Holocaust Expropriated Art Recovery Act of 2025
Sponsors
Legislative Progress
IntroducedMr. Cornyn (for himself, Mr. Blumenthal, Mr. Tillis, Mr. Booker, …
Mr. Cornyn (for himself, Mr. Blumenthal, Mr. Tillis, Mr. Booker, …
Passed Senate (inferred from es version)
Summary
What This Bill Does
This bill strengthens the Holocaust Expropriated Art Recovery Act of 2016 to help victims of Nazi persecution and their heirs recover stolen artwork. It addresses a problem where courts have been dismissing legitimate claims to recover Nazi-looted art based on procedural technicalities rather than deciding cases on their actual merits.
Who Benefits and How
Victims of Nazi persecution and their heirs benefit directly from this legislation. They gain the ability to pursue claims for stolen artwork without facing dismissal based on time-elapsed defenses (like "you waited too long to sue") or procedural escape routes that defendants have used to avoid accountability. The bill also allows claims regardless of the victim's nationality, helping Jewish families from any country seek recovery of looted property.
Who Bears the Burden and How
Museums, art collectors, galleries, and foundations currently holding Nazi-looted artwork face increased legal exposure. They can no longer rely on defenses based on the passage of time (such as laches, adverse possession, or "I've had it so long it's mine now") or procedural doctrines (like forum non-conveniens or international comity) to avoid having their cases decided on the merits. The bill also enables nationwide service of process, making it harder for defendants to avoid being sued.
Key Provisions
- Explicitly bars all time-based defenses including laches, adverse possession, acquisitive prescription, and usucapion from being used to dismiss Holocaust art recovery claims
- Prohibits courts from dismissing cases based on non-merits grounds like the act of state doctrine, international comity, forum non-conveniens, or prudential exhaustion
- Allows claims regardless of the nationality or citizenship of the Nazi persecution victim
- Permits nationwide service of process, so defendants can be served anywhere in the United States
- Applies to all pending cases (including those on appeal) and future cases filed after enactment
Evidence Chain:
This summary is derived from the structured analysis below. See "Detailed Analysis" for per-title beneficiaries/burden bearers with clause-level evidence links.
Primary Purpose
The bill aims to clarify the Holocaust Expropriated Art Recovery Act of 2016 by limiting defenses based on time and non-merits grounds, ensuring claims for Nazi-looted art are resolved on their merits.
Policy Domains
Bill Structure & Actor Mappings
Who is "The Secretary" in each section?
Key Definitions
Terms defined in this bill
Amends the 2016 Act to clarify its intent, limit defenses based on time and non-merits grounds, ensure claims are resolved on their merits, allow recovery of Nazi-looted art regardless of victim nationality or citizenship, and provide for nationwide service of process.
The bill may be cited as the Holocaust Expropriated Art Recovery Act of 2025.
We use a combination of our own taxonomy and classification in addition to large language models to assess meaning and potential beneficiaries. High confidence means strong textual evidence. Always verify with the original bill text.
Learn more about our methodology