russia.
  • Establishes dual-use advanced manufacturing hubs co-locating public and private stakeholders with shared infrastructure.
  • Requires doD advanced manufacturing program to qualify and approve 1,000,000 parts using advanced manufacturing by December 2027.
  • Requires program to produce replacement parts for military systems with diminishing manufacturing sources using additive manufacturing, including new IP licensing agreements.
  • Requires program to additively manufacture commonly used metal parts (titanium, stainless steel, aluminum) across all military departments with assessment of long-lead-time and sole-source parts.

Evidence Chain:

This summary is generated from the full bill text using AI analysis. Expand "Detailed Analysis" below for identified beneficiaries/burden bearers with clause-level evidence links.

At a Glance

What This Bill Does

The bill imposes prohibition on DoD operation, procurement, and contracting of additive manufacturing machines from China, Iran, North Korea, and Russia, establishes dual-use advanced manufacturing hubs co-locating public and private stakeholders with shared infrastructure, and requires doD advanced manufacturing program to qualify and approve 1,000,000 parts using advanced manufacturing by December 2027.

Key Policy Areas

Defense, Labor

Primary Purpose

The bill imposes prohibition on DoD operation, procurement, and contracting of additive manufacturing machines from China, Iran, North Korea, and Russia, establishes dual-use advanced manufacturing hubs co-locating public and private stakeholders with shared infrastructure, and requires doD advanced manufacturing program to qualify and approve 1,000,000 parts using advanced manufacturing by December 2027.

Policy Domains

Defense Labor

Whole bill

Identified Gains
  • Manufacturing Innovation Institutes (MIIs)
  • Metal additive manufacturing companies
  • Domestic additive manufacturing companies
  • Advanced manufacturing parts suppliers
  • Additive manufacturing firms serving Army ground systems
Model: codex-gpt-5:bulk-repair | Version: bill_summary_v2 | Source: is
Advanced manufacturing parts suppliers:
Metal additive manufacturing companies:
Domestic additive manufacturing companies:
Manufacturing Innovation Institutes (MIIs): ,
Additive manufacturing firms serving Army ground systems:
Identified Costs
  • Foreign additive manufacturing companies from covered countries (China, Iran, DPRK, Russia)
  • Foreign advanced manufacturing equipment suppliers
  • Department of Defense
  • Intellectual property holders of legacy military platform designs
  • Traditional defense parts manufacturers
Model: codex-gpt-5:bulk-repair | Version: bill_summary_v2 | Source: is
Department of Defense:
Traditional defense parts manufacturers:
Foreign advanced manufacturing equipment suppliers:
Intellectual property holders of legacy military platform designs:
Foreign additive manufacturing companies from covered countries (China, Iran, DPRK, Russia):

Legislative Progress

Introduced
Introduced Committee Passed
Jul 8, 2025

Ms. Slotkin introduced the following bill; which was read twice …

Stakeholder Effects

cui bono?

How this legislation distributes effects. Mention counts reflect frequency, not effect magnitude.

Defense
17 mentions across 8 clauses
+12 positive -5 negative

Additive manufacturing firms capable of producing military replacement parts, Additive manufacturing firms serving Army ground systems, Advanced manufacturing companies in defense technology

Positive-direction: Additive manufacturing firms capable of producing military replacement parts, Additive manufacturing firms serving Army ground systems, Advanced manufacturing companies in defense technology, Advanced manufacturing parts suppliers, Allied defense manufacturing firms, Domestic additive manufacturing companies, Domestic advanced manufacturing companies, Manufacturing Innovation Institutes (MIIs), Metal additive manufacturing companies, Small businesses with advanced manufacturing technology (SBIR/STTR), U.S. advanced manufacturing companies with international operations

Negative-direction: Foreign additive manufacturing companies from covered countries (China, Iran, DPRK, Russia), Foreign advanced manufacturing equipment suppliers, Intellectual property holders of legacy military platform designs, Sole-source metal parts suppliers to DoD, Traditional defense parts manufacturers

Government
4 mentions across 4 clauses
+2 positive -2 negative

Army Organic Industrial Base (arsenals and depots), Defense Logistics Agency, Department of Defense

Positive-direction: Army Organic Industrial Base (arsenals and depots), Military departments with supply chain shortages

Negative-direction: Defense Logistics Agency, Department of Defense

Labor
1 mention across 1 clause
+1 positive

Military service members transitioning to civilian workforce

8/12
sections analyzed
Full impact breakdown

Bill Structure & Actor Mappings

Who is "The Secretary" in each section?

Domains
Defense Labor

We use a combination of our own taxonomy and classification in addition to large language models to assess meaning and potential beneficiaries. High confidence means strong textual evidence. Always verify with the original bill text.

Learn more about our methodology