To amend the Food Security Act of 1985 to improve the conservation reserve program, and for other purposes.
Analysis under review: This bill has generated analysis that may be too generic or incomplete. Clause-level evidence remains available below.
Summary
What This Bill Does
The bill requires conservation reserve program improvements Section 1231(d)(6)(A)(i) of the Food Security Act of 1985 (16 U.S.C. It relies on definition changes, compliance mandates, and procurement rules. The main policy areas are Agriculture, Energy, and Environment.
Who Benefits and How
Water infrastructure operators and water users affected by the bill could gain revenue opportunities, Natural gas companies and customers affected by the bill could gain revenue opportunities, and Agricultural producers and rural communities affected by the bill could gain revenue opportunities.
Who Bears the Burden and How
Federal, state, or local agencies responsible for implementing the clause would take on compliance duties.
Key Provisions
- Requires conservation reserve program improvements Section 1231(d)(6)(A)(i) of the Food Security Act of 1985 (16 U.S.C.
Evidence Chain:
This summary is generated from the full bill text using AI analysis. Expand "Detailed Analysis" below for identified beneficiaries/burden bearers with clause-level evidence links.
At a Glance
What This Bill Does
The bill requires conservation reserve program improvements Section 1231(d)(6)(A)(i) of the Food Security Act of 1985 (16 U.S.C.
Key Policy Areas
Agriculture, Energy, Environment
Primary Purpose
The bill requires conservation reserve program improvements Section 1231(d)(6)(A)(i) of the Food Security Act of 1985 (16 U.S.C.
Policy Domains
Whole bill
Identified Gains
- Water infrastructure operators and water users affected by the bill
- Natural gas companies and customers affected by the bill
- Agricultural producers and rural communities affected by the bill
Identified Costs
- Federal, state, or local agencies responsible for implementing the clause
Sponsors
John Thune
R-SD | Primary Sponsor
Legislative Progress
IntroducedMr. Thune (for himself and Ms. Klobuchar) introduced the following …
Impact analysis is available but no clear stakeholder effects identified. View clause-level analysis →
Bill Structure & Actor Mappings
Who is "The Secretary" in each section?
We use a combination of our own taxonomy and classification in addition to large language models to assess meaning and potential beneficiaries. High confidence means strong textual evidence. Always verify with the original bill text.
Learn more about our methodology